It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: charlyv
The concept of the wheel seems so simple, as there could be earlier instances of it's invention than we know of.
After some earth disasters and drastic changes in population, the concept could be lost only to be resurrected again.
Additionally, we know that our early ancestors did great works of stone, which they had to haul from some distant locations. Perhaps these are the tracks of what ever they used to get those stones from quarry to site. They certainly did not carry them.
originally posted by: Q
Please good people, do not bicker.
These tracks are obviously from a Pirelli LT265/70R17 121S.
Your suspect is a 2013 Dodge Ram 2500 Quad Cab...SLT, I think, judging from the slight toe-in wear seen in this rock formation.
Find that truck, and you'll have your answers.
originally posted by: skalla
a reply to: Entreri06
I imagine that a burial of a lizard skeleton with opposable thumbs, associated with flint scatters, hammerstones showing typical wear patterns, and grave goods would do that.
I don't know of any of those though. And yet we have a great many caves that show hundreds of thousands of years of human activity along with such tell tale signs.
originally posted by: Baddogma
a reply to: Indigo5
Double irrigation ditches seem unnecessarily redundant... ever dig a ditch? One is usually enough...
originally posted by: skalla
a reply to: Entreri06
I know you are just shooting the breeze etc, but rationally that's just so unlikely as to be discounted until we have some evidence.
And of course, we have found bones that old already.... and none were associated with stone tool production