About the Vegas Killer... newest info

a reply to: queenofswords

I also thought that, it would be worth to check if any of the victims were due to the other sites paddock tried to book a room at.

a reply to: Boadicea

that's what I read too,,, he wanted to buy but the dealer was out...so this part of the story has changed as well.....

so the latest thing I read that has changed is they said he was with a prostitute...they now say there are over 200 pics from the security cameras and he is alone in every one of them

2.. the discrepency in the check in date...he checked in on the earlier date..but didn't stay there until the later date.....so....why would he do that and where was he before he actually stayed there???

originally posted by: research100
a reply to: Boadicea

that's what I read too,,, he wanted to buy but the dealer was out...so this part of the story has changed as well.....

so the latest thing I read that has changed is they said he was with a prostitute...they now say there are over 200 pics from the security cameras and he is alone in every one of them...

I've read some of those accounts also. Some say that the hotel provided him prostitutes. Maybe. But given how the story keeps changing with the wind, I'm very suspicious of these stories -- and the ones linking him to pedophilia. That seems to be the standard MO for discrediting folks nowadays. Although it's possible that Paddock was involved in undercover work for the Feds targeting pedophiles and that's the connection we're finding now.

2.. the discrepency in the check in date...he checked in on the earlier date..but didn't stay there until the later date.....so....why would he do that and where was he before he actually stayed there???

Yeah, that's one helluva moving target, eh? I've seen the Thursday morning check-in date, a Saturday morning check-in date, and now the Tuesday morning check-in date. And that's really odd because he supposedly was in Mesquite Thursday morning, buying the Ruger they cannot find now, and asking the cook at the retirement community for her enchilada recipe...

never mind.... I guess the watchers told me to delete the text as I was prompted to do, too sensitive paths I guess

follow the money is my input

a reply to: St Udio

Hmmmmm.....

PM me if you like?

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
There's absolutely NO way the official story would change in this dramatic of a fashion if this individual was not actually present. It simply does not follow in logic (any logic).

Sorry.

Actually, it makes sense that the story can dramatically shift BECAUSE he doesn't exist.

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: Willtell

Did you see the presser where just before the sheriff spoke, he introduced some man (can't remember now what his title or name was), but all the man came to the microphone to say was that from now on, this event is to be called simply
1 October.

That was it! He made a special statement just to say we will refer to this Las Vegas shooting as 1 October. He did clarify by sounding it out as "one" October. Then he left the podium.

Are you serious?! Your joking right?

If not I've got to see that

originally posted by: Willtell

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: Willtell

Did you see the presser where just before the sheriff spoke, he introduced some man (can't remember now what his title or name was), but all the man came to the microphone to say was that from now on, this event is to be called simply
1 October.

That was it! He made a special statement just to say we will refer to this Las Vegas shooting as 1 October. He did clarify by sounding it out as "one" October. Then he left the podium.

Are you serious?! Your joking right?

If not I've got to see that

True, I saw it. I even used that term in a post. I figured they wanted to get the public on board early.

a reply to: roadgravel

Interesting... that wasn't included in the video I saw of the press conference.

Why announce it? Why not just do it? Everyone will know what they're talking about...

originally posted by: roadgravel

originally posted by: Willtell

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: Willtell

Did you see the presser where just before the sheriff spoke, he introduced some man (can't remember now what his title or name was), but all the man came to the microphone to say was that from now on, this event is to be called simply
1 October.

That was it! He made a special statement just to say we will refer to this Las Vegas shooting as 1 October. He did clarify by sounding it out as "one" October. Then he left the podium.

Are you serious?! Your joking right?

If not I've got to see that

True, I saw it. I even used that term in a post. I figured they wanted to get the public on board early.

Well, I am going to call it 'October Fools Day' because I am rebellious, like that.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

Well, I am going to call it 'October Fools Day' because I am rebellious, like that.

I love it!

Hope you don't mind if I use it too

originally posted by: firerescue

I could understand they took a little time in preparing to enter a killers lair, but clear the floor?

What does that mean?

Get everybody off the floor?

Maybe its reasonable, I'm not a professional security agent. But in light of what he had done, it still make little sense.

a reply to: Willtell


Because numb nutz rifle rounds can easily penetrate multiple layers of sheetrock ........

In a gun fight against a guy with this arsenal can have stray rounds flying all over the floor

Possibility of casualties among hotel guests is high

or

Would you just leave them there as collateral damage ??

What you say is reasonable and of course I considered it.

But supposedly the guy had shot through the doors, were bullets penetrating other suits then?

Also, a guy is up in that room and can start shooting and killing many more at any time, so they take an hour.

Doesn’t make sense.

And frankly, I don’t believe they cleared out that floor.

a reply to: Boadicea

If you don't use it, then they win!

a reply to: Willtell

What is odd is in reading multiple stories, the floor was cleared when the Security Guard gave them an 'all access' key. Now, if there was a shooter would the hotel had not contacted those who were on that floor to escape?

If 200 rounds were fired and not ONE eye witness account to come forward and say they heard it or saw it or were injured? Because, as they say now, 200 rounds were fired BEFORE the cops got there so people were still in there rooms.

Also, I have stayed in plenty of hotels, even Vegas, and walls are thin. You can hear loud voice and people having sex but not hearing 200 rounds? BS....

originally posted by: roadgravel

originally posted by: Willtell

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: Willtell

Did you see the presser where just before the sheriff spoke, he introduced some man (can't remember now what his title or name was), but all the man came to the microphone to say was that from now on, this event is to be called simply
1 October.

That was it! He made a special statement just to say we will refer to this Las Vegas shooting as 1 October. He did clarify by sounding it out as "one" October. Then he left the podium.

Are you serious?! Your joking right?

If not I've got to see that

True, I saw it. I even used that term in a post. I figured they wanted to get the public on board early.

Well then that could be a rep from the hotel that doesn’t want the hotel eternally associated with this deed.


However, I do recall the op here that spoke about an occult sacrifice mentioned 10/1 was some kind of occult holiday.

Here is the link

www.abovetopsecret.com...

---
posted on Oct, 6 2017 @ 18:54
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

The timing is very convenient, maybe a way to connect ISIS with the Las Vegas shooting in the minds of those who are already suspecting that?

I hate to think it but that seems very likely to me. Don't waste LV because it can be put to good use in the narrative.


edit:

I should use the new official name "1 October".

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Boadicea

If you don't use it, then they win!

Actually... maybe that should be October Tools Day... because I don't think these guys are fools, but I definitely think they're tools for someone or something! I refuse to believe that BOTH the LVMPD and the FBI are sooooo incompetent that they got the story sooooo wrong. That just didn't happen. Someone is deliberately concocting a narrative out of whole cloth. I am seriously re-thinking everything that I cannot know for an absolute fact. And pretty much all I know for a fact is that people were shot and people were hurt and people died.

They're tools -- not fools.

a reply to: matafuchs


The idea of clearing all the guest when an active shooter has just been shooting and you know what room he’s in yet still waste an hour to me is ridiculous.

UNLESS they knew he was dead

OR they knew he had explosives in there

And how would they know that

originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: matafuchs


The idea of clearing all the guest when an active shooter has just been shooting and you know what room he’s in yet still waste an hour to me is ridiculous.

UNLESS they knew he was dead

OR they knew he had explosives in there

And how would they know that

OR
If the story we are getting is full of lies.

I wonder if the man was a US government official who is declaring the US government will use this title in the future.

The internet has shown that in general, people can name something with any name(s) they like.

If it's just his wish then go luck if people don't agree.