It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
3. The Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA)
The mainstream media have had much to say about the Islamist brutality of Boko Haram, but one terrorist group they haven’t paid nearly as much attention to is the Lord’s Resistance Army—which was founded by Joseph Kony (a radical Christianist) in Uganda in 1987 and has called for the establishment of a severe Christian fundamentalist government in that country. The LRA, according to Human Rights Watch, has committed thousands of killings and kidnappings—and along the way, its terrorism spread from Uganda to parts of the Congo, the Central African Republic (CAR) and South Sudan. The word “jihadist” is seldom used in connection with the LRA, but in fact, the LRA’s tactics are not unlike those of ISIS or Boko Haram. And the governments Kony hopes to establish in Sub-Saharan Africa would implement a Christianist equivalent of Islamic Sharia law.
4. TheNational Liberation Front of Tripura
India is not only a country of Hindus and Sikhs, but also, of Muslims, Buddhists, Catholics and Protestants. Most of India’s Christians are peaceful, but a major exception is the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT). Active in the state of Tripura in Northeastern India since 1989, NLFT is a paramilitary Christianist movement that hopes to secede from India and establish a Christian fundamentalist government in Tripura. NLFT has zero tolerance for any religion other than Christianity, and the group has repeatedly shown a willingness to kill, kidnap or torture Hindus who refuse to be converted to its extreme brand of Protestant fundamentalism.
In 2000, NLFT vowed to kill anyone who participated in Durga Puja (an annual Hindu festival) And in May 2003, at least 30 Hindus were murdered during one of NLFT’s killing sprees.
periodically is a correctly used in this context, grab a dictionary if you like. Because you don't understand does not make it rhetoric. Anyway goodbye.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: DrakeINFERNO
800 years an AWFUL big jump to be using the adjective "periodically". Islam was created in the 600's AD. So according to YOUR logic, from the 600's to around 1300 (700 years) they were destroying the west, then for another 800 years they weren't doing anything. Now they are attacking again (but are mostly being contained in the Middle East), yet somehow this can be described as "periodically".
Like I said your rhetoric makes zero sense.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Xtrozero
You don't say?
originally posted by: DrakeINFERNO
periodically is a correctly used in this context, grab a dictionary if you like. Because you don't understand does not make it rhetoric. Anyway goodbye.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: DrakeINFERNO
800 years an AWFUL big jump to be using the adjective "periodically". Islam was created in the 600's AD. So according to YOUR logic, from the 600's to around 1300 (700 years) they were destroying the west, then for another 800 years they weren't doing anything. Now they are attacking again (but are mostly being contained in the Middle East), yet somehow this can be described as "periodically".
Like I said your rhetoric makes zero sense.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Xtrozero
You don't say?
Ya there are a lot of screwed up areas in the world. Are the LRA or NFLT world threats? Are they numbered in the millions? I'm trying to understand your point here when yes we can have something like Branch Dravidian but are they really an issue. What is going on in the Middle East is a world issue. I care little about religion and I care little about terrorist groups all around the world. What I do care about are the ones that are the worst and largest, and who see the whole world as their war zone. Unfortunately this is all coming out of the middle east.
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
And I've already noted many times here on ATS that Muslims are fighting them. Iraq's army & militias are mostly Muslims and they're fighting them. Iran's mostly Muslims & they're fighting them. Syria's army and government are mostly Muslims and they're fighting them. Hezbollah are mostly Muslims and they're fighting them. The Kurdish people are roughly 90% Sunni Muslims and their militias are fighting them. Egypt is doing military operations against them in Libya right now.
originally posted by: DrakeINFERNO
a reply to: Krazysh0tlol you can alter the definition of periodically all you want. It means from time to time. Id say you have an extremely high opinion of your intelligence. You are the one getting hung up on your definition of periodically.
originally posted by: WeRpeons
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Some of these "Cristian organizations" are just that "Organizations" who are most likely not all made up of Christians and there violence is not justified by their religious doctrine like Islam. A lot of these are not even based in the United States, so of course I wasn't aware of those. I would also question if their violence is directed straight from biblical scriptures or is it created by the groups personal ideology. There's a big difference!
The KKK and Aryan Nation do not take their racial views directly from Bible Scriptures of follow the documented life of Jesus. Jesus did not promote the white race as being superior. If anything, the bible states the Jews were his chosen people. So if the KKK or Aryan nation really wanted to skew the Christian religion, they would actually be a Jewish organization! My main point is, Mohammed's life is documented to be criminal, and these "Radical Islamists" are following the true life and teachings of Mohammed.
Don't get me wrong, I don't justify any organization that promotes violence. Unfortunately the 1st Amendment of our constitution grants for freedom of assembly, which doesn't distinguish between violent and non-violent organizations. I'm all for freedom to assemble, but when it comes to gangs or organizations who are known to engage in violence and/or drug trafficking, they should be declared illegal.
In fact I would be for amending the freedom to assemble based on a criminal violence clause. Humanity doesn't need protect an organization the promotes violence and criminal activities.
originally posted by: Revolution9
a reply to: Kapusta
How can anyone who reads this be sure? Words come easy and words are cheap.
How do you feel about women? Is a woman equal to a man? Should she have the same legal rights?
How do you feel about gay and transgender people? Is it ok for them to practise that and you promise you will tolerate them?
Regarding Law and punishment: Are you happy to live in a land who's laws are different to yours, who are more lenient and do not practise capital punishment and amputation of limbs? Can you promise not to interfere with that and that you will not slowly try to make our laws fit with your religion?
Do you mind me being a believer in Christ and that I do not think your prophet is a prophet. I do not mind that you think he is a prophet, but I do not. Are you ok with that? Can you promise not to take violent action out on me now or in the future?
I will not inundate you with any other questions, but these are my biggest concerns about you. If you can answer that you will not hurt me regarding all the above then welcome. You can come live next door!
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
ISIS isn't really a world threat either. Every now and then there is an attack in the west like the one in Paris, but for the most part their shenanigans remain within Iraq and Syria.