**BREAKING** Donald Trump rushed from stage due to threat

Or more precisely, a man with no right to protest in that area violently pushes his way to the front of the crowd

Violently? If you call "gently pushing" and "can I please come through" violent then the delusion is stronger in you than I thought.

and someone in the crowd sees him reach inside his jacket as he is pushing his way forward. The crowd shout 'he has a gun' and the crowd and secret service wrestle him to the ground and eject him into the street.

Simple really.

Oh so now he "reached inside his jacket" did he? Proof please. What took you so long to bring this up I wonder? Did deflection and calling everyone you disagree with "partisan" not work out for you so you are trying a different tactic.....making stuff up again?

All I know is that prohibiting guns at a Trump rally is a violation of First Amendment rights. Trump should insist that the Secret Service permit open carry in his presence, especially should he be elected.

originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: Kryties

He looked remarkably unmarked for a man beaten and kicked.
It looked to me like he was being restrained.

He also had no right to violently force his way to the front of the crowd to protest.

Everything that happened was of his own making, which was likely his plan. Still his $1500 will help him get over it.

Did you examine him? Where's your evidence that he was remarkably unmarked? Can you see through clothing?

Why do you say he violently forced his way to the front of the crowd? Do you have evidence of this?

No, being piled on by five or more people (according to reports) is not justified by holding up a sign.

Do you have any evidence that he "planned" to be attacked?

Do you have any evidence that anyone was paying him to be there?

Do you, in short, have evidence for any of the assertions that you're blandly making, or, as is typical, are these your own partisan opinions that you present as fact?

originally posted by: DJW001
All I know is that prohibiting guns at a Trump rally is a violation of First Amendment rights. Trump should insist that the Secret Service permit open carry in his presence, especially should he be elected.

That would be consistent with the philosophy.

Why isn't a Trump rally open carry?

Does Mr. Trump hate the Second Amendment?

originally posted by: Kryties

Or more precisely, a man with no right to protest in that area violently pushes his way to the front of the crowd

Violently? If you call "gently pushing" and "can I please come through" violent then the delusion is stronger in you than I thought.

and someone in the crowd sees him reach inside his jacket as he is pushing his way forward. The crowd shout 'he has a gun' and the crowd and secret service wrestle him to the ground and eject him into the street.

Simple really.

Oh so now he "reached inside his jacket" did he? Proof please. What took you so long to bring this up I wonder? Did deflection and calling everyone you disagree with "partisan" not work out for you so you are trying a different tactic.....making stuff up again?

Eye witnesses say violently.
You will notice in the video that Trump supporters are indeed on the ground and getting back up.
Here is another video showing the start of the incident. There is no crowd violence as the man is restrained.



Your language like 'beat the bejesus' out of him has no basis at all other than from the man himself (who had no marks on him at all). However, you dishonestly pushed this narrative whilst discarding other eye witness.

It seem to me like #onlysomefactsmatter to you.

a reply to: Gryphon66

So no guns allowed at trump rallies?.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Why isn't a Trump rally open carry?

Because his entire life has been fear based.

a reply to: UKTruth

You must have x-ray vision. The camera wasn't on the protester during the period you're claiming knowledge of.

You can't see anything "clearly" ... except of course, what you wish to see.

BTW, just out of curiosity, how many rows of people do you count there? LOL.

a reply to: UKTruth

The only picture we have of the protestor up close is of his face, which looked a little bruised to me. How on Earth can you make the assumption he "had no marks on him" from a headshot? Can you see through clothes also? Did you take a look at the mans testicles to see if his claim about someone grabbing them was correct? I think not.

Stop making stuff up.

originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: Gryphon66

So no guns allowed at trump rallies?.

Apparently, Trump is afraid of paper.

I can't imagine how he'd react if someone actually had a sidearm.

I guess Trump Rallies are safe spaces for haters of the 2nd.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: Gryphon66

So no guns allowed at trump rallies?.

Apparently, Trump is afraid of paper.

As, it seems, are his supporters.

a reply to: UKTruth

So it turns out that it was not a paid Hillary assassin, he was a republican and he was met with physical resistance from Trump supporters.

Very interesting.

Doesn't fit the narrative you tried to push, does it?

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: Gryphon66

So no guns allowed at trump rallies?.

Apparently, Trump is afraid of paper.

I can't imagine how he'd react if someone actually had a sidearm.

I guess Trump Rallies are safe spaces for haters of the 2nd.

Aha. The objectivity is gone.

Actually as I know you want to keep to the facts... someone shouted 'gun'. At the time Trump was calmly looking on. Nothing seems to scare him. Incredibly tough, really. The west needs more leaders just like him.
He only left the stage when the Secret Service moved in and then came back out and later went off to another rally. Respect.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Mind you imagine what could have happened if guns were allowed when the idiot shouted gun.
Moron who ever did it.

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth

So it turns out that it was not a paid Hillary assassin, he was a republican and he was met with physical resistance from Trump supporters.

Very interesting.

Doesn't fit the narrative you tried to push, does it?

He was a Hillary supporter and named via wikileaks documents as an asset for these kinds of political activities.
Hillary domestic terrorist, no doubt.

a reply to: flatbush71

From what little I've seen this morning, the question arose as to whether this man at the rally and the person named in the dumps is the same person. Does anyone know if this has been established?

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth

Doesn't fit the narrative you tried to push, does it?

"Tried" would indicate past tense. He is still trying.

"Failing dismally" would be another term I would use to describe it.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth

So it turns out that it was not a paid Hillary assassin, he was a republican and he was met with physical resistance from Trump supporters.

Very interesting.

Doesn't fit the narrative you tried to push, does it?

He was a Hillary supporter and named via wikileaks documents as an asset for these kinds of political activities.
Hillary domestic terrorist, no doubt.

Really? Have a link for that? I have yet to see any media outlet suggest that. Even Fox.

originally posted by: Kryties
a reply to: UKTruth

The only picture we have of the protestor up close is of his face, which looked a little bruised to me. How on Earth can you make the assumption he "had no marks on him" from a headshot? Can you see through clothes also? Did you take a look at the mans testicles to see if his claim about someone grabbing them was correct? I think not.

Stop making stuff up.

Looked a little bruised? Lol. Doesn't really fit the 'beat the bejesus' out of him lies, eh?
He was restrained after becoming violent, according to eye witnesses.
What's the matter, are the facts not so important after all if they don't go your way?

a reply to: UKTruth

So protesters against your guy are domestic terrorists?.Wow you are too far gone.
Please change your name so we in the uk can not be associated with you.