ATS made the list. We are somebody now

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: Blaine91555


He's a twat as well!

Yes, but he is just so damn funny -

a reply to: LesMisanthrope


good point...

the list of the 'Accused' .... are just like the victims of the Hollywood Blacklist of actors (M & F) back over 50 years ago

So I recommend that a class action suit be filed against the WAPO for a certain amount of bad publicity that keeps the timid from joining ATS under the threat of being labeled in sympathy with Russian Spy & Hacking intrusions into American businesses/politics/web-sites


The DNC is just as guilty of slurs,
it was the DNC who first pointed fingers at Trump inviting Putin to use the Russian cyber Hack brigade to hack the appropriate cache houses for the 'missing' and hard-to-find 30,000 Hillary-E-mails...

and hack the Clinton Foundation for the Pay-to-play memos, for over 5 years, which were sent by Huma to her private computer files on her private laptop that Weiner sorta hijacked -- unawares of anything sensitive or national security classified on the laptop secret files of Huma Abiden the Aide extradinaire

Yup, as I figured it would eventually. Funny enough these so called writers, etc., of the list fell for that ATS is only RW leaning maybe heavily so but not fully on that side at all. At least that how I seen people on the MSM leaning sites refer to this site as in particular.

a reply to: St Udio

Sir, are you now or have you ever been, someone what wants the actual truth?"

Da, comrade, emyergency, emyergency... everyone to get from street....

Kinda strange www.youtube.com was never mentioned as a fake news site considering most hoaxes and other left or right wing videos in articles stem from them?

Yay lists!

a reply to: anonentity

That's the New York Times, not WaPo. BTW, Carlos Slim owns a stake in NYT that is below 20% IIRC.

this is as bad as Hillary calling trump supporters deplorables, now all ats people are Russian propaganda stooges.

a reply to: DBCowboy

... are you now or have you ever been, someone what wants the actual truth?"

[more

I'm just using the ongoing 'spirit of the times' language we are all quite familiar with...
[[...zeit·geist: Noun,
the defining spirit or mood of a particular period of history as shown by the ideas and beliefs of the time]]


the supposed Russian Hacking rumor was initiated when Trump spoke to the general audience & said...

Maybe we should ask Putin to find the missing 30,000 emails that Hillary lost...
he meant the line as a joke.. since the USA intel agencies couldn't seem to find their nose on their face,


the MSM, Globalist intelligenzia, lefties, DNC, elites like rockerfellas/kissingers/brzezinskis, all got-on-the-same-page and made the foolish & absurd statement that Putin-Trump were in secret cahoots..& the Russians tried & did manipulate the recent voter election counts... & the NEWS & American media



whats your question, again ?

a reply to: Blaine91555

Strange that CNN and MSNBC are not on that list because I'm pretty sure it was one of those outlets that first spruiked the idea that the Russians hacked the elections or something.

Also, that crazy alt-right conspiracist, Hillary Clinton, is constantly hinting that Vlad and Trump are bedroom buddies.

So, IMO, fake news, BS 'polls' and propaganda stems from hillaryclinton.com, cnn.com and msnbc.com.

They have a facebook pressence (I'm not on facebook) anyone care to go and have a look?
It would be nice to see who these chaps are.

I checked the facebook page. Less info there than on this thread. The about says the same "we are a group" statement. 2 photos posted by someone else. Both of Jill Stein at the table with Putin.

That was pretty much it except for the "hate" of Trump including "locker room" words - OMG!!!!

a reply to: Sublimecraft

It's just propaganda about propaganda.

They relied on software to find those on their list and under their criteria, it seems to me a site where people were discussing the topics of Russia and elections would be added, even if they were just trying to work out the truth.

Methodology

We use a combination of manual and automated analysis, including analysis of content, timing, technical indicators, and other reporting, in order to initially identify (“red-flag”) and then confirm an outlet as Russian propaganda. Our volunteers have developed a suite of software tools, leveraging publicly available data and commercial services, in order to perform automated analysis, but everything we do is in principle replicable using manual searching and data entry.

We initially red-flag a new site based on content-based criteria like those outlined above. Does it:

Consistently cite official state-owned and semi-official Russian propaganda outlets?
Consistently reuse text directly from official state-owned and semi-official Russian propaganda outlets?
Have a history of generally echoing the Russian propaganda "line", especially in ways unrelated to the purported focus of their branding, and in sequence with other Russian propaganda outlets?
Has it been called out by other fact-checkers, researchers, journalists, and debunkers for posting fake news?

From there we use our software tools to fill in the blanks, collecting a wide range of data about the new target site, and seeing how it fits into the existing network of previously red-flagged and identified outlets. We have built out a significant network of websites, and every time we feel confidant that we have discovered most of them, we keep finding more.

In the process of doing this, we have also identified a significant set of YouTube channels, Facebook pages, Twitter accounts, etc, which are acting as part of the same larger Russian influence operation.

They clearly think anyone just discussing this is a propaganda outlet by association.

Lol. This thread is getting close to the site owners dark secret. I'd mention it, but then I'd have a few of my recent posts deleted and warned in private not to discuss such things.

You're all being taken. Alt right rubes.

originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: ezramullins

What a great list to get alternative news from.

I never knew educating people about their founding republic was considered a goal of Russian propaganda

thefederalistpapers.org...

Leftist Site Claims U.S. CONSTITUTION Is ‘Russian Propaganda

It is a great list and I was not familiar with some of them. I was concerned that I might be spanked for providing the list. That is why I only linked instead of posting the list itself.
I did not expect arguments, though. I thought everyone would just find it as funny as I do.

the OP is just fake news

This. Is. Hilarious.

WaPo...of Watergate fame...and THIS is what it's come to? Gawd, this BS hit piece has destroyed any faith I had left in the media, which,admittedly, wasn't much. I just hope Springer and SkepticOverlord can partner with Crakeur and the legals and figure out some way to sue the ever-loving # out of WaPo.

I'd post some Putin pic but I can't be arsed, that's how stupid this is. Someone send the WaPo editorial board a copy of Orwell's book.

a reply to: kosmicjack

This may be more descriptive.

a reply to: kosmicjack


"It was a cold morning in April and the clocks struck thirteen"

I am very confused once again. Free thought site labeled propaganda by those that support government controlling what is labeled hate speech. A government so entrenched it has the power to control the day to day happiness of its population? Those that support groups that rely on slow poisoning through infiltration than an open debate of ideas? For what? Believing in a government 18 trillion in debt is to big to fail to provide healthcare and daily essentials. How well is the USSR central government providing for its citizens now? No government is to big to fail. Only you hold your families best interest at heart. Not politicians looking for useful idiots.

If the creators of ATS had the power of foresight to create such a powerful Russian propaganda site in advance for this specific election, who can stand in their way of world domination? I guess the Hillary paid trolls were not pulling their weight.

Sorry, just another rant that will not impact those that only want to leach of social programs than working to fund social programs.