It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That’s just another nonsensical biblical prophecy. How about we teach our children to be scientifically literate instead of superstitious.
originally posted by: mamabeth
originally posted by: wylekat
originally posted by: NarcolepticBuddha
originally posted by: Woodcarver
Perhaps you don’t understand the need to separate church from state? Or the reasons why we do not pander to those who believe in Gods?
originally posted by: NarcolepticBuddha
originally posted by: Woodcarver
a reply to: ScatteredThirdAngel
Yea, ok. Just as soon as they prove their version of some god actually exists.
Otherwise fire them all and prohibit them from filling any gov or state position for the rest of their lives.
Just pretend 'they' worship money. It's still printed on money, isn't it? Coincidence?
Anyways, they're just words. Let people cheerlead their words if they want, it never hurt you or me none.
As I said, it's just words. No one forcing anyone to attend church or announce their beliefs.
YET.
This will only happen when the one world religion is FORCED on the world.
Do you see what you did there? You stopped quoting me right in the middle of a sentence. The sentence reads
originally posted by: Irishhaf
originally posted by: Woodcarver
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Woodcarver
So you are telling people in another state that they don't have the freedom to choose their own state motto.
No, I’m saying the first amendment literally prohibits that phrase from being affiliated with any state sponsorship. The only reason it got approved to be on our current sea, is that our currency is not made by our government, which is another thing that goes against the Constitution.
The First... prohibits a phrase...might want to rethink that statement.
the first amendment literally prohibits that phrase from being affiliated with any state sponsorship.
originally posted by: Woodcarver
Do you see what you did there? You stoped quoting me right in the middle of a sentence. The sentence reads [qoute]the first amendment literally prohibits that phrase from being affiliated with any state sponsorship.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
originally posted by: Woodcarver
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Woodcarver
So you are telling people in another state that they don't have the freedom to choose their own state motto.
No, I’m saying the first amendment literally prohibits that phrase from being affiliated with any state sponsorship. The only reason it got approved to be on our current sea, is that our currency is not made by our government, which is another thing that goes against the Constitution.
The First... prohibits a phrase...might want to rethink that statement.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: Woodcarver
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Nope still dont see it, what law was created endorsing a religion?
Was it stupid to do this, yea because Florida has a bucket load of problems that need to be addressed so wasting time on something that is going to be challenged in courts immediately was a stupid publicity stunt.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: intrepid
Kinda torn on this. First off, who cares? Kids will figure out the god thing on their own eventually. But secondly the state advertising god is not kosher. So......
Jesus was Jewish so actually it is kosher.
Just sayin'
Did the state mandate that the phrase be written on the walls of the schools or not?
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: Woodcarver
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Nope still dont see it, what law was created endorsing a religion?
Was it stupid to do this, yea because Florida has a bucket load of problems that need to be addressed so wasting time on something that is going to be challenged in courts immediately was a stupid publicity stunt.
does anybody really think that this phrase is in reference to any other Deity than the alleged Christian God?
Would you be just as supportive of a school in Washington DC that chooses to write allahu akbar on the walls?
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: intrepid
Kinda torn on this. First off, who cares? Kids will figure out the god thing on their own eventually. But secondly the state advertising god is not kosher. So......
Jesus was Jewish so actually it is kosher.
Just sayin'
You're saying Jesus is god? Loads of people would disagree with that. Including a helluva lot of Christians.
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: Woodcarver
I don't intend to be snarky (though it will read that way). If you don't want a public school influencing your children, then don't send them to a Public School. They will be influenced in all manners of ways, on all manner of subjects. But that's not really the point is it ? The point is you want a state mandated hostility towards religion, and citing the Constitution as basis for that ; But you're wrong about it's concept off the start.
does anybody really think that this phrase is in reference to any other Deity than the alleged Christian God?
Even people who don't believe in God, are well aware there are more than just the Christian religion and that the word it'self is a generic placeholder. If it said in Allah we Trust, that would be a violation. JUST as stating in Yaweh we Trust, or Vishnu we trust, etc. would be violations of endorsing or supporting one over the other.
Would you be just as supportive of a school in Washington DC that chooses to write allahu akbar on the walls?
Technically if it was English, stating God is Great (again as a generic placeholder) that would not be a violation. Although the name Allah is most certainly specific. Atleast, as I understand the name Allah.
originally posted by: mamabeth
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: intrepid
Kinda torn on this. First off, who cares? Kids will figure out the god thing on their own eventually. But secondly the state advertising god is not kosher. So......
Jesus was Jewish so actually it is kosher.
Just sayin'
You're saying Jesus is god? Loads of people would disagree with that. Including a helluva lot of Christians.
Wrong,Yeshua/Jesus was God in flesh!