It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Char-Lee
a reply to: Annee
CITIZENLINK ---- nothing like God guilt.
Grabbed the first there are many many...I am sure you realize this.
originally posted by: SubTruth
OK I guess I did not make myself clear enough.......The gay movement does have leaders and this is a.......FACT. All I did was ask the question I wonder if they are for or against this.......
Why is this so hard to understand........It was a simple question. Should I phrase it another way or underline key words or something?
originally posted by: SubTruth
originally posted by: EKron
originally posted by: SubTruth
a reply to: Liquesence
These parents should be ashamed of themselves. I wonder if the gay community supports this? Putting adult concepts and expectations on a 3 year old is pathetic and shameful.
You speak as if the "gay community" has some common thought or special insight into supporting this. Why would they?
Heck, the last thing in the world I would want is for a kid to be encouraged to be transgender. It's not something I would wish on anyone and do tend to agree that up to a certain age, traditional roles and behavior are what should be encouraged by a very young child's parents. I would change my tune though if we were talking of a child between five and seven years of age and even then would not be all that comfortable with it without the parents consulting professionals experienced in this area.
Assume much......I asked a simple straight forward question.......I wonder if the gay community supports this?
How does this simple question imply they are for or against it? You make a point of saying why would they support this.......Lets hear what the gay leadership has to say about it first.......See the irony you are actually the one assuming not me........
I would have to meet the kid to believe they were aware enough to know about such things and whether or not it was appropriate to do anything.
Christian (the dad) says. "Then puberty, and dating, and the challenges will be like a very steep curve".
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Kali74
"Probably", "likely", "most likely", all of that is just guesswork. We don't KNOW any of that.
I know if my kid looked sad and said "I'm not supposed to be a boy" I would ask a hell of a lot more questions than "are you happy?" as I'm driving to the store for ponytail holders.
So now we have a person running around who tells everyone she is an Asian Chinese lesbian who was born a white male, but that's the chaos moral relativity and subjective truth bring us to, and the so-called experts just nod their heads.
originally posted by: Char-Lee
originally posted by: Kali74
The child isn't getting hormones or having any physical changes to her body. Obviously it was more than just curiosity and wanting to play with her sisters things. Children know very early what gender they are... 99% of the time it's just 'well duh I have a vagina and I'm a girl, even if I like to cut my hair short, wear boys clothes... I'm a girl'.
Then there's kids, even at three, clearly unhappy with their physical gender and behaviors manifest that go beyond wanting to wear the opposite sex clothing and play as the opposite sex. I see zero wrong with letting a three year old 'boy' identify as a girl.
I disagree completely, as having been a complete "tomboy" I turned into an extremely feminine woman after puberty. Many changes in the body and mind about that age.
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Shamrock6
My kids are over twice his/her age and barely know what they want for breakfast nine times out of ten.
A three year old has their gender all figured out?
Wow.
That's sort of what I was thinking. Ours went through a phase where he thought he was Iron Man for a while.
originally posted by: Nyiah
For a country full of bible-thumping Christians who like to espouse that we all have souls, everyone sure is pretty adamant that there's no such thing as a soul landing in the wrong shell (body) for a lifetime.
I don't get people like that. Either it's certainly possible god F's up & sends a soul down to the wrong flesh house, or it's part of someone's ol' teaching plan (another thing people like to blabber about) And yet,when it comes to someone being sure to their very core that their soul is at the wrong address, it's brushed off like "Pfft, god doesn't mess up, you did."