It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: Kryties
I thought the majority of ATS would see both choices are terrible. It has amazed me how many people have fallen for trump the plant.
Mind you If he does get in we will have many months of mirth laughing at the USA I still suspect a civil war either way.
I just hope many USAers don't move to Canada driving land prices up.
That's my plan.
Oh and UKTruth is the only Brit who takes Trump seriously. He is a figure of fun over here.
originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: Kryties
AUS was my first choice but drop bears dude...DROP BEARS I don't know how you cope.
The Guardian found a bruised and shocked-looking Crites outside the auditorium. He said he was shaken and had pain in the back, but was otherwise uninjured.
Crites, who said he was an inventor who works with high-altitude balloons, said the incident occurred after he walked toward the front of the stage to protest silently against Trump.
He confirmed witness descriptions of him moving through the crowd toward the front. However, he said he was not barging through but saying “Can I please come through, can I please come through”.
When he was near the front of the crowd, he said he silently held aloft his sign.
“I had a sign that said ‘Republicans against Trump’. It is a sign that you can just print off online.”
Initially, there was the expected reaction of people around him booing, he said. “And then all of a sudden people next to me are starting to get violent; they’re grabbing at my arm, trying to rip the sign out of my hand,” he said.
originally posted by: UKTruth
I see.
Whatever, it is really quite obvious that Clinton once again paid an agitator to incite violence.
originally posted by: tweetie
a reply to: Sublimecraft
I see this thread became controversial overnight and I'm way behind. I came across an account a moment ago of someone who states she was there, close to the man in question:
Twitter comment
originally posted by: Kryties
originally posted by: UKTruth
I see.
Whatever, it is really quite obvious that Clinton once again paid an agitator to incite violence.
He didn't incite anything. The Trump supporters incited it by beating him, kicking him, holding him in a chokehold and deliberately yelling "GUN" knowing it was only a sign. All he did was uphold his Constitutionally-protected right to hold up a friggin sign. It's not his fault the Trump rally beat the living bejesus out of him for it.
originally posted by: Kryties
originally posted by: UKTruth
Well, the only official paid internet trolls are engaged by and paid by Clinton.
I don't know if any are here.
Evidence? Oh, you don't have any? What a shock.
originally posted by: Kryties
originally posted by: UKTruth
Eye witness reports say otherwise.
The same eyewitnesses who yelled out "GUN" when it was clearly a sign?
Looks like he was acting crazy, pushing & shoving pple, kids and elderly included. He's an instigator, not peaceful protestor.
originally posted by: UKTruth
I see. So dismiss eye witnesses if they don't see what you would like them to see.
Hmmm.
He was behaving exactly as the paid agitators we know about from the Clinton campaign.