It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
Steele dossier sources:
How good were these sources? Consider what Steele would write in the memos he filed with Simpson: Source A—to use the careful nomenclature of his dossier—was “a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure.” Source B was “a former top level intelligence officer still active in the Kremlin.” And both of these insiders, after “speaking to a trusted compatriot,” would claim that the Kremlin had spent years getting its hooks into Donald Trump.
Source E was “an ethnic Russian” and “close associate of Republican US presidential candidate Donald Trump.”
...
Then there was Source D, “a close associate of Trump who had organized and managed his recent trips to Moscow,” and Source F, “a female staffer” at the Moscow Ritz-Carlton hotel, who was co-opted into the network by an Orbis “ethnic Russian operative” working hand in hand with the loquacious Trump insider, Source E.
From the alt-right Vanity Fair
Thank you!
It was going to be tuff linking and quoting from my phone.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Grambler
My god you actually are claiming this!
Hahahahahaha!!!!!
The only thing that makes me happy, is in knowing that you have all the answers. I'm genuinely glad about that.
Well I dont have all of the asnwers.
But I do have a base knowledge of the dossier in question, which I would recommend anyone try to get before declaring other people wrong.
But leaving all joking aside, I have made mistakes before, its no big deal. Hell introvert pointed out one I made on this thraed and I acknowledged he was right.
Now that you know it was Russian sources, do you think the dems paying for dirt that comes from russian sources to prove russian collusion is horribly troubling?
former colleagues rallied to defend him. One described him as “very credible” – a sober, cautious and meticulous professional with a formidable record.
The former Foreign Office official, who has known Steele for 25 years and considers him a friend, said: “The idea his work is fake or a cowboy operation is false – completely untrue. Chris is an experienced and highly regarded professional. He’s not the sort of person who will simply pass on gossip.”
originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: Grambler
This is like drunks bloviating at a bar.
REALITY
Fusion GPS "colluded with Russians" via Steele the same way the CIA colludes with Russia when it gathers intelligence from Russian Sources.
DELSUSION
an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of mental disorder.
Pure opinion here, but taking a good look at POTUS and his mental state?
Pretty sure he paid hookers to pee on a bed for him and took any help he could get from Putin.
Pretty sure you guys think the same.
I don't think that will be Muellers conclusion, but I do think we are going to see multiple indictments and enough evidence for people to get the picture.
You guys crack me up.
It came from a reputable and respected former MI-6 agent with a history of providing reliable intel.
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: dragonridr
Hillarys team lied about paying for it.
The people that paid for this dossier and then screamed Russia for nearly a year actually did give russia the means to interefer with our political system.
originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: Grambler
It came from a reputable and respected former MI-6 agent with a history of providing reliable intel.
Donald Trump dossier: intelligence sources vouch for author's credibility
www.theguardian.com...
former colleagues rallied to defend him. One described him as “very credible” – a sober, cautious and meticulous professional with a formidable record.
The former Foreign Office official, who has known Steele for 25 years and considers him a friend, said: “The idea his work is fake or a cowboy operation is false – completely untrue. Chris is an experienced and highly regarded professional. He’s not the sort of person who will simply pass on gossip.”
The official added: “If he puts something in a report, he believes there’s sufficient credibility in it for it to be worth considering. Chris is a very straight guy. He could not have survived in the job he was in if he had been prone to flights of fancy or doing things in an ill-considered way.”
That is the way the CIA and the FBI, not to mention the British government, regarded him, too. It’s not hard to see why.
A Cambridge graduate, Steele was one of the more eminent Russia specialists for the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6).
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: Grambler
This is like drunks bloviating at a bar.
REALITY
Fusion GPS "colluded with Russians" via Steele the same way the CIA colludes with Russia when it gathers intelligence from Russian Sources.
DELSUSION
an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of mental disorder.
Pure opinion here, but taking a good look at POTUS and his mental state?
Pretty sure he paid hookers to pee on a bed for him and took any help he could get from Putin.
Pretty sure you guys think the same.
I don't think that will be Muellers conclusion, but I do think we are going to see multiple indictments and enough evidence for people to get the picture.
You guys crack me up.
Yep we all believe Trump was getting peed on.
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: dragonridr
Hillarys team lied about paying for it.
you have a link?
The people that paid for this dossier and then screamed Russia for nearly a year actually did give russia the means to interefer with our political system.
Lord your arguments are muddled.
First - Russia interfered with our elections, THEN people screamed about it and rightly so.
It's like some twister game up there in your noggin.
The New York Times senior White House correspondent Maggie Haberman and reporter Kenneth Vogel are slamming Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC), saying they lied about funding for the so-called Trump dossier.
"When I tried to report this story, Clinton campaign lawyer @marceelias pushed back vigorously, saying 'You (or your sources) are wrong,' " Vogel tweeted, referring to Clinton campaign lawyer Marc Elias.
...
"Folks involved in funding this lied about it, and with sanctimony, for a year," Haberman tweeted to her more than 650,000 followers on Tuesday
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: soberbacchus
Does everyone see what we are dealing with?
Someone who not only believes the pee story, but also believes we all secretly believe it too.
This is great stuff!
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Grambler
Not only that, but they apparently are incapable of reading comprehension when it is shown that Steele himself states (in the dossier, no less) that many of his sources were indeed, wait for it...
Russian.
Cognitive dissonance doesn't even begin to cover it.