It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: SubTruth
...except, for the umpteenth time, the reports in VAERS are not verified.
Do you honestly take a source seriously that claims vaccines can turn you into The Incredible Hulk?
A simple yes/no will suffice.
Still no answers to my questions regarding your claims...
Look I get the point.....I really do and you are correct. Big picture even if 20% of these deaths were caused by allergic reactions........
Actually, some do. Mercola for example. But can you provides some examples of reports from doctors in the database which "blame a vaccine" for a death?
Doctors are not just going to blame a vaccine without good merit
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SubTruth
That means it is not a hard stat......Get it.
I do get it.
You made it up.
originally posted by: MonkeyFishFrog
a reply to: SubTruth
No, I mean the WHO and the Ebola vaccination.
originally posted by: SubTruth
originally posted by: MonkeyFishFrog
Once again, I give you the World Health Organization fact sheets on the Measles. Their only agenda is to prevent illness and/or death.
During 2000-2013, measles vaccination prevented an estimated 15.6 million deaths making measles vaccine one of the best buys in public health.
The who's only agenda is to prevent illness and death.......I disagree and can prove what I am saying. During the Ebola scare did they try the new vaccine over in Africa they waited until it reached a 1st world country.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SubTruth
If only doctors can reports deaths to this database my argument is sound.
Not unless the death can be attributed to the vaccine.
Can you provides some examples of reports from doctors in the database which "blame a vaccine" for a death?
originally posted by: MonkeyFishFrog
a reply to: SubTruth
One page back
originally posted by: SubTruth
originally posted by: MonkeyFishFrog
Once again, I give you the World Health Organization fact sheets on the Measles. Their only agenda is to prevent illness and/or death.
During 2000-2013, measles vaccination prevented an estimated 15.6 million deaths making measles vaccine one of the best buys in public health.
The who's only agenda is to prevent illness and death.......I disagree and can prove what I am saying. During the Ebola scare did they try the new vaccine over in Africa they waited until it reached a 1st world country.
Wasn't sure what you meant here.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SubTruth
If the WHO really cared about overall health and lives it would have been used much earlier
How many doses were available?
originally posted by: boymonkey74
Ever seen a train wreck happening online? I have reading the last few pages.
Oh and please let it be true a vaccine can turn me into the hulk....
I guess you aren't aware that various vaccines have been under development for a while. I guess you aren't aware that they are all, still, in experimental stages.
But from what I witnessed when cases started happening in the US low and behold we have a vaccine
Actually, it does. A handful of doses really wouldn't help the situation.
And the number of doses really does not matter.
No. And I don't see much logic.
Are US lives more valuable than African lives.......See the logic about dose amounts.
Fair enough. Similar to your guesses about the VAERS database?
Personally I think they had a bunch of them