Muslim Invasion of Europe

a reply to: FormOfTheLord

I saw that too. It doesn't exactly give you the warm fuzzies, does it.

a reply to: anxiouswens

Can you please link to the official EU figures as they're in direct contrast to the UN figures here (not doubting you, just suprised the two would show such contrast): data.unhcr.org...

a reply to: Bluesma

So, have the French never heard the word 'deportation'? I guess the problem is not knowing where to send them.
I see Germany is looking into how Canada does things. They deport around 10,000 people a year, for not adhering to the vows they took when they entered. Right up at the top is "learn the language" and "adhere to our laws".

Well what can I say! Instead people would rather dissect a piece of writing rather than opening their eyes and seeing what is front of them! Time will tell! I hope I'm really wrong. I would love to be proved wrong, I really would, there is no one would be happier than me!a reply to: FormOfTheLord

I'm actually surprised no one has come forward yet to tell you they probably aren't really and that they have been photoshopped!a reply to: FormOfTheLord

originally posted by: anxiouswens
So why are Germany, Sweden etc their first places of choice if they want to go to English speaking Countries? That doesn't make sense?a reply to: Drinking

Read below why:

According to an investigation by Swedish newspaper Dala-Demokraten, Arab migrants are being promised ‘free blonde Swedish girls’ and taxpayer-funded luxury treatment if they pay people smugglers to help them reach Scandinavia.
The report explains how most of the migrants seeking to cross into Europe who are being targeted by people smugglers are not even from Syria and cannot be considered refugees at all given that they reside in neighboring countries not at war.

Websites set up by people smugglers assert that migrants can get asylum quickly in Sweden and that they will be housed in luxury hotels until the government finds free accommodation for them, all at taxpayer expense.

“There is also sexual content in the advertisements, according to Dala-Demokraten,” reports Speisa, which translated the Dala-Demokraten article. “Among other things, the Arabs are promised their own free young willing blond Swedish girlfriend if they manage to illegally get all the way to the promised land in northern Europe.”

“In reality one can say that the young Syrian men are lured to Sweden by the oldest trick in the book – money and girls. Pictures of blonde beauties are published, and that Swedish women require real men,” writes Dala-Demokraten.

Apparently, migrants with no plan on working who travel to Sweden to live on government hand-outs are now considered “real men”.

Based on the fact that Sweden has experienced a 1400% increase in rapes since it swung its doors open to mass immigration, with the majority of the culprits identified as “foreigners,” one suspects that not all of the migrants’ encounters with ‘free Swedish blonde girls’ will be consensual.

The fact that the websites directly target men again illustrates how the media portrayal of migrants as desperate refugee families fleeing war and ISIS persecution is largely bogus.

According to the UN’s own figures, 72% of the migrants fleeing to Europe are men, with just 13% women and 15% children.

As we reported earlier, a prominent recently gave a speech at a mosque in Jerusalem in which he asserted that Muslims should use the migrant crisis to breed with European citizens and “conquer their countries”.

www.gatestoneinstitute.org...

originally posted by: bastion


I'm a mathematician, I follow what stats and studies show - which is that the vast majority who claim legal residency are far less likely to receive or claim welfare. i.huffpost.com...

The article makes the unfounded claims and assumptions that the vast majority will just sponge and self-segregate; which is the polar opposite of what scientific studies of the last 15 years have shown.

What country is that for?

And what do the designations A10, EEA stand for?

Because this study contradicts that.

originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: Bluesma

So, have the French never heard the word 'deportation'? I guess the problem is not knowing where to send them.
I see Germany is looking into how Canada does things. They deport around 10,000 people a year, for not adhering to the vows they took when they entered. Right up at the top is "learn the language" and "adhere to our laws".

Sarkozy wanted to do that, but the cries of racism went up and snuffed it out.
The immigrants here are not asked to take any vows, and they don't need to speak the language.

Wasnt some of this supposedly predicted by Nostradamus ?

a reply to: Bluesma

Sarkozy wanted to do that, but the cries of racism went up and snuffed it out.
The immigrants here are not asked to take any vows, and they don't need to speak the language.

It's beginning to look like those policies might have to be reconsidered. Keep the refugees, get rid of the troublemakers.
I hope France gets a grip on this Bluesma. Perhaps if there are enough disgruntled citizens, they will step up to the plate and consider what's best for the country and it's citizens, and stop being so damn passive. At some point they may have to.

originally posted by: Bluesma

originally posted by: bastion


I'm a mathematician, I follow what stats and studies show - which is that the vast majority who claim legal residency are far less likely to receive or claim welfare. i.huffpost.com...

The article makes the unfounded claims and assumptions that the vast majority will just sponge and self-segregate; which is the polar opposite of what scientific studies of the last 15 years have shown.

What country is that for?

And what do the designations A10, EEA stand for?

Because this study contradicts that.

It's the UK - A10 means Asylum seeker, EEA stands for European Economic Area with EEA meaning economic migrants from within the EU and non-EEA meaning economic migrants from outside the EU.

