**BREAKING** Donald Trump rushed from stage due to threat

originally posted by: UKTruth

I see , so your hyperbole was semantics. Gotcha.

Something tells me you don't know the definition of the word "semantics". This does not surprise me.

Have you spoken to the man who shouted gun? Did he say he mistook the cardboard sign for a gun?

No, have you? You tried to claim earlier that the protestor "reached inside his jacket" which prompted them to yell " gun" but when asked to provide proof of this claim you fell silent and deflected onto other topics, again.

To me it's pretty logical that a cardboard sign looks nothing like a gun. To me it also seems logical that the man was too busy holding up said sign to "reach inside his jacket" as you so claim (with no evidence).

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: UKTruth

Does it kill you that you can't vote?.Appears you are not gonna change minds here no one is either way. Do you work for trump?. Or just fancy him? is it the hair lol.
I mean many here can see both candidates are crap why do you defend everything trump?.

LOL. UK explains their interest in Trump in a lot of ways ... for example, they live in the UK but aren't British, and they're "just really interested in American politics."

It's an interesting tale, to say the least.

I have been amazed that a Brit always manages to tout the day's talking points from Breitbart and Fox.

Is it only British that live in Britain, then? You know, quite a few nationalities live here. Anyone legally here is always welcome.
As for American politics, well yes it is interesting, primarily because of the Primary process which is quite different to here.
What's your point?

a reply to: UKTruth

He was violent.

The word more does not really have an affect on the word precisely - except for those who want to appear more factual than they really are

:-)

Someone in the crowd shouted he had a gun after seeing him reach for something (not as a result of seeing a sign as is being dishonestly discussed as fact when it is not). The crowd and then the police wrestled the man to the ground and restrained him. The man was ejected and let go.

Story I heard was someone called out he has a gun after he was being assaulted

Funny - I can't know that because I wasn't there. It's what someone said

Hope that helps you out.

It helped me to see that for you factiness is a lot like precision

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: UKTruth

Does it kill you that you can't vote?.Appears you are not gonna change minds here no one is either way. Do you work for trump?. Or just fancy him? is it the hair lol.
I mean many here can see both candidates are crap why do you defend everything trump?.

LOL. UK explains their interest in Trump in a lot of ways ... for example, they live in the UK but aren't British, and they're "just really interested in American politics."

It's an interesting tale, to say the least.

I have been amazed that a Brit always manages to tout the day's talking points from Breitbart and Fox.

Is it only British that live in Britain, then? You know, quite a few nationalities live here. Anyone legally here is always welcome.
As for American politics, well yes it is interesting, primarily because of the Primary process which is quite different to here.
What's your point?

You mean Britons?

DId I say something that offended you? I was just telling the story you've told several times freely here in explanation of why you're so up-to-date on American politics.

Beg pardon if I gave offense somehow. I didn't know you were sensitive on the subject.

originally posted by: Kryties

originally posted by: UKTruth

I see , so your hyperbole was semantics. Gotcha.

Something tells me you don't know the definition of the word "semantics". This does not surprise me.

Have you spoken to the man who shouted gun? Did he say he mistook the cardboard sign for a gun?

No, have you? You tried to claim earlier that the protestor "reached inside his jacket" which prompted them to yell " gun" but when asked to provide proof of this claim you fell silent and deflected onto other topics, again.

To me it's pretty logical that a cardboard sign looks nothing like a gun. To me it also seems logical that the man was too busy holding up said sign to "reach inside his jacket" as you so claim (with no evidence).

So you have no evidence then... but you are willing to speculate anyway. Understood.
So now we know you have no evidence that a cardboard sign was seen and someone saw the cardboard and mistook it for a gun AND you have no evidence that the man had the 'bejesus' beaten out of him, it kind of shreds your entire position.
You were speculating and dressing it up as fact.
How dishonest!

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: UKTruth

Does it kill you that you can't vote?.Appears you are not gonna change minds here no one is either way. Do you work for trump?. Or just fancy him? is it the hair lol.
I mean many here can see both candidates are crap why do you defend everything trump?.

LOL. UK explains their interest in Trump in a lot of ways ... for example, they live in the UK but aren't British, and they're "just really interested in American politics."

It's an interesting tale, to say the least.

I have been amazed that a Brit always manages to tout the day's talking points from Breitbart and Fox.

Is it only British that live in Britain, then? You know, quite a few nationalities live here. Anyone legally here is always welcome.
As for American politics, well yes it is interesting, primarily because of the Primary process which is quite different to here.
What's your point?

You mean Britons?

DId I say something that offended you? I was just telling the story you've told several times freely here in explanation of why you're so up-to-date on American politics.

Beg pardon if I gave offense somehow. I didn't know you were sensitive on the subject.

I was just wondering what it has to do with the thread topic. You seem to be making some kind of veiled accusation, but at the same time don't seem brave enough or man enough to make it. Come on man, take some inspiration from Trump. He is brave enough to say what he thinks!

You seem upset that Hillary has been paying domestic terrorists again. Is that why you are resorting to a more personal effort?

I'll say it again. This man accomplished what he set out to do and that was to capture everyone's attention. All eyes on him. If he'd stayed where he was with his sign, I doubt any of what ensued would have occurred.

Trying to maneuver to the front of a crowd, any crowd, without having the "authority" to do so is going to annoy the heck out of people. Try it sometime and see what kind of reactions you get. It's like trying to cut ahead in a line.

a reply to: UKTruth

Mate, I have given multitudes of actual evidence throughout this thread. You, on the other hand, have made a whole bunch of claims then when asked for proof have instead deflected or outright ignored those requests.

Anyone with eyes and half a brain can see this mate.

a reply to: tweetie

When someone cuts into a line ahead of me I generally don't resort to beating, kicking, chokeholding or grabbing their testicles - then shouting gun at a sign.

