Does Trump advocate Clinton assassination?

a reply to: mOjOm

I see. So again, it's all the media and couldn't possibly be anything Trump is saying which is promoting violence all on it's own huh???

You would have a point if any violence has occurred against the other candidates and her supporters. It appears a guy punched someone else, but that's about it. It takes a real stretch of the imagination to pretend Trump is inciting violence against himself and his own supporters.

a reply to: Logarock

You are so far off topic.



And yeah Trump made a veiled attempt at reminding all the psychopaths that they have guns and know how to use them. Dude is fcked up.

originally posted by: mOjOm

originally posted by: Logarock

Well do you remember when HRC made the comment about not dropping out of the Democratic nomination process a few years back because Obama may be assassinated?

No, I don't remember anything about that.

I believe you, I just don't recall anything about that.

What's your point???

The point being that the comment could have aroused some Hillary nut to go after Obama. It was a good deal more clear in her case as well. But no one said anything to her highness about it.

originally posted by: BrokedownChevy
a reply to: Logarock

You are so far off topic.



And yeah Trump made a veiled attempt at reminding all the psychopaths that they have guns and know how to use them. Dude is fcked up.

OMG. Its a bit deeper than that. For me anyway. When I hear Trump talk like that its simply a reminder that the LIBERALS are going to drive this country into a civil war. Point-if the court is stacked and they start to bury the 2nd amendment in bull crap since they cant really legally dismantle a constitutional amendment, it puts many on the spot who will be forced to disobey.

You can call millions of american all a bunch of nut jobs but at least Don has enough brains to respect real political power.

a reply to: Logarock

If what you say is true then they should say something about it.

But it makes no difference unless you're saying two wrongs make a right.

a reply to: Logarock

We got crazy people screaming to lay off their guns, and we say "we don't want your guns" and they scream "stay back" and then they post slow-mo looping youtube videos as conclusive evidence of seizures, and these same sane people call Hillary "the devil"... and then they scream that the liberals are going to start a civil war...

No... it's that batsh*t attitude that's waiting to explode, and it's why so many people are concerned about Trump and his hateful divisive rhetoric and beacon for batsh*t crazy people.

Just saying... the whole world agrees... a whole lotta batsh*t coming out of the Trump campaign. Maybe the whole world isn't wrong to be concerned.

originally posted by: BlueAjah
This is just another example of people twisting things and putting words in Trump's mouth. They will use any excuse to slander him.

He did not in any way encourage violence.

He said that "second amendment people" could do something about it. In other words, don't vote for Hillary.

Sheesh. I think the special snowflakes out there are more abundant than I ever realized.

then why not refer to first amendment people?....the right to petition the government for redress of grievances is in the first.

a reply to: spiritualzombie


Yea I know.......and its the War of The Worlds to the liberals. They hold each other at night and wonder aloud if the "gun crazies" from Mars will ever break out of their mental cages and go fruit loop all over heels half acre! And that constitution we have......what were those people thinking when they made personal weapons part of the political philosophy of a nation. Must have been inbreed of the mountain people, of brother and sister, a twisted thing, a strange people that allow weapons as part of the politic discourse.

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: BlueAjah
This is just another example of people twisting things and putting words in Trump's mouth. They will use any excuse to slander him.

He did not in any way encourage violence.

He said that "second amendment people" could do something about it. In other words, don't vote for Hillary.

Sheesh. I think the special snowflakes out there are more abundant than I ever realized.

then why not refer to first amendment people?....the right to petition the government for redress of grievances is in the first.

Whats the difference as the 2nd demonstrates a point of redress. What you wanted some 2nd amendment lite before the boilermaker Jimmy?

a reply to: Logarock


I rest my case.

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: BlueAjah
This is just another example of people twisting things and putting words in Trump's mouth. They will use any excuse to slander him.

He did not in any way encourage violence.

He said that "second amendment people" could do something about it. In other words, don't vote for Hillary.

Sheesh. I think the special snowflakes out there are more abundant than I ever realized.

then why not refer to first amendment people?....the right to petition the government for redress of grievances is in the first.

By the way for all you easy bite cereal box constitutionalist.......did you ever wonder what they were talking about when they said redress the government through petition? I mean we already have representatives right? A petition would be something the people did outside of the representative channels and would in fact probably be aimed at them. At any rate it does mean being able to speak a sentence with the 2nd amendment mentioned without getting a visit from the SS.

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Logarock

If what you say is true then they should say something about it.

