It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: TaleDawn
Sure, the late 40's and 50's were "great"...
If you were a white male.
originally posted by: introvert
I wonder if Trump would admit that we could not have won that war if it weren't for the cooperation with Communist Russia.
The D-Day invasion would have ended differently if the Eastern Front wasn't a focus for Germany.
originally posted by: Arizonaguy
originally posted by: introvert
I wonder if Trump would admit that we could not have won that war if it weren't for the cooperation with Communist Russia.
The D-Day invasion would have ended differently if the Eastern Front wasn't a focus for Germany.
I wonder if Soviet Russia would admit that if it wasn't for the lend lease program and the continued war on the western front that they probably would have been overrun by Hitler and company? See how this works?
originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
a reply to: Lucid Lunacy
The majority of women were much happier back then being fulltime mothers before feminists denigrated women for being fulltime mothers.
originally posted by: Snarl
originally posted by: crazyewok
That again just shows me it was a ALLIED win not a US only win.
I forget. Which side was English leadership on back then?
originally posted by: woodwardjnr
Maybe a Marshall plan for the Middle East would be a good idea? Can't see Americans going for that
originally posted by: digital01anarchy
a reply to: TaleDawn
please do tell why he's wrong
originally posted by: Snarl
originally posted by: crazyewok
That again just shows me it was a ALLIED win not a US only win.
I forget. Which side was English leadership on back then?
originally posted by: Willtell
America was economically growing immensely after WWII because we protected trade and jobs and taxed the rich appropriately and created massive infrastructure with those taxes that created jobs and grew the economy.
originally posted by: Willtell
Trump is actually right here in some regard
America was economically growing immensely after WWII because we protected trade and jobs and taxed the rich appropriately and created massive infrastructure with those taxes that created jobs and grew the economy.
The problem is he doesn’t say the first step in our downfall:
That is when Ronald Reagan cut taxes for the rich in 1981
He does admit that Reagan messed up by starting the trade deals but he won't admit that the huge tax cuts for the rich were also destructive to the macro economy as were the trade deals
originally posted by: Astyanax
You Trumpsters really do need to have it all spelled out for you, eh?
1946 onwards: women in the workforce, quite mystifyingly, don’t want to go back to scraping excrement off diapers. They're also quite keen to be making their own money and not having to ask the Hubster (a kind of Trumpster-at-home) for a few bucks whenever they want to have their hair done. So they stay in work, and guess what, it’s great for economic growth and for women too. In fact, even more of them enter the workforces, so that the proportion of women in the workforce increases every decade from 1940 to 2000.