Black Triangle UFOs and an Alleged Breakaway Civilization- Discuss

a reply to: Baddogma

That book 'Incident at Devil's Den' might need more careful perusing.

Here's the very short and free version at Strange Outdoors.

a reply to: Baddogma

I wasn't going to return to ATS except for a project thread I started. I realised there is sometimes too much disclosure for people. I realised there needs to be an element of doubt for people to be comfortable.

Oh... and if this IS as real as some people are saying, and anyone is freaking out and this discussion isn't sanctioned, somewhere, I'd rather keep quiet than, er... say, face untimely death.

"Sanctioned". Hmm. I would think you would have to have signed a non-disclosure letter or have taken an oath in a secret society to get into trouble.

Or you could rescue an "orb" sentience, access its mind and be threat to their security that way. That's like hacking into a UFO mainframe. That's why they did what they did.

That aside, I'm in the business of wanting to bring an end to the trade in humans and "others" as "technology and spare parts". So I'm only a threat to those who choose to trade in that sort of thing.

Bigelow once said that this was serious stuff and people get hurt. He's just stating a fact. ATS is full of people who got hurt, that is why they are here. To try and get answers so they can understand.

That's why I talk openly.

afterthought

I wonder if Mr Springer would give you permission to do a thread on "whatsthisthen" like you have done on "A". I give permission and would undertake to stay out of it.

Against the ATS terms and conditions I understand. So Mr Springer would need to sanction.

Nor would I read it.

Never saw this video before. A size and capability perspective of the craft.
Military.com Triangle video

a reply to: Whatsthisthen


stick round. gonna be some good stuff coming i feel. too much stuff goin down lately.

a reply to: yuppa

I've things to do, perhaps connected with "good stuff coming" as you say yuppa. I hope that was not a wry "good".

But I have to step back from here and go there shall we say. And really I am waiting to see the radiation monitors at Fukushima take a marked drop. Then I will know.

There are also "those" who want to keep the fires of uranium burning and I have to deal with them. I have new friends that want to help there.

Work to do and maybe I have frightened a few people so a break from me might be good.

I still like to read ATS but contributing in a positive way? Hmmm.

Just have to tidy a little can of worms I opened on another thread.

Have a word with your young lady about reincarnation options opening in Australia, you might be surprised.

a reply to: Whatsthisthen

will do. well good luck in this new venture.

a reply to: yuppa

Not so much new, been at it for some time, been sorta building towards a goal.

If you want to build a house, first learn serveying, then bricklaying, then carpentry, then electrics, water and so on.

I won't be far.

Things do appear to be speeding up a tad... this is a blast from 2014, but there looks to be some new activity with LMSkunkworks on their portable fusion plant...

www.lockheedmartin.com...

a reply to: Baddogma

it says connection not private when I click on link

a reply to: BASSPLYR

It's just the same LM info about the fusion engine with a video I hadn't seen, but you likely have... talking about the newer, smaller plane sized version ... search compact fusion Lockheed.

A friend sent it and said it was "new" but that has a relative meaning.

Don't get me wrong, still cool as heck and game changing, hopefully.

a reply to: Whatsthisthen

Well, if you are still glancing in, as far as a thread by me I'm not exactly qualified or able (not that that stopped me in the past), however, why don't you start one? I'd certainly be riveted and would ask some questions. It sorta depends on your participation, though.

It would also be interesting to "prove" the info ... if it IS possible to actually prove in the excepted ways, that it . I guess if Fuki undergoes a rapid cooling, then the thread readers would likely raise some eyebrows.

However, I've found it's lovely to conjecture... and safer, overall.

Erm... and I have a basic question: "what type of energy is consciousness/"spirit" composed of?" EM as many say... and if so, why the problems detecting it?

a reply to: Baddogma

Hi Bd -

The link worked fine for me - very interesting, however...

...I searched all over that Lockheed site and couldn't find a scrap of info more current than that original 2014 stuff, which makes me wonder (to go full on conspiracy) if certain 'powers' in the fossil fuels industry might have pressured Lockheed to lay off the Compact Fusion research..

a reply to: Baddogma

Yeah ATS still sucks me in, like everyone else I spose. I am human afterall. ; )

Fukushima is the one that will be the third "coincidence". The "Put up or shut up".

Doubt is perhaps the best cushion we can have, a comphy place to be.

To ask: "what type of energy . . ."

Is to presume consciousness is energy. Is it?

Fukushima. Safecast has a website I watch that monitors radiation levels worldwide.

To remove doubt there means hope for the future. Also comphy.

a reply to: Whatsthisthen

presume consciousness is energy. Is it?

No clue as I only experience a teensy sliver of it... guess it not being "energy" or anything quantifiable in this "setting" makes more sense ... if sense has anything to do with it, that is.

As for doubt... I've got it, bad, about most everything. Doesn't stop me from trying to erase it, though.

a reply to: lostgirl

Yeah, maybe... like the 200 mpg carburetor, cold fusion and infra-sound growing new teeth.

The guy who sent the link probably just stumbled on it, but LM wouldn't have said anything in 2014 if it was unsure. They did say 5 years or so, though.

I sure hope this "buzz" and confluence of data reveals some big paradigm changes, though. I'm not so sure there's any adults in charge and we're spinning merrily toward a premature extinction if some of this tech doesn't surface... betting things will get ugly even with it all coming out, unfortunately. We're not prepared for what is likely coming soon to an ecosystem near you.

a reply to: Baddogma


LM. tech went black.

a reply to: yuppa

If their compact fusion went black, you'd think they'd take it off their product page... right? But I differ to you in this subject, Yup.

Oh, and yeah, the message was from someone who missed the big LM message of 2014 and just had their mind blown... heh, but they heard new "buzz" about it and he "has friends" in places that might know... but it's a "my Uncle's friend said" sorta deal.

a reply to: Baddogma


I posted the update a week ago when the patents were granted: ATS, Alt. News - Lockheed says makes breakthrough on Fusion Energy project.

They have several reactor designs for various outputs. They updated their own previously released info, and have a cool schematic of their confinement scheme (in their patent link). The patents were granted Feb. 15 but the "news" was not found until March 20-something.

I don't think it would "go black" as it coming out of the black and into the white (hmmm? Sounds like a cool song title!). A_0 even went a little out of his way to not say anything about the CFR (in today's snowflake world, it probably would be considered racist!) My sighting of... whatever, came from after talking about LM fusion reactor for an hour. It was like, "OK Mr. Know-it-all, explain this!"

Like other fusion reactors coming out of MIT, it has a molten salt blanket for heat exchange to extract the heat out of the reactor. And like I posted, it is the computer controls for a distributed power grid that should be thought about (the fusion reactor is a given at this point, to me).

This was the first real news out of Lockheed since the October 2014 announcement!

Little by little... everything changes!

a reply to: Baddogma

I think it has more to do with the fusor configuration. Sort of like how the US still funds tokamak and some stellarator research because they are definitely interested in torodial magnetic confinement schemes, just not for fusion research. We've been allegedly steering (or stirring might be more apt) some interesting substances with lasers and/or magnetic fields for a good while now.

a reply to: TEOTWAWKIAIFF

Maybe the deuterium superfluid or even supersolid is possible after all.