5.3 million year old vehicle tracks found in Turkey

originally posted by: theabsolutetruth
a reply to: All Seeing Eye

It was a suggestion. Which is more plausible than 53 million year old trucks.

I think the ''rocks'' look like mud, if you actually read the comments.

As for the sarcasm and stupid picture. Yawn.

continuouswave.com...

Please identify the location of your photo "Georgian Bay of Lake Huron", otherwise people might think this photo is of Turkey.

a reply to: All Seeing Eye

You can read the link to ascertain exact location but it is irrelevant as such glacial landscape features are to be found worldwide.

You could find more examples on the previous links if you do not believe or are of the opinion of them being synonymous with only a certain region.

originally posted by: theabsolutetruth
a reply to: All Seeing Eye

You can read the link to ascertain exact location but it is irrelevant as such glacial landscape features are to be found worldwide.

You could find more examples on the previous links if you do not believe or are of the opinion of them being synonymous with only a certain region.

Did you watch the presentation?

The bottom of the tracks are parallel, regardless of the height of each individual track. That in itself is enough to rule out any natural event.

a reply to: All Seeing Eye

Glacial tracks can also be parallel. As I said there are examples on the links.

francisvachon.photoshelter.com...

originally posted by: theabsolutetruth
a reply to: All Seeing Eye

Glacial tracks can also be parallel. As I said there are examples on the links.

francisvachon.photoshelter.com...

Getting back on track, did you watch the presentation?

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

No, the likely truth is that it ISN'T millions of years old and the dating methods don't work. They'll come up with some explanation though and you can bet your ass that it won't involve wheeled vehicles millions of years ago OR that their dating methods are simply not accurate...

Jaden

a reply to: IndependentOpinion

They show exactly that....take a look back at the OP. The pic where a junction occurs and the track split. It is clearly not as deep there. At some point someone decided to go a different route, likely well into the first route being worn.

And you alluded to them all being done at once in soft mud by saying that and posting pics of single tracks in mud as a reference.

Wonder where all these amazing vehicles went that you appear to believe we're used to make the ruts?

I'll tell you....they were likely some type of sled made of wood to pull heavy stone. After the civilization disappeared the sleds rotted into nothingness and went back to the earth.

Please good people, do not bicker.

These tracks are obviously from a Pirelli LT265/70R17 121S.

Your suspect is a 2013 Dodge Ram 2500 Quad Cab...SLT, I think, judging from the slight toe-in wear seen in this rock formation.

Find that truck, and you'll have your answers.

Just because the rocks were dated to be a certain age doesn't mean that these formations were done all of the way back then. Not to say that this wasn't done back then, but I think it's much more likely to have been done more recent than almost 5 million years ago. Perhaps it's from the paleolithic times, perhaps before, perhaps it was recently done and it's a hoax, which unfortunately takes/has taken place.

It's very interesting. I'd like to see it excavated/tested by another source, however, who knows- it might have not even been tested at all if it is a hoax.

a reply to: Flatcoat

Unless the animals were ... flying. Dun dun dun!!!

originally posted by: lindalinda
a reply to: Flatcoat

Unless the animals were ... flying. Dun dun dun!!!

LOL....yes. Santa's sled being pulled by flying reindeer is more plausible than these being ancient vehicle doing some mudding.

Are you sure those tracks weren't made for water to flow through?

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

I thought "irrigation ditches" first, if they are 5.3MYO, but then realized that dinosaurs digging irrigation ditches would probably be more impressive than dinos out muddin'.

Soooo, here's the 4 options I can come up with:

-recent somehow (I know, great answer, right? BCSiMH*)

-ancient advanced beings (terrestrial or otherwise)

-just another deception by that ol' horned trickster to make us think Earth is way older than 6,000-ish years old

-piss-poor "matrix" programming

originally posted by: evc1shop
I have never seen these before. Thank you!
Makes one wonder when intelligent life really started on this planet.

I have yet to see it.

I still find it hard to believe in the stories of ancient-anything in regards to advanced technology. In millions of years, I think archeologists will have no problem proving we existed. If there was a level of technology in the past that built up over time, just like it is now, the advances required, the population, the technologies, would be discovered. We'd find something. Not one gearworks clock on a sucken ship.. and nothing else. We'd find engine bits or factories or something.

And if advanced anything existed... again, they would do like we did.. build roads. They wouldn't build vehicles and then drive them in mud. And if there were ancient roadways and such.. again, we'd find some proof. There is -nothing-... so unless aliens came down, drove around and spread their knowledge.. and then took all their toys and went home, I can't believe there were advanced levels of tech in our past. We'd find -something-.

After a early cataclysmic event some boulders rolled around on a lake bed or sea floor. No big deal.

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Vasa Croe

I'm with you. Here's a picture of some ruts from the Oregon Trail:

DUDE!

They passed though the Oregon Trail 3.7 million years ago!

Oh looks like we need to rewrite history, looks like evidence of ancient advanced civilizations to me.

a reply to: fleabit
It is difficult at best to try and explain why the "Evidence" is not being found. But Ill try.

We, that is the present population on the surface of this planet, were not privy to that technology. We witnessed its use, but we, did not create that technology.

The technology, for the most part, was not based on the outer surface of our planet. When it was brought here and used, most was taken back to where it was based. There was no intention to educate us on its design or use.

So, we see the footprints, but not the foot. The technology was not intended for us. As a parallel, we do not give farm animals pots and pans, or automobiles. You say that's ridiculous? Think about it. It is said we used to be naked, and drink water with the animals.

Anyways, that's the short answer. It wasn't our technology to leave laying around

originally posted by: dollukka
a reply to: LABTECH767

Weichselian ice age started about 115 000 years ago and ended about 11 500 years ago. This ice age was not as huge as previous ones but it´s ice coverage was quite large. If we think about when melting how much water it would release and how far away.

Turkey in other hand is between mediterranean sea and black sea and next map shows a bit what happens when water levels rise

Just saying what we see in pictures could be due flooding

this is a distraction map. up to 9000bc there was no mediteranean sea. It was the middle earth, you all speak about Atlantis, but they didnt teach you about middle earth as well? All my country Hellas, was land and you could walk in egypt, by feet. There is a reason they found ancient artifacts/statues near israel seas...

Everything changed after the war and the sunk of Atlantis and middle earth. We call it Αιγηΐδα

it is just the history they promote for a couple of thousand of year now, that is a totally fake and manipulation.. so I would also say, look at the facts and the truth is out there... Especially not in ur books (lol). It was convinient for them to hide that from you, because, what kind of earthquake, can sunk a huge like the half america land (Poseidonia/atlantis) and also mid earth... something else happened is it. The manipulation and fakery started after the cataclysmic to be honnest..

I also think we had a different clima, because the main product was bananas and tropical fruits.