I tend to be a bit more adult about it than that.

originally posted by: Kryties
a reply to: UKTruth

Mate, I have given multitudes of actual evidence throughout this thread. You, on the other hand, have made a whole bunch of claims then when asked for proof have instead deflected or outright ignored those requests.

Anyone with eyes and half a brain can see this mate.

You have given no evidence at all.
The only facts are that a man protested when he did not have the right to, someone shouted 'gun', the man was restrained and then ejected, eye witnesses said he was violent, and he said he was beaten up.

You concocted the rest from there.

a reply to: UKTruth

Tell me, please, what I "concocted". With evidence.

Go on, I'm waiting.......

originally posted by: Kryties
a reply to: tweetie

When someone cuts into a line ahead of me I generally don't resort to beating, kicking, chokeholding or grabbing their testicles - then shouting gun at a sign.

I tend to be a bit more adult about it than that.

Where is the evidence he just 'cut in line'? Eye witnesses said he was violently pushing people to the ground including women and children.
Are you making things up again?

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: UKTruth

Does it kill you that you can't vote?.Appears you are not gonna change minds here no one is either way. Do you work for trump?. Or just fancy him? is it the hair lol.
I mean many here can see both candidates are crap why do you defend everything trump?.

LOL. UK explains their interest in Trump in a lot of ways ... for example, they live in the UK but aren't British, and they're "just really interested in American politics."

It's an interesting tale, to say the least.

I have been amazed that a Brit always manages to tout the day's talking points from Breitbart and Fox.

Is it only British that live in Britain, then? You know, quite a few nationalities live here. Anyone legally here is always welcome.
As for American politics, well yes it is interesting, primarily because of the Primary process which is quite different to here.
What's your point?

You mean Britons?

DId I say something that offended you? I was just telling the story you've told several times freely here in explanation of why you're so up-to-date on American politics.

Beg pardon if I gave offense somehow. I didn't know you were sensitive on the subject.

I was just wondering what it has to do with the thread topic. You seem to be making some kind of veiled accusation, but at the same time don't seem brave enough or man enough to make it. Come on man, take some inspiration from Trump. He is brave enough to say what he thinks!

You seem upset that Hillary has been paying domestic terrorists again.

Veiled accusation?

You're wildly exaggerating the truth here today UKTruth. What it has to do with the thread topic? Nothing. Sometimes though, you know, we sort of acknowledge each other as human beings who are posting here, so that's really all that was.

I've never had any problem saying what I think ... I think you're taking on traits of your cult leader ... you seem to be getting really thin-skinned and reactive, you contradict yourself about once or twice a paragraph, and you've totally fabricated knowledge about the Reno rally while trying to critique others for having "no evidence."

Since you asked for my opinion, I'd say you're being incredibly emotional and fairly hypocritical here.

The facts are very clear. A Republican got jumped at a Trump rally, was beaten for holding a sign.

Those are the facts. Everything else, including your presentation, is speculation.

originally posted by: tweetie
I'll say it again. This man accomplished what he set out to do and that was to capture everyone's attention. All eyes on him. If he'd stayed where he was with his sign, I doubt any of what ensued would have occurred.

Trying to maneuver to the front of a crowd, any crowd, without having the "authority" to do so is going to annoy the heck out of people. Try it sometime and see what kind of reactions you get. It's like trying to cut ahead in a line.

So it's okay to pile on and beat another person for walking to the front of an auditorium?

Wow, you Trump supporters are tough.

a reply to: UKTruth

Oh for Christs sake mate, I was replying to the other bloke who made a COMPARISON. Way to get it completely wrong in your zeal to try proving me wrong.

READ before you post.

originally posted by: Kryties
a reply to: UKTruth

Tell me, please, what I "concocted". With evidence.

Go on, I'm waiting.......

I already have. Your two concoctions, positioned as facts, are that someone saw the sign and thought the cardboard sign was a firearm and that the man had the 'bejesus' beaten out of him. A third is more recent that the man just 'cut in line' .

You have nothing to back you up.

originally posted by: Kryties
a reply to: UKTruth

Oh for Christs sake mate, I was replying to the other bloke who made a COMPARISON. Way to get it completely wrong in your zeal to try proving me wrong.

READ before you post.

Nope. You were replying to someone who said 'it's like trying to cut in line'.
You implied that is what the agitator was doing by linking your other made up events to such an act, with no evidence. Again.

a reply to: UKTruth

Ive already answered both, you just skipped over those posts. You seem to make a habit of that.

While you're making accusations of "concocting" though, please explain your claim that he "reached inside his jacket". I asked before for evidence and, as usual, you ignored that request. Then you hypocritically claim that IM concocting stories. Nice try at deflection mate, very pathetic of you.

a reply to: UKTruth

You can continue thinking that, and trying to make an issue out of nothing, until the cows come home. It will never make it true.

Now stop deflecting and show your evidence that he "reached inside his jacket" or admit that you hypocritically concocted that story from thin air.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: tweetie
I'll say it again. This man accomplished what he set out to do and that was to capture everyone's attention. All eyes on him. If he'd stayed where he was with his sign, I doubt any of what ensued would have occurred.

Trying to maneuver to the front of a crowd, any crowd, without having the "authority" to do so is going to annoy the heck out of people. Try it sometime and see what kind of reactions you get. It's like trying to cut ahead in a line.

So it's okay to pile on and beat another person for walking to the front of an auditorium?

Wow, you Trump supporters are tough.

Where is the evidence he was just walking to the front of the auditorium. Eyewitnesses say he was violently pushing people to the ground. I thought you wanted to keep to what we know or are you realising what we know doesn't fit your narrative now? It's a pain when those facts just won't fall for you, eh?