It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: soberbacchus
It is what leads to threads like this looking to excuse his loss.
I mean...define loss.
One definition of "Loss" is when and idiot wins the Whitehouse, but is such a fragile snowflake that he invents an embarrassing lie to excuse his loss in the popular vote...and his snowflake supporters buy in rather than acknowledge the majority of the population did not want him as President.
Another might be a President's utter failure to deliver on his campaign promises.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: soberbacchus
It is what leads to threads like this looking to excuse his loss.
I mean...define loss.
One definition of "Loss" is when and idiot wins the Whitehouse, but is such a fragile snowflake that he invents an embarrassing lie to excuse his loss in the popular vote...and his snowflake supporters buy in rather than acknowledge the majority of the population did not want him as President.
Another might be a President's utter failure to deliver on his campaign promises.
So...you are angry and you want the world to burn, cos you are angry.
As they say in Spanish "tus motivos te dilatan".
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: soberbacchus
It is what leads to threads like this looking to excuse his loss.
I mean...define loss.
One definition of "Loss" is when and idiot wins the Whitehouse, but is such a fragile snowflake that he invents an embarrassing lie to excuse his loss in the popular vote...and his snowflake supporters buy in rather than acknowledge the majority of the population did not want him as President.
Another might be a President's utter failure to deliver on his campaign promises.
So...you are angry and you want the world to burn, cos you are angry.
As they say in Spanish "tus motivos te dilatan".
So you are hateful toward the color purple...you want to burn everything colored purple..
As they say in English...
"What the eff are you blabbering about?"
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Of course the "popular vote" is irrelevant to those so desperate to cover up the fact that Trump only received 46% of the national vote.
Most people who voted didn't vote for him. Yet, you're all so "surprised" that his approval/disapproval numbers are in the toilet.
Most people that voted didn't vote for Hillary either.
So whats your point?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Of course the "popular vote" is irrelevant to those so desperate to cover up the fact that Trump only received 46% of the national vote.
Most people who voted didn't vote for him. Yet, you're all so "surprised" that his approval/disapproval numbers are in the toilet.
Most people that voted didn't vote for Hillary either.
So whats your point?
Really?
You really haven't gotten beyond the "but Hillary" stage?
The point is that the MAJORITY of the AMERICAN PEOPLE didn't want DONALD TRUMP as THEIR PRESIDENT.
Is it really that difficult to understand?
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Of course the "popular vote" is irrelevant to those so desperate to cover up the fact that Trump only received 46% of the national vote.
Most people who voted didn't vote for him. Yet, you're all so "surprised" that his approval/disapproval numbers are in the toilet.
Most people that voted didn't vote for Hillary either.
So whats your point?
Really?
You really haven't gotten beyond the "but Hillary" stage?
The point is that the MAJORITY of the AMERICAN PEOPLE didn't want DONALD TRUMP as THEIR PRESIDENT.
Is it really that difficult to understand?
Then who did the majority want?
Oh thats right, no one.
So why is this relevant again?
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: soberbacchus
In the end Trump won more states and by extension, more electoral votes = He won and Clinton lost = get over it.
Of course he won the electoral college?
Who said otherwise?
Everyone seems to agree on that.
It is Trumpkins that seem to not be able to get over the fact he lost the Popular Vote by a few million.
It is what leads to threads like this looking to excuse his loss.
It seems like Democrats who keep bringing up an irrelevant nationwide vote 9 months after the election, and you keep having to be educated on how the elections work.
???
I know how elections work?
Trump won the electoral college, which is how the US elects Presidents, but he lost the popular vote by a near unprecedented margin, which led his (and his supporters) fragile ego to invent conspiracies about millions of illegal voters to obfuscate the fact that the majority of the US populace does not want him to be President.
You seem to be the one confused?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Of course the "popular vote" is irrelevant to those so desperate to cover up the fact that Trump only received 46% of the national vote.
Most people who voted didn't vote for him. Yet, you're all so "surprised" that his approval/disapproval numbers are in the toilet.
Most people that voted didn't vote for Hillary either.
So whats your point?
Really?
You really haven't gotten beyond the "but Hillary" stage?
The point is that the MAJORITY of the AMERICAN PEOPLE didn't want DONALD TRUMP as THEIR PRESIDENT.
Is it really that difficult to understand?
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: soberbacchus
In the end Trump won more states and by extension, more electoral votes = He won and Clinton lost = get over it.
Of course he won the electoral college?
Who said otherwise?
Everyone seems to agree on that.
It is Trumpkins that seem to not be able to get over the fact he lost the Popular Vote by a few million.
It is what leads to threads like this looking to excuse his loss.
It seems like Democrats who keep bringing up an irrelevant nationwide vote 9 months after the election, and you keep having to be educated on how the elections work.
???
I know how elections work?
Trump won the electoral college, which is how the US elects Presidents, but he lost the popular vote by a near unprecedented margin, which led his (and his supporters) fragile ego to invent conspiracies about millions of illegal voters to obfuscate the fact that the majority of the US populace does not want him to be President.
You seem to be the one confused?
Clearly you don't know how the elections work.
If you did you would not still be whining about an irrelevant nationwide vote.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Of course the "popular vote" is irrelevant to those so desperate to cover up the fact that Trump only received 46% of the national vote.
Most people who voted didn't vote for him. Yet, you're all so "surprised" that his approval/disapproval numbers are in the toilet.
Most people that voted didn't vote for Hillary either.
So whats your point?
Really?
You really haven't gotten beyond the "but Hillary" stage?
The point is that the MAJORITY of the AMERICAN PEOPLE didn't want DONALD TRUMP as THEIR PRESIDENT.
Is it really that difficult to understand?
The majority of Americans have never voted for a President in the history or your country.
So what's your point?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
PS: Not to split hairs, but the person who got 2.8 Million more of those Popular Votes than Trump would actually constitute a majority of the votes received ... but you know, that's just math
www.cnn.com...
The Democrat outpaced President-elect Donald Trump by almost 2.9 million votes, with 65,844,954 (48.2%) to his 62,979,879 (46.1%), according to revised and certified final election results from all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: soberbacchus
In the end Trump won more states and by extension, more electoral votes = He won and Clinton lost = get over it.
Of course he won the electoral college?
Who said otherwise?
Everyone seems to agree on that.
It is Trumpkins that seem to not be able to get over the fact he lost the Popular Vote by a few million.
It is what leads to threads like this looking to excuse his loss.
It seems like Democrats who keep bringing up an irrelevant nationwide vote 9 months after the election, and you keep having to be educated on how the elections work.
???
I know how elections work?
Trump won the electoral college, which is how the US elects Presidents, but he lost the popular vote by a near unprecedented margin, which led his (and his supporters) fragile ego to invent conspiracies about millions of illegal voters to obfuscate the fact that the majority of the US populace does not want him to be President.
You seem to be the one confused?
Clearly you don't know how the elections work.
If you did you would not still be whining about an irrelevant nationwide vote.
But ... but ... Mr. Trump didn't think it was irrelevant in 2012 and all ...
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Gryphon66
PS: Not to split hairs, but the person who got 2.8 Million more of those Popular Votes than Trump would actually constitute a majority of the votes received ... but you know, that's just math
I love it when you get all condescending and confident, only to have to eat crow.
Umm, you do realize that Hillary only received 48.2% of the total popular vote right.
cookpolitical.com...
Even Hillarys CNN says so.
www.cnn.com...
The Democrat outpaced President-elect Donald Trump by almost 2.9 million votes, with 65,844,954 (48.2%) to his 62,979,879 (46.1%), according to revised and certified final election results from all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
But please, keep telling me how your math works.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Of course the "popular vote" is irrelevant to those so desperate to cover up the fact that Trump only received 46% of the national vote.
Most people who voted didn't vote for him. Yet, you're all so "surprised" that his approval/disapproval numbers are in the toilet.
Most people that voted didn't vote for Hillary either.
So whats your point?
Really?
You really haven't gotten beyond the "but Hillary" stage?
The point is that the MAJORITY of the AMERICAN PEOPLE didn't want DONALD TRUMP as THEIR PRESIDENT.
Is it really that difficult to understand?
Then who did the majority want?
Oh thats right, no one.
So why is this relevant again?
LOL ... it's probably not to a Trump supporter.
However, to the rest of us, it makes a lot of sense.
PS: Not to split hairs, but the person who got 2.8 Million more of those Popular Votes than Trump would actually constitute a majority of the votes received ... but you know, that's just math.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Of course the "popular vote" is irrelevant to those so desperate to cover up the fact that Trump only received 46% of the national vote.
Most people who voted didn't vote for him. Yet, you're all so "surprised" that his approval/disapproval numbers are in the toilet.
Most people that voted didn't vote for Hillary either.
So whats your point?
Really?
You really haven't gotten beyond the "but Hillary" stage?
The point is that the MAJORITY of the AMERICAN PEOPLE didn't want DONALD TRUMP as THEIR PRESIDENT.
Is it really that difficult to understand?
The majority of Americans have never voted for a President in the history or your country.
So what's your point?
You do know that the word "majority" (both in British and American English I believe) means "the greater number" ... right?
originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: Grambler
Have you seen this math?
projects.fivethirtyeight.com...
The lowest presidential approval in modern history...
You guys keep patting yourself on the back for this embarrassment to the world.
Let's see how that works out for you in 2018 and 2020.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Of course the "popular vote" is irrelevant to those so desperate to cover up the fact that Trump only received 46% of the national vote.
Most people who voted didn't vote for him. Yet, you're all so "surprised" that his approval/disapproval numbers are in the toilet.
Most people that voted didn't vote for Hillary either.
So whats your point?
Really?
You really haven't gotten beyond the "but Hillary" stage?
The point is that the MAJORITY of the AMERICAN PEOPLE didn't want DONALD TRUMP as THEIR PRESIDENT.
Is it really that difficult to understand?
Then who did the majority want?
Oh thats right, no one.
So why is this relevant again?
LOL ... it's probably not to a Trump supporter.
However, to the rest of us, it makes a lot of sense.
PS: Not to split hairs, but the person who got 2.8 Million more of those Popular Votes than Trump would actually constitute a majority of the votes received ... but you know, that's just math.