Does Trump advocate Clinton assassination?

a reply to: windword

I believe that they were caught off guard and too surprised to act on the suggestion, in the moment.

I'll give your interpretation of other people's feelings the benefit of the doubt.

a reply to: mOjOm

Well, maybe that's because the majority of what Trump says is irrelevant slogans and meaningless jibber jabber. That doesn't mean the small amount left over isn't significant. Nor is it something where you compare what's being said by the amount of words used.

If I give you an hour long speech filled with useless information but within that speech make the small statement that I'll be stealing all your money in the bank, that one single statement is still extremely important is it not?? It may have only taken seconds out of an hour long speech to say but is still the most critical statement being made. Just because it represents only a fraction of the entire speech is irrelevant.

It's not critical is the point. In fact, it was the least critical statement of the entire speech, but you might know that if you had watched to it. He's done more rallies and speeches since, and as you spend time scrutinizing this one innocuous phrase, the rest of what you haven't listened to or considered grows.

In other words, your time wasted is irrelevant, and the defence of wasting time is meaningless jibber jabber.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: TheFlyOnTheWall

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: TheFlyOnTheWall

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: TheFlyOnTheWall

Using Hillary to justify Trump.

Doesn't work.

She used the word assassination.Trump didn't. Where's the media frenzy?

This is about Trump. Not Hillary.

This is about the blatant hypocrisy in media.

NO, its not.

Yes it is. Read up on the council on foreign relations. They control all the media, politicians and the globalism ideology in N. America. Here's my take. Trump is a stooge and Hillary will win. Hillary is the establishment and if you don't think there is hypocrisy in the media I don't know what to tell you. Maybe start researching back to 1917 and use the names Jacob Schiff and Paul Warburg. There's so much you don't seem to know about the media.

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

I said NOTHING about feelings. I was talking about the reactions that appeared on the people's faces, who were seated around Trump when he said:
If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks,” Trump said, adding, “Although the Second Amendment people — maybe there is, I don’t know.”

Their shocked reactions were plain to see.

a reply to: windword

I said NOTHING about feelings. I was talking about the reactions that appeared on the people's faces, who were seated around Trump when he said:
If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks,” Trump said, adding, “Although the Second Amendment people — maybe there is, I don’t know.”

Their shocked reactions were plain to see.

The one guy who looked at his wife and laughed?

originally posted by: Annee
For sure.

This one simply can not be spun.

It already was spun from the get-go...well, maybe just misinterpreted, if I want to give the benefit of the doubt (which is being very generous). Of course, just because you believe him to have meant one thing from the comment doesn't make you correct (nor does what I got out of the comment make me correct), but if you are unwilling to admit that it's possible that your interpretation of the comment could be wrong, then what good is discussing this issue?

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Laughing was his wife's first reaction, it wasn't his.

a reply to: windword

I will grant you that one guy, but one guy does not a crowd make.

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

You're the one who mentioned "one" guy. There was a whole crowd of reactions. That's a fact!

a reply to: windword

You're the one who mentioned "one" guy. There was a whole crowd of reactions. That's a fact!

None of whom expressed shock.

Their shocked reactions were plain to see.

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

You think you know so much, well you're wrong genius. I read the entire transcript of his speech. I read every single word of it. So I know all of what he said in his speech. I also listen to his speeches in full as well. So don't tell me what I've watched or haven't watched or read or heard.

Just because you don't find it of any significance doesn't mean that others don't. Since you insist on also taking into consideration all his other speeches he gives let's take them into consideration as well if it makes you happy. Along with this latest call for the 2nd Amendment folks to take matters in to their own hands to stop Clinton from appointing Judges to the supreme court, he's also repeatedly suggested that she's covertly murdering people, secretly and knowingly bringing in ISIS to the US to kill us, that she needs to be locked up, etc.

Whether you agree with him or not isn't the point either. When you take this last statement with his repeated attacks and suggestions of what needs to be done with her it paints a pretty good picture. Even more clear when taking all his speeches in to consideration as you suggested. In fact, just this one statement alone would be easier to dismiss had it not been for so many others in the past.

So stop acting like you're the only one paying attention to anything. You can keep making excuses, but if you'll notice that too seems to be a trend as well. You making excuses.

a reply to: mOjOm

I will act how I please, not how you wish I would.

Claiming to know what I think while at the same time claiming to know what Trump is implying is evidence of psychic abilities, or guesswork. That's all you have.

If stringing together disparate phrases from disparate times helps you to paint a picture, then my friend, I wager you're a poor artist.

i don't need to make excuses for Trump, as he's clearly clarified his remarks on everything countless times. What is without excuse is the unscrupulous dependency of thread-bare arguments put forward by a gutter press, that you have obviously and continually traded for your own.

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

None of whom expressed shock.

You're either a flat out liar or you're blind!







There were several people whose reaction was laughter, too, as many people do react to uncomfortable situations with laughter.

It appears his comments alone were enough for the Secret Service to take notice.

A US Secret Service official confirms to CNN that the USSS has spoken to the Trump campaign regarding his Second Amendment comments. "There has been more than one conversation" on the topic, the official told CNN.

www.cnn.com...

a reply to: matafuchs

And everyone knows that changing the constitution takes tremendous support throughout the legislature, the executive and judicial branches of government and it takes bipartisan cooperation. Years of congressional hearings, votes and vitos and more votes. Then Supreme Court hearings and delays and clarifications and caucuses and all that entails.
Hillary is not looking to change the constitution.

Just think about it.

originally posted by: introvert
It appears his comments alone were enough for the Secret Service to take notice.

A US Secret Service official confirms to CNN that the USSS has spoken to the Trump campaign regarding his Second Amendment comments. "There has been more than one conversation" on the topic, the official told CNN.

www.cnn.com...

And they had two conversations about it.
Serious.

a reply to: windword

Out of the 7 people in your photos, 3 people could be argued (by your expert analysis) to be in shock. Your "crowd" is getting smaller by the second.

a reply to: sirlancelot

Yeah see that's not the government's problem. That's you guys who will STILL. BE ABLE TO BUY GUNS problem having to fork over more cash. Oh so sad...

But you'll have your guns. Not assault rifles. But your rifles and your ammo and your right to shoot.

So it's false that she's taking away your guns.

Maybe you can get a job with trump so you can afford them when the price goes up.

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Laughter is also a response to shock, and uncomfortable situations. The reactions across the board are palpable. We can hear the roars from the crowd when he says:

To say otherwise is intellectual dishonesty, which polite for "liars gonna lie".

a reply to: amicktd

Isn't it pathetic that we take him out of context

Two or three times a week?