Flynn charged with one count of making false statement

a reply to: carewemust

The Manafort indictment went away?

a reply to: face23785

Tillerson will be gone by new years eve.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

ETA: And it's one of several very questionable and possibly critical errors I've noticed about Mueller's collection of evidence

PS I'm thinking Mueller is a little better versed in the rule of law than you and so far what I'm seeing from you confirms it.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: face23785

Tillerson will be gone by new years eve.

Yeah just like the last 2 or 3 times he was on his way out? Do you guys ever get tired of being wrong?

a reply to: xuenchen

Yeah. He lost his job...well not so much lost it. The job was still there. Just somebody else was doing it.

a reply to: carewemust

Why don't you tell me.

You act like I'm the source for all this news. I'm flattered surely... But I'm not.
I'm sure Mueller knows what the laws are. I'm a merchant not a lawyer and I'm not even a merchant anymore because I'm retired.

a reply to: justwokeup

Survived it? A history lesson is needed here but this isn't the thread for that. I really do not think you understand what the cold war was. You should do at least a little research to get some details not offered in casual references to the time frame.
It touched almost every aspect of life in the early sixties especially. And remember we were coming from a simpler time and these very real threats were terrifying. We had bomb raid drills ..in elementary school...in New York city not London during the blitz. It was very real.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
I'm thinking...

Well, there's your problem, right there.

a reply to: Xcathdra

What facts do you think I'm ignoring?.
I think I'm just ignoring a bad interpretation of the facts. Not the facts themselves.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Guess I have a problem then...

Not as big as the one trump does but.......

a reply to: carewemust

Oh my. Do you think playing stupid is going to make firing Comey to halt the investigation into Flynn go away ( especially in light of current events) ?

It's why the whole special counsel was convened to begin with.


Maybe your memory is a bit faulty.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust

firing Comey to halt the investigation into Flynn go away

This right here is your problem. You make # up. No matter how many times you repeat this lie, it's still a lie. You live in a world of your own. You're pathetic. I seriously hope you don't commit any self-harm when this bubble bursts.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust

Oh my. Do you think playing stupid is going to make firing Comey to halt the investigation into Flynn go away ( especially in light of current events) ?

It's why the whole special counsel was convened to begin with.


Maybe your memory is a bit faulty.

Comey was not investigating anyone. He was the Director of the FBI. The Director doesn't conduct investigations. Firing the Director has zero impact on ongoing investigations. Comey himself testified so to Congress. You could argue Trump didn't know that, but that would require Trump to have zero idea how a large organization works. Trump ran a large organization most of his adult life.

This is akin to the CEO of a company firing his production manager, and some idiot coming along claiming the production manager was fired in order to halt production, while the production line continued unhindered the entire time, and completely ignoring the fact the production manager told us production was unaffected.

You are either dangerously delusional or one of the most dedicated scumbag liars on this forum trying to mislead people. I can't figure out which.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: MotherMayEye

What makes you think I'm white?

Are you or aren't you?

You, now:

originally posted by: Sillyolme
His son isn't part of this deal.

You, yesterday:

originally posted by: Sillyolme

Flynn took the deal to protect his son. Yes.

Make up your mind.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: justwokeup

Survived it? A history lesson is needed here but this isn't the thread for that. I really do not think you understand what the cold war was. You should do at least a little research to get some details not offered in casual references to the time frame.
It touched almost every aspect of life in the early sixties especially. And remember we were coming from a simpler time and these very real threats were terrifying. We had bomb raid drills ..in elementary school...in New York city not London during the blitz. It was very real.

I grew up in the 70s, 80s through the cold war where the spectre of nuclear war was prevalent. I remember my dad discussing the laughable civil defence advice the UK govt put out and the prospect of annihilation. We were very lucky to survive the period.

Only lunatics want that level of hair trigger nuclear tension back. It's ironic that most of the desperation to ensure relations with Russia remain bad or worsen is from the left when the push for dialog the first time around was supported by the left. I can only conclude these are idiots or simply to young to understand the potential consequences in thier 'get trump' fervor.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
You, now:

originally posted by: Sillyolme
His son isn't part of this deal.

You, yesterday:

originally posted by: Sillyolme

Flynn took the deal to protect his son. Yes.

Make up your mind.

They have twisted themselves into such a complicated knot trying to somehow make this untrue narrative true that when the realization finally hits, I'm afraid we'll see another Scalise-type event. Unhinged.

a reply to: kurthall

thats exactly what this about she said obama said dnc said she lost because RUSSIA. after trump got in office they started screaming collusion with russia trump blah blah blah. remember when after hillie lost obama blamed russians for supposidly hacking dnc and kicked out a bunch of people . there was no proof because dnc refused to let fbi cyberforensics team examine their computers.

originally posted by: proteus33
a reply to: kurthall

thats exactly what this about she said obama said dnc said she lost because RUSSIA. after trump got in office they started screaming collusion with russia trump blah blah blah. remember when after hillie lost obama blamed russians for supposidly hacking dnc and kicked out a bunch of people . there was no proof because dnc refused to let fbi cyberforensics team examine their computers.

I always found it interesting that Obama's response was such weak, token sanctions. Even some Democrats criticized the response as not being harsh enough punishment for what Russia supposedly did. I have wondered if that's because the administration knew they didn't have very solid evidence, so they didn't want to impose really tough sanctions based on what was really just a political narrative.