Black Triangle UFOs and an Alleged Breakaway Civilization- Discuss

a reply to: TEOTWAWKIAIFF

I was hoping you'd illuminate me, thanks TEOT! Bingo. Little by little... if any of this suppressed tech stuff holds the h20 I think it does, it will still be dribbling out for our mutant descendants centuries to come... here's hoping sooner than later (as in too late).

Oh... as far as the molten salt blanker, too bad that greedy inventor never revealed his Starlite formula before croaking... supposedly could stand up to fission, wonder about fusion... then again, if A is truthy-ish, then they have material science done...and it answers where the material with exotic isotopes Bigelow has comes from... though passing critters from parts unknown undoubtedly occurs, rarely, too, from my "studies."

originally posted by: Baddogma
a reply to: yuppa

If their compact fusion went black, you'd think they'd take it off their product page... right? But I differ to you in this subject, Yup.

Oh, and yeah, the message was from someone who missed the big LM message of 2014 and just had their mind blown... heh, but they heard new "buzz" about it and he "has friends" in places that might know... but it's a "my Uncle's friend said" sorta deal.

Well I didnt know they updated the info on the LM. Thank goodness they are going to keep it white for now.

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: Baddogma


LM. tech went black.

maybe it's slowely coming out if the black and been around for a while on naval vessels and they got something better now.

a reply to: Baddogma

No problem! They tried to sneak that one by. Somebody at the patent office told their friend at The Drive what passed through. That is when the article went up. I was a day or two late... yeah, kind of following this one!

a reply to: yuppa

They tried to be sneaky! (see above). They also included a "nuclear fusion airplane" in their packet of submissions. As superconductor magnet tech gets better, I wonder how small they can shrink it?

a reply to: BASSPLYR

What is that one aerospace company that does all that networked warfare stuff? Oh yeah! Lockheed. Their CFR patents have a section that seems kind of obvious: computer controls. What is the most optimal way to put computers to work? Network them together. Lockheed also has an energy storage plan. Put the three ideas together and you kind of see what LM has in mind.

a reply to: TEOTWAWKIAIFF

there are a couple of MIC firms that are really good at C5ISR. all of them know that it's the future. family of systems. system of systems etc.

a reply to: TEOTWAWKIAIFF

Makes you wonder if this has anything to do with some of the speculated propulsion mechanisms. I've been reading some interesting stuff lately about superstate transitions forming metallic crystals, namely hydrogen and how you can maintain superfluidity and superconductivity in the same phase state (transition after metallic solid? I am not sure right at this moment). I also read an interesting symposium put on the the ARL that was talking about superconductivity directly from the vacuum, no fancy ultracold quantum fluids necessary. If I can find the PDF (to the cloud!), I'll link it.

As far as Lockheed, I was under the impression that the secret sauce was in the fusor arrangements? I thought they didn't really deviate too far from the original Polywell-style design. I could definitely be wrong though (probably am).

a reply to: DirtyBizzler

I'd love to read a pdf about superconductivity directly from the vacuum

a reply to: BASSPLYR

Aren't most of the subs to Lockheed or NG at this point? All of the available project information I can find lists those two as the big dogs, and folks like L3, Raytheon, and BAE as smaller subs on a larger project. I guess it helps a lot when your the one that builds the buses. Also helps when you have an in-house solution like SPIDER photonic chips and maybe something like this to serve as DSP/ECC for use with classical systems (They are all PDFs on my Google Drive, but here's the patent numbers):

Patent # US 8,620,166 B2
" " US 8,358,723 B1

m.marketwired.com...

Some interesting NASA stuff in the same vein. You have to scroll up to get to the good stuff:

books.google.com... =en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwizzfHE25XaAhUn54MKHQ8BDiY4ChDoATAFegQIAxAB#v=onepage&q=dolinar%20receiver%20patent&f=false

Another random thought, since this is done by laser beam, I wonder if you could use the PC trick as an ECC mechanism for a data stream like you would for beam correction?

a reply to: BASSPLYR

Well, sir, at least I can give you the search string:

"Modern Topics in Energy and Power Technical
Meeting
by Tsvetanka Zheleva, Edward Shaffer, Dennis Bushnell, and
Nino Pereira"

Relevant section is titled:

"Empty Space: The Multilayered, Multicolored Superconductor"

Looks like it was a nifty symposium put on by the ARL. More likely a fishing expedition. I haven't looked into any of the keynote speaker's work for that particular subject, but I definitely plan to. It looks like they covered every cool ARL/AFRL/NRL project under the sun. Would be fun to be a fly on that wall.

a reply to: DirtyBizzler

Phase state transitions can hold all kinds of tasty items there.

