It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RepealTheLaw
originally posted by: muse7
Something that Muslims and Christian Conservatives can both agree on.
Difference being, you let the Muslims take over and the Liberals are doing just that, you will see much more than just opposition to the lifestyle. With conservatives, you have progress in the face of enormous pressure. Muslims will just round up the homosexuals and behead them all. They wont bend to political pressure, they will just extinguish it.
Liberal LGBT snowflakes will rue the day they decided to leave the Muslims out of their fight for equal rights..
originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: 3danimator2014
You have picked me up wrong I get on well with my muslim neighbours & work colleagues I go to lunch with a couple of them. QUALIFY.
Look at the Glasgow shopkeeper murder the other week a muslim killed by another muslim because he wished his christian customers a happy Easter that's how warped many are. WAS HE LYNCHED BY HIS COMMUNITY THEN?
The female member of my family repeatedly verbally abused on her way to work over a period of 18+ months. IF YOU SAY SO.
I have heard of areas of one major city that if a white person walks through with a carrier bag of alcohol they are threatened because the local muslims say they control the area. WHICH AREA PLEASE, HAS THIS HAPPENED TO YOU? HOW DID YOU HEAR THIS?
That's only a few of many examples I know. PLEASE ELABORATE ON THE MANY EXAMPLES YOU KNOW AND HOW YOU COME TO KNOW THEM.
ICM conducted a random location, quota-based sampling approach, with locations selected from all of those where the Muslim population accounts for at least 20% of the total population. This ensures that one in five will be eligible.
Why did we choose the 20% minimum threshold? A full scale random location methodology which includes areas with very few Muslims living in them would have been practically impossible given reasonable cost restraints. Slightly more than 50 % of British Muslims live in the areas we surveyed, and we believe that the 20% threshold was a compromise that was superior to others that could have been taken, as indeed they have to be on every survey that is ever conducted.
originally posted by: 83Liberty
For all those asking how the sample had been conducted, it is here.
ICM conducted a random location, quota-based sampling approach, with locations selected from all of those where the Muslim population accounts for at least 20% of the total population. This ensures that one in five will be eligible.
Why did we choose the 20% minimum threshold? A full scale random location methodology which includes areas with very few Muslims living in them would have been practically impossible given reasonable cost restraints. Slightly more than 50 % of British Muslims live in the areas we surveyed, and we believe that the 20% threshold was a compromise that was superior to others that could have been taken, as indeed they have to be on every survey that is ever conducted.
originally posted by: 83Liberty
originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: 83Liberty
By golly, you're right. That asshole member should shut up
Eh? I don't get it.
He should shut up because he provided a link to the actual survey that this whole thread is based on?
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: 83Liberty
For all those asking how the sample had been conducted, it is here.
ICM conducted a random location, quota-based sampling approach, with locations selected from all of those where the Muslim population accounts for at least 20% of the total population. This ensures that one in five will be eligible.
Why did we choose the 20% minimum threshold? A full scale random location methodology which includes areas with very few Muslims living in them would have been practically impossible given reasonable cost restraints. Slightly more than 50 % of British Muslims live in the areas we surveyed, and we believe that the 20% threshold was a compromise that was superior to others that could have been taken, as indeed they have to be on every survey that is ever conducted.
Thanks for this - useful information.
The concentration of those surveyed to highly populated Muslim areas does, in my view, skew the results.
All Muslims that live in areas of low Muslim populations have been excluded from the survey - some 1.4m of them.
I would expect Muslim populations of less than 20% of the overall population to be better integrated into the UK and therefore hold more moderate views on questions relating to sexuality.
I think, therefore, that what the survey is actually saying is that '50% of Muslims that live in areas with a high population mix of fellow Muslims believe that homosexuality should be banned'.
But this isn't propaganda.
originally posted by: 83Liberty
This is also reported in other MSM, not just Sky...
www.theguardian.com...
www.telegraph.co.uk...
www.bbc.co.uk...
www.independent.co.uk...
This survey, entitled 'What British Muslims Really Think' will be aired tonight on Channel 4.
originally posted by: 83Liberty
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: 83Liberty
For all those asking how the sample had been conducted, it is here.
ICM conducted a random location, quota-based sampling approach, with locations selected from all of those where the Muslim population accounts for at least 20% of the total population. This ensures that one in five will be eligible.
Why did we choose the 20% minimum threshold? A full scale random location methodology which includes areas with very few Muslims living in them would have been practically impossible given reasonable cost restraints. Slightly more than 50 % of British Muslims live in the areas we surveyed, and we believe that the 20% threshold was a compromise that was superior to others that could have been taken, as indeed they have to be on every survey that is ever conducted.
Thanks for this - useful information.
The concentration of those surveyed to highly populated Muslim areas does, in my view, skew the results.
All Muslims that live in areas of low Muslim populations have been excluded from the survey - some 1.4m of them.
I would expect Muslim populations of less than 20% of the overall population to be better integrated into the UK and therefore hold more moderate views on questions relating to sexuality.
I think, therefore, that what the survey is actually saying is that '50% of Muslims that live in areas with a high population mix of fellow Muslims believe that homosexuality should be banned'.
You are absolutely correct.
Another point is that on page 6 of the survey, it shows 64% of Muslims born in the UK think Homosexuality should be legal, while only 36% of Muslims who where not born in the UK think it should be legal.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: auraofblack
Then let them go live in a backward thinking Muslim nation that entertains the arcane notion.
End of the day if they dont like the laws of the land they are perfectly free to depart our shores.