It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sebatwerk
Originally posted by staver
As for the moderator, and I can't believe this came from one, and that no one else has jumped all over it yet, I can't even begin to list the things that are wrong with the statement "why the hell should they have to do that". That, in essence, is what is wrong with the majority of our world. That type of indifference absolutely makes my skin crawl.
What's wrong with this? They earned their money, why should they have to give it away. It would be NICE if they were more charitable, but they shouldn't HAVE to be. Are you a communist? Socialist? THAT type of indifference for someone's own property, just because they have a lot of it, makes MY skin crawl.
Originally posted by MidnightDStroyer
Check some details on how the Federal Reserve Bank operates.
...
So the US is corporate owned...By a foreign-originated corporation, no less.
Look around & you can see that more people than ever are unemployed because major corporations are going down in scandal...Or even merely massively "downsizing" & putting people out of work. No jobs... Yeah, the US is doing real good with this system.
Originally posted by sebatwerk
Our property cannot be taken from us.
Yes it can because it's not our property anymore.
Anytime you purchase the deed to some land, that deed describes you as the "tenant", not the owner. If the land was truly yours, then you wouldn't have to owe "property taxes" to anybody.
If the land was truly yours, then you wouldn't have to owe "property taxes" to anybody. Because that deed describes you as tenant, that legally implies that someone else actually owns the land. Since your "property taxes go to the government, guess who actually owns it?
Check the real estate laws concerning "aluvial land" if you want to see it for yourself.
All of this is documented fact, so is there anything else you need clarified?
The Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, Forty-first Congress, Session III, Chapter 62, page 419, chartered a Federal company entitled “United States,” a/k/a “US Inc.,” a “Commercial Agency” originally designated as “Washington, D.C.,” in accordance with the so-called 14th Amendment, which the record indicates was never ratified (see Utah Supreme Court Cases, Dyett v Turner, (1968) 439 P2d 266, 267; State v Phillips, (1975) 540 P 2d 936; as well as Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 448, 59 S. Ct. 972; 28 Tulane Law Review, 22; 11 South Carolina Law Quarterly 484; Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646). A “citizen of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.
In conformity with the above-referenced creation of United States (1871) and the 14th Amendment, the Legislature of each State created a limited-liability corporation, chartered in a private, military, international, commercial, admiralty/maritime jurisdiction, entitled “STATE OF…” e.g. “STATE OF CALIFORNIA,” as evidenced by, inter alia, the change in the seal and the creation of a new constitution, e.g. Constitution of the State of California (1879), concerning which, re California:
a. A general partnership agreement, hereinafter “General Partnership,” exists between the California Republic (1849), and STATE OF CALIFORNIA (1879), with STATE OF CALIFORNIA acting as governmental controller.
b. STATE OF CALIFORNIA now acts as an agent/instrumentality of United States, collecting whole life insurance premiums, known as “taxes,” for the International Monetary Fund, based, inter alia, upon the Limited Liability Act of 1851 and the bankruptcy of United States of 1933, see House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933; Public Law 73-10; Perry v. U.S. (1935), 294 U.S. 330-381, 79 L Ed 912; 31 USC 5112, 5119.
Originally posted by ThinkB4uSpeak
Just a thought...
If every multi billionaire were to havea secret meeting or just talk to eachother about using their money together to control different and many parts of the world...Why dont you think they could take over the world? With money comes followers and power...Hitler almoust did it by himself...I know it was different times but these days i feel people are even more money hungry and greedy and ruthless...Dont think it cant happen
Originally posted by MidnightDStroyer
Originally posted by sebatwerk
Our property cannot be taken from us.
Yes it can because it's not our property anymore. Anytime you purchase the deed to some land, that deed describes you as the "tenant", not the owner. If the land was truly yours, then you wouldn't have to owe "property taxes" to anybody. Because that deed describes you as tenant, that legally implies that someone else actually owns the land. Since your "property taxes" go to the government, guess who actually owns it?
Check the real estate laws concerning "aluvial land" if you want to see it for yourself.
Originally posted by Esoterica: Just because someone wants a new order doesn't mean it actually exists.
Originally posted by AlwaysLearning
Originally posted by bpletcj
AlwaysLearning.
Dude you live in Canada, I think your safe from the big bad USA and the NWO
Bud - I don't think any of us are safe...and its not just the big bad USA. All's I know is that rich and powerful people keep getting richer and more powerful and its not their kids that get killed fighting in the streets of Iraq. Just one small example. Why world hunger when there are rich people who could feed the world and it wouldn't even make a dent in their bank accounts??? You have a wonder...even just a little bit.
I prefer to be suspicious and question everything that doesn't smell right. That's a personal choice...you do what you like.
Originally posted by imAMERICAN
even if there was, it would be impossible to enforce, the civilized world is too big, it would take BILLIONS OF TROOPS to occupy the world...who would finance this? who would supply the men, and why would the world crumble to a few dozen people...
Originally posted by iksmodnad
why would you want to control the whole world, you would have to worry about taking care of every body, not only that your money would be so wide spread you could not even support your own government, not to mention 7 billion people against an army and a dictator.
Originally posted by imAMERICAN even if there was, it would be impossible to enforce, the civilized world is too big, it would take BILLIONS OF TROOPS to occupy the world...who would finance this? who would supply the men, and why would the world crumble to a few dozen people...
its a big LIE
Originally posted by imAMERICAN
your all being paranoid, there is NO NWO, none!
its a figment of your imagination
there is no secret society rigging elections
there is no one plotting, well maybe terrorists but no nwo
even if there was, it would be impossible to enforce, the civilized world is too big, it would take BILLIONS OF TROOPS to occupy the world...who would finance this? who would supply the men, and why would the world crumble to a few dozen people...
its a big LIE
and your all falling for it
i dont mean to be mean, but open your eyes, its ridiculus, bloodlines, secret societies.... rubbish, its all rubbish...
who ever started this idea was either paranoid or stupid... wake up sheeple
WAKE UP!