But it makes no difference unless you're saying two wrongs make a right.

I am saying that its Trump week, Get Trump, Trump Buster.

HRC could drop a load on stage in public and they would call it a masterpiece of modern political dialog.

originally posted by: Logarock
HRC could drop a load on stage in public and they would call it a masterpiece of modern political dialog.

Based on what observation would you claim Hillary could pull off stage defecation?

Think about it... This thread and the "Trump Baby Kick" thread, and the "Mexicans are rapists" statement, and "take out their families" thing, and the "do a lot worse than waterboarding" and "Ted Cruz's dad killed JFK"... I think if anyone can pull off stage defecation with an unflinching audience-- it's Trump.

a reply to: Logarock

Really??? Because I see Clinton being attacked all the time. From her criminal past and her email leaks which are totally justified in attacking her about to the fact that she wears pant suits and she's menopausal which seem like lame reasons to try and attack someone.

Then they attack her because her husband cheated on her and attack her morality about that. They attack her because of her age, because she's a woman, because of her voice, because she's pandering, etc.

So I don't know what world you're living in but there isn't one political figure that I know of that isn't being attacked almost daily for something.

originally posted by: Logarock

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: BlueAjah
This is just another example of people twisting things and putting words in Trump's mouth. They will use any excuse to slander him.

He did not in any way encourage violence.

He said that "second amendment people" could do something about it. In other words, don't vote for Hillary.

Sheesh. I think the special snowflakes out there are more abundant than I ever realized.

then why not refer to first amendment people?....the right to petition the government for redress of grievances is in the first.

Whats the difference as the 2nd demonstrates a point of redress. What you wanted some 2nd amendment lite before the boilermaker Jimmy?

What are you talking about?

The 2nd Amendment:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

What point of redress?

originally posted by: spiritualzombie

Think about it... This thread and the "Trump Baby Kick" thread, and the "Mexicans are rapists" statement, and "take out their families" thing, and the "do a lot worse than waterboarding" and "Ted Cruz's dad killed JFK"... I think if anyone can pull off stage defecation with an unflinching audience-- it's Trump.

Oh hell ya he could pull that off.

Now if he ate and then shat out a baby on stage and then kicked it into his crowd of supporters, then, MAYBE, Just Maybe his supporters might not like it. Some of them would of course love it and claim the baby should be proud to be passed the the colon of such a fine man and then shared as the waste to the crowd like that. But there might be a couple of his supporters that would break free of his spell upon seeing that and decide that eating babies, passing them and then covering the crowd in it might be a step too far. In theory anyway. It's still a pretty close call IMO.

a reply to: Logarock

Sorry. Not buying it. He's a moron. Trump was a liberal last week and now you're barking about liberals while supporting Trump? Sounds like a solid plan over there.

And yeah, I'm sitting in the airport right and I'm hearing a lot of nut jobs carrying on. Doesn't matter which side you're on, people are emotionally driven weirdos. The only thing that keeps me from joining the crazy train is the fact that I have been repeatedly selected for some of the best jobs in my field. A constant reminder that I'm on a good path while everyone else keeps being nutty.

Back to your candidate telling you to shoot someone. Why do you think you're so murderous and callous about human life?

Edit: brains and respect are two different things. Trump treats you like you're stupid which shows he has no respect for our people and he doesn't understand very simple things like why nuclear weapons should not be used. So there goes the brains thing you were talking about. I guess when your standard for intelligence is that low a nitwit like Trump comes off like a genius. To the rest of us, he's awful and embarrassing.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert

Hey Introvert thats ok nbc evening news is spouting the same "he may have meant" crap that you are.
At least you and the msm are on the same page right?

His sentence structure was not very clear. It is very hard to tell what he meant.

It is not clear that he was referring to the SCOTUS nominees and it is not clear if he was referring to it being a "horrible day" when discussing what the 2nd amendment supporters could do.

Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that Trump was not clear in his message and we can chalk this up to another instance where Trump says something stupid without a precise point.

Walking it back from "I think he may have been referring to violence against Hillary."? Could have saved yourself some trouble if you'd just applied this kind of reasoning sooner.

Maybe he was saying something stupid, or implying that people should vote, or even a revolt as is our right and duty should the government start infringing on rights. Whatever it is it's clear he wasn't calling for anyone to assassinate her.

Trump Supporters: "we like Trump because he says it like it is!"

Next day

Trump Supporters: "wait! He didn't really meant what he said!"