It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: smurfy
Burger it...the wall is all about jobs too...isn't it? Oh! I forgot, he wants Mexico to build it...
Actually I think he wants American workers to build it and Mexico pay for it. Hey, is that his plan to bring more jobs to the US?
originally posted by: TheBulk
I thought Trump did great and Hillary came off weak and robotic. It was obvious the entire time that Holt was Hillary's teammate. Like I said before the debate, Holt has a long and documented history of being a left wing/Democrat shill.
Don't believe anything the media says.
originally posted by: OrganizedChaos
a reply to: amazing
lol, where did I ever say they were different? Though they are, we ALL are.
I was using logic in saying it will be either Trump or Hillary. It's too late for other parties to get elected. Their 1000 votes at election time means absolutely NOTHING. It isn't advancing other party anything.
There isn't a consolation prize just for getting a few votes.
You have to take the best you can get and start NOW working towards the NEXT election.
The beauty of America is you can vote anyway you want or not, if you want.
The fact of the matter is, not all decisions are black vs white, you have to take good with bad because no one is perfect. Some decisions in life really are Bad1 or Bad2. And yes, at this point in the game voting outside party for President now is only good for YOU because it does nothing to improve or change our situation. Why are we presented with this dilemma? Because we allowed it.
If you really want other options you need to get out on Nov 9 and START campaigning and helping the other parties to gain some ground for the NEXT elections.
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
Dozens of online polls show that Mr Trump crushed Hillary at the debates.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Bloodydagger
Never heard of a 'bot to screw online polls?
LOL.
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
a reply to: Bloodydagger
Erm, did you watch the debate?
And - oh look online polls! Did you know that anyone can vote in those? Multiple times? There's even online polls that claim that a majority of people think that the Loch Ness Monster exists.
Anyhoo - he lost. Deal with it.
originally posted by: imjack
a reply to: Bloodydagger
You are seriously missing something if you think these systems aren't easily hacked.
There is no news coverage, because there is NOTHING there HIDDEN to FIND. It's EASILY hacked, as in, there would be NO PROOF, because it's part of it's default-faulty code.
It WOULD NOT be News, as these Company's hold these Polls as little more than WATERCOOLER conversation. They do not care if it's accurate, they are not an election committee, and none of them seriously would even consider their polls being compromised meaning ANYTHING. They do it for publicity and traffic alone.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: DBCowboy
My bet is there isn't anything should could say that would sway you, you have been pretty adamant about your feelings, which I am not saying you shouldn't have, towards Hillary.