It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: plube
a reply to: Punisher75
Sadly enough punisher...there is only one possible thing to say to you sir...your correct
It is only going to be the people!e who accept it as a possibility that the US government could do such a thing that are going to realise how it operates.
So no point in discussing it any further...people know the truth but the masses have succumbed... Shame we are going to be dragged down with the ship.
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
THEY will disregard as a commie source like always.
originally posted by: amazing
It would be great if Russia had some inside information and released it. Bad for the US government and really good for the people.
Truth is always the best thing.
Just a little off topic but in regards to an earlier post. Someone can have questions about 9/11 without being a "Truther" I hate labels like that.
I have lots of questions, still not convinced that it was a complete inside job, but I have questions about Saudi Arabia's involvement, and building 7 and the intel we had on these guys way before it happened yet did nothing about it.. and on and on. It's good to have questions. Truth is always good.
originally posted by: plube
a reply to: jaffo
Thanks for the opinion jaffo....just wondering why if so called truthers are so offensive....why even bother partaking in the discussions...
This is speculative...no matter the source...and as stated we are in the midst of a propaganda war...so let's see what info gets released...then let us truthers discuss it with the labels...then...and only if,it does do what it says on the tin....we will say...after all these years told you so...but most truthers don't require this so called smoking gun info...we have spent years analysing the evidence...and guess what...INSIDE JOB...this possible evidence is jot for truthers....it would be for the deniers.
originally posted by: jaffo
And yes, this Pearl Harbor things really irks me. My God, so many younger people take that pile of complete feces and quote it as though it were true. It is not true. IT IS A LIE, PLAIN AND SIMPLE. I mean, my God, the IDIOCY of "allowing" that to happen and just giving up A MASSIVE PORTION OF OUR PACIFIC FLEET is so stupid as to defy ANY attempt to justify such an alleged plan. For crying out loud, trying to somehow BLAME AMERICA for an illegal surprise Japanese attack?! ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!
originally posted by: ISawItFirst
originally posted by: jaffo
And yes, this Pearl Harbor things really irks me. My God, so many younger people take that pile of complete feces and quote it as though it were true. It is not true. IT IS A LIE, PLAIN AND SIMPLE. I mean, my God, the IDIOCY of "allowing" that to happen and just giving up A MASSIVE PORTION OF OUR PACIFIC FLEET is so stupid as to defy ANY attempt to justify such an alleged plan. For crying out loud, trying to somehow BLAME AMERICA for an illegal surprise Japanese attack?! ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!
There is tons of evidence. Rear admiral Kimmel has written a book and given interviews. There was a court marshall. There is mountains of evidence that we at least let it happen.
How many admirals did the pac fleet go through in the time leading up the the 7th. And why?
There is so much info. Have fun shattering your paradigm with google.
originally posted by: jaffo
And yes, this Pearl Harbor things really irks me. My God, so many younger people take that pile of complete feces and quote it as though it were true. It is not true. IT IS A LIE, PLAIN AND SIMPLE. I mean, my God, the IDIOCY of "allowing" that to happen and just giving up A MASSIVE PORTION OF OUR PACIFIC FLEET is so stupid as to defy ANY attempt to justify such an alleged plan. For crying out loud, trying to somehow BLAME AMERICA for an illegal surprise Japanese attack?! ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!
originally posted by: dr1234
I want to disagree with the whole "U.S. citizens won't care" idea. People are mad, let me tell you. The anger doesn't trump the relatively high standard of living we have, yet. It's getting close though, and we're a society that demands evidence (for the most part) before acting extremely. If this was conclusive... well I don't share you're optimism (or is it pessimism?) that things will be civil. Heads would roll.
So why is the "echoed" Pravda source identical to the original?
Both from the 2-7-2015.
How could they have picked it up from a source that came 8 days after their own source?
& where does the second one say they got it from SOTF, if it's identical to the apparent first source which came 8 days prior to SOTF & ConspiracyClub?