The thought crossed my mind when the magic bilayer graphene sC story came up. If they are doing slow disclosure those are the articles I pay attention to.

Thanks for the confirmation bias! lol.

a reply to: DirtyBizzler

oooh am i going to have a fun time reading these links! thanks buddy!!!

Integrated electrical pathways in 3D printing anyone?
3D printing

a reply to: BASSPLYR

No problem, just don't go emailing anyone, haha.

I love how there's this big contingent of guests from prestegious universities and then there's the lone guy from Purdue. You would never know driving through Lafayette that there is a world-class aerospace and engineering program there. I guess same applies to Rose-Hulman (Terre Haute smells like a fart).

a reply to: Blackfinger

Wonder if this kind of stuff is why we stopped hearing about sonofusion? Replace cavitation and bubbles with quantum vortices in a superfluid medium (like deuterium). It's one of those things like quasicrystals and graphene that all made major mainstream scientific publications in the late 90's and early 2000's to just vanish into thin air.

"OMG, this stuff is going to revolutionize everything! Look!"
Years later...
"Hey, what happened to all that revolutionary stuff you guys were talking about?"
"What revolutionary stuff?"
"The Harvard/MIT/Penn State/UC/Rice U/WSU revolutionary stuff."
"What's a 'Penn State'?"

Edit: Whoops, meant for TEOT, but still applicable to basically anything talked about in this thread.

a reply to: DirtyBizzler

There was EM/gravitic research that did that thing: big news item, then quietly go work for some aerospace company with NDA and IP rules.

Even such "harmless" things like organic redox flow batteries that Harvard made. Big splash, a partnership, then... crickets. It has been 8 years. Even the Princeton reactor upgrade SNAFU where they put in copper pipes (!!!) for refrigeration to nearly break one the superconducting coils "was supposed to only be shut us down for a year," well, that year passed last October.

And we are still using gasoline.

It might go something like this: one day we have 1900s technology, the very next day, practically free energy and interstellar spaceships. Most people will shrug and get on with their day never wondering how it was all "solved" in such a short time. The rest of us, who questioned and guessed, will be kind of PO'd (along with running around for bragging rights, lol), but we to will have to get on with life.

That is the problem with secret technology. The holders only see one use while the others of us have imaginations and crazy dreams which might lead to someplace (as in "better human condition") even better.

a reply to: TEOTWAWKIAIFF

Sounds a lot like Gravity Probe B.

"Where are those amazing gravity revelations from that Gravity Probe B you guys launched?"
"We cannot confirm or deny the existence of Gravity or the letter B".

a reply to: TEOTWAWKIAIFF

And we are still using gasoline

Seriously... burning stuff for power in the 21st century!? What suppressed tech?

Sometimes the baser, more violent instincts that rail against gross paternalism and sneering elitism roar to the fore.
I can't bring to mind all the promising tech that joined the cricket choir... but I guess nobody lies or protects the profit pyramids and the tech just didn't pan out... yeah.

And gravity probe B? Sigh, I smell more righteous indignation.

originally posted by: Baddogma
a reply to: TEOTWAWKIAIFF

And we are still using gasoline

Seriously... burning stuff for power in the 21st century!? What suppressed tech?

Sometimes the baser, more violent instincts that rail against gross paternalism and sneering elitism roar to the fore.
I can't bring to mind all the promising tech that joined the cricket choir... but I guess nobody lies or protects the profit pyramids and the tech just didn't pan out... yeah.

And gravity probe B? Sigh, I smell more righteous indignation.

Can anyone break down the Gravity Probe B stuff for me please? I read the Wiki on it but it is beyond me to get anything substantial from it. What would be the supposed or purported revelations from the results?

a reply to: Baddogma
Destabilizing the worlds grip on fossil fuels new tech would..Why its only on cutting edge stuff...WEAV is something else that just up and disappeared..Em Drive will go the same way eventually.Mr Joe Blow everyday human wouldnt break his internