Curiosity: Potential Anomalies (2015)

a reply to: Clonevandal

google translate would never have picked up the 'letting on' implication present in that last sentence. but your stoic statement does

funbox

a reply to: funbox

you are such a poet funbox. Your talents might be wasted on rocks...

So I was browsing the UKs tabloids and came across this article. One can only assume as to where they got the pics and when mention conspiracy theorists they mean ATS lol

What do you think
www.mirror.co.uk...

I think the Mirror was having a slow news day. Those pics are old and have been seen and discussed. Some pics are from Curiosity and some from Opportunity.

Great click-bait for people who are not as up-to-date as us.

BUT, just imagine that ATS wasnt here and we thought they were the most up-to-date photos of Mars' surface. As an Englishman i dont read the tabloids as they are full of s***.

Here on ATS is the best place to be for the latest 'Whats that?' photos.

a reply to: Moohide
No I understand s too think the tabloids are complete crap

Sorry didn't know the pics were from different rovers the article only mentioned curiosity but then I'm not totally up to date with what pics have been posted
It made me chuckle when I was flicking through the pictures and was thinking 'yup seen that one .. And that one .. Yes that one too'

Think you're right though .. Slow news day

a reply to: MarioOnTheFly



the poetry was all yours Mario , the lady still makes me grin

funbox

originally posted by: Moohide
I think the Mirror was having a slow news day. Those pics are old and have been seen and discussed. Some pics are from Curiosity and some from Opportunity.

Great click-bait for people who are not as up-to-date as us.

BUT, just imagine that ATS wasnt here and we thought they were the most up-to-date photos of Mars' surface. As an Englishman i dont read the tabloids as they are full of s***.

Here on ATS is the best place to be for the latest 'Whats that?' photos.

You call a pyramid on Mars click bait? Many on ATS have realized some if not many of these pictures, but not all (some are just rocks) show incontrovertible evidence of either past and/or current civilizations on Mars.

So if you are inferring that all of us on here think there is nothing to any of these pictures, please dispense with your "forced/implied" consensus tactics.

a reply to: PlanetXisHERE

but not all (some are just rocks) show incontrovertible evidence of either past and/or current civilizations on Mars.

If it was incontrovertible evidence there wouldn't be any controversy about it.

a reply to: PlanetXisHERE

Pyramid? Must of missed the newspaper that day. Please show us this evidence you claim to have that is not able to be denied or disputed. Who built it? Is it 4 sided? 8 sided? What are its dimensions? Did it serve a purpose? Are you wasting our time?

Look, I come on here for fun and have read every page of these 2 anomolies threads. I like to like to see things in the pictures (Pareidolia), but i also try to keep it real.

We are all here because we are interested in Mars and its features, and its odd shaped rocks.

a reply to: Moohide

There is no pyramid

a reply to: zazzafrazz

I was being sarcastic, i know theres no pyramid, tell that to PlanetXisHERE

a reply to: Moohide

I know you were. Just reconfirming.

a reply to: funbox

ah...good ol' Dead. A true trash classic.

Thanks for the memories

a reply to: zazzafrazz

are you sure ?



funbox

I don't care that it's a natural formation. It's still freakin' awesome.

mars.jpl.nasa.gov...

Camouflaged Martian Spider:

mars.jpl.nasa.gov...

a reply to: Blue Shift

Nice catch, i took a second look at that picture



Cat
Hedgehog
Skull
Spider (you spotted the molt remains)


Sorry for quality, can someone enhance the "Cat" with PS or something?

originally posted by: Blue Shift
Camouflaged Martian Spider:

mars.jpl.nasa.gov...

That's an interesting find, it seems to have shadows under it so the "legs" are holding up something, maybe washed out by old-time water erosion and wind buffeting for a zillion million years or so, give or take a zillion. Nice. And that long spoon-like structure, a fantastic feature on Mars whatever the size.

a reply to: Moohide

Hi, and am glad to meet anyone who has read every page of the two threads. Can you please write a longer critique or summary of what you experienced reading the threads? You've seen the flow of the pages, how thinks have come up and then sank in the sand (I got carried away and didn't curb my enthusiasm several times, and was often taught lessons in what's-not-on-Mars), and further observations of your experience would be appreciated. Thanks! I agree with what you say in your post. The good stuff here, to me meaning a 1 percent chance of maybe, is few and far between (but coming quickly again it seems). The ones I count as potentially important Curiosity and thread discoveries are usually fossil-looking objects which seem to fall into several distinct species of exomarine biology. Lots of the other stuff is either fun or nonsense, themselves enjoyable aspects along the way of a well taken journey.

originally posted by: Blue Shift
I don't care that it's a natural formation. It's still freakin' awesome.

mars.jpl.nasa.gov...

how is nobody quoting this. GUYS, ARE YOU KIDDING ME??? WHAT IS THIS?