Billionaire George Soros fuels Democrats’ push to lower voting age to 17

a reply to: infolurker>>>> Last night on Coast to Coast AM they had a guest on that was very critical of Soros and backed up everything he said. I wished I could have heard the whole segment, the guy just made sense and presented a very non partisan view of the political and societal situation we're in. But, he had shills email George Noory defending Soros even though there was damning evidence against him. Soros is like a ghoul, he grows fat and rich on the destruction of those around him.

I don't think voting rights should be determined by age, but rather IQ, taxes paid, previous crimes etc.
Well, I think a lot of factors should come into play, a rationality test would be great...

Asking to much already, I'll stick to IQ being the main denominator.

a reply to: infolurker

No worries, because Democrats are weak and never push for much of anything. They're the polar opposite of the Republicans who never shut up about their issues, whether it's BS or not.

It's like the Democrats wealthy donors command them to be weak, meek, & most of all... quiet.

a reply to: GreenGunther

Agreed anyone with an iq under 110 shouldn't be allowed to vote,voting is a system for intelligensia not dumbed down sheep,

a reply to: khnum

I was thinking 140+?

If we want sh*t to work out we should put our trust in the most intelligent individuals.
Although I think empathy tests should be passed by the grand puba's of whatever political system this would be referred to as.

a reply to: infolurker

This should put in question the claims of voting fraud.

a reply to: infolurker

I hope he's counter challenged and the age is instead raised. . .to 25.

What a great guy George Soros is.....killed his own people while robbing them....Guess not much has changed.

a reply to: LSU0408

That would probably start a civil war faster than all the post election "reality tv" drama that has been going on.

a reply to: infolurker

Im for making the voting age 26 since the democrats think they need to be covered under their parents healthcare until then.

originally posted by: c2oden

originally posted by: TruMcCarthy
If anything the voting age should be raised. Young people are idiots with no real world experience. I'm horrified by my teenage stupidity.

Exactly. They want more people who feel rather than think to vote before they begin thinking for themselves.

Great...more whiners who think the world owes them something, that money grows on trees and that these isn't evil in the world. While it means the end of America as we know it, it would be fun to watch them get their asses kicked...majorly.

a reply to: infolurker

How is this bozo still allowed to do anything in the US? He's not even a Citizen.

super bad idea

even if soros thinks young people would vote democratic, bernie found out they post about their views on their phone, but they don't show up to vote

a reply to: infolurker

a reply to: infolurker

Ah yes, higher voter turnout among the high schoolers... on a school day.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

I believe they actually are allowed to drink on base. They are here in Missouri, at least; my son joined the Missouri National Guard right before he turned 18, and though he didn't take advantage of it, he could have had a drink while on base during his AIT (job training program, 5 months on base) while he was 18/19.

a reply to: syrinx high priest

I was wondering when someone would say that.

Support outside of the ballot box means little to nothing in the grand scheme of things, or getting nominated anyway.

a reply to: GreenGunther

...and IQ equates to wisdom in what world?

Given what I've heard come out of the mouths/keyboards of presumed intelligent people in my fifty years on this benighted planet, gives the lie to the notion that intelligence is the be all end all of qualification to vote.

17 is to young so is 18 even 21 but that is subjective and a per person bases is imposible

A line in the sand was drawn at 18 leave it be

Can we have a age limit
I think progress could happen alot faster this way
If ur say 3 generations behind are u really voting to make the changes needed or just trying stop progress