It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Pyle
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
You are describing the jobs of the chief of staffs not the Sec def.
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Pyle
With tons of experience and expertise.
He has the respect of not just the Marine Corp, but every other branch.
He's well trusted among the troops and for good reasons.
You and I will just have to agree to disagree on this one.
Mattis faced plenty of competition along the way,
including retired Army Gen. Jack Keane, former Republican
Sen. Jim Talent of Missouri, and others.
Keane reportedly declined Trump's offer to serve at the
Pentagon but recommended Mattis for the position.
PS only 85 rounds? They short-sheeted ya for that meetup.
originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: Konduit
Good to know silly 8th grade school machismo is now something to be lauded. I'll bet you think its cool when a man beats his wife because the silly woman wouldn't make him a sandwich. The machismo think is for week insecure ego driven children who as so afraid of how the world views them that they have to overcompensate with some comical display of male dominance.
originally posted by: Shuye
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan
“4. Find the enemy that wants to end this experiment (in American democracy) and kill every one of them until they’re so sick of the killing that they leave us and our freedoms intact.”
I find it a highly ignorant thing to say. This guy believes some people hate the US because of freedom? No, people hate the US because they go to random countries and bomb the # out of them. There's a difference.
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: WUNK22
Why would liberals be afraid of a military vet as Secretary of Defense? That only makes sense and did you know there are military members who aren't Republican? Crazy right?
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: projectvxn
originally posted by: Pyle
Don't like this pick. We have enough generals in the military. We don't need a retired one in the 2nd Highest Civilian position in the Military.
Well after 8 years of using the military for social engineering and SJW bull# it's nice to have someone who will bring back the warrior spirit.
Seems like regression.
originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: Konduit
Good to know silly 8th grade school machismo is now something to be lauded. I'll bet you think its cool when a man beats his wife because the silly woman wouldn't make him a sandwich. The machismo think is for week insecure ego driven children who as so afraid of how the world views them that they have to overcompensate with some comical display of male dominance.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: Konduit
Good to know silly 8th grade school machismo is now something to be lauded. I'll bet you think its cool when a man beats his wife because the silly woman wouldn't make him a sandwich. The machismo think is for week insecure ego driven children who as so afraid of how the world views them that they have to overcompensate with some comical display of male dominance.
You fight fire with fire dont you?
originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: Shamrock6
Not at all. You have outed yourself as exactly what I've described. Combat is brutal, ugly, and nothing to be lauded or held up in high regard (unless you think that killing is a morally good thing). What he should apologize for is implying that because someone is against war they are a 'pussy' which is exactly like I described: an over-compensatory macho driven ego.
originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: Konduit
Good to know silly 8th grade school machismo is now something to be lauded. I'll bet you think its cool when a man beats his wife because the silly woman wouldn't make him a sandwich. The machismo think is for week insecure ego driven children who as so afraid of how the world views them that they have to overcompensate with some comical display of male dominance.