Their not going to integrate into their host countries, their simply going to turn areas into little middle eastern countries of their origin, and as their populations grow, so will those areas. And those areas will become no go zones, You can end up being a tourist in Iraq without ever leaving your own country.

a reply to: ManFromEurope

Man from Europe, can you not see the future end game in all of this?
Sooner or later, you too will have to make a decision and quit hiding behind progressive bs, pc nonsense.

Today's modern world is very particular and intrinsic in its nuances.

There simply is no room in today's modern world for religious fanatics who's ideals are outdated and unproductive.

They will gladly destroy you if you refuse to assimilate.

Wake up and choose which side you are on.
Best to choose now then later on when you finally wake up and are unprepared.

originally posted by: ManFromEurope
a reply to: anxiouswens

What a mass of prejustice, ignorance and bulls*it!

- Why shouldn't the Syrians have money? Many had jobs, houses, were wealthy. They didn't live in a completely failed state, you know?

- The interviewed immigrant may have hopes for a higher standard and we are working very hard to house all refugees in winter-hardened houses with working heatings, isolations, etc. That takes time. Yes, a lot of my collegues (I am working in a different field) are working on housings for refugees.

- The comments under that liveleak-video are vile and stupid.

- That many young men are fleeing to not to have to fight in a useless war was discussed on this board many times before. They simply don't want to fight and lose their lives in a completely stupid war. The treck to Germany or Sweden is long and hazardous, and as soon as they are accepted refugees, their families can come in on much safer ways.

- The Gatestone Institute is a New York-based advocacy organization that is tied to neoconservative and other right-wing networks. (Source)

And so on and on. Fear and propaganda, thank you for this very useless thread.

You sir, live in a fantasy world.

originally posted by: masqua
Never punch a window out of anger, put your tongue on a frozen pipe or stick your hand in a flame.

All these things have consequences.

When a populated area of the world gets constantly bombed into dust, where do you think people are going to go?

Where would YOU go?

Probably anywhere...except the countries I considered responsible for bombing my homeland.

Unless I wanted to hit them back...

a reply to: bastion

i posted this last month.....im surprised the percentage as dropped 7 points in only a month but i do know as soon as they posted the 72% figure it was all over the internet. I wouldnt be surprised if at this point they will start cooking the books to make it not appear as awkward as it really is......



...

originally posted by: masqua
a reply to: markosity1973

If you were living in Saudi Arabia, with wife and children, would you want to leave?

I know I would, because I fear what will happen should the Family Saud ever fall... and kingdoms do fall.

The storm which is raging throughout the ME will eventually come to SA's doorstep too. I can't fault refugees for not wanting to go there even if they could.

So your logic is, bring that storm to Europe so those kingdoms fall first??

Without developed countries to provide aid for and guide the people of the ME, that storm you refer to will consume them...and possibly the rest of the world.

What I have noticed on the whole on this subject is that the people on ATS who seem not able to see how dangerous this is (and this is a generalised view) seem mainly to be from Countries such as Canada. Maybe a reason for this is because as I have just seen on another post Canada have much stricter rules when it comes to taking in refugees/asylum seekers. Also what people from all non-EU Countries seem to forget is that a big pull factor in Europe and the UK is the welfare system. For instance in the UK we have a NHS so health care is free of charge. Obviously anyone going to America wouldn't be able to get health care like this. There are the numerous benefits immigrants are allowed to claim as well, even if they are illegal, as shown in my other post.

There is also something fundamentally wrong with our Laws. Just recently there has been the case of the Libyan cadets who came to the UK and were charged rape and are now seeking asylum in our Country and are being funded to bring a case against the Government, then people wonder why British people like myself are so angry.

www.rt.com... This is the case I am referring to above.a reply to: anxiouswens

i would also like to point out that history has ALWAYS been about conquest. There are the conquerors and the conquered. The victors and the subjugated. Naive people seem to think we have evolved beyond primal violence and tribalism. We havent. Only the methods and window dressing has changed.


Another thing. I like so called "mono culture". These dummies that say we need to get rid of it are anti human. Humans have ALWAYS congregated among similar humans and formed somewhat uniform communities. This is not bad. Mono culture is the reason why we travel to foreign countries where they do things DIFFERENTLY and are different.....because thats exciting, thats interesting.

If i go to Sweden its because i want to experience things that are uniquely and more importantly UNIFORMALLY Swedish. Thats because those things are what makes Sweden what it is. Once you start diluting a culture and even worse, making the people of that culture feel guilty for their identity you have SUBJUGATED them.....you have conquered them.


If i want diversity ill go to a DIFFERENT country to visit orrrrrrrr....even to live there! And when i go to that country to live there......guess what.....i will live the WAY those people live.......because why would i want to destroy or in any way dilute the very things which made me want to live there or attracted me to visit?

When people refuse to integrate they prove what they really are and what they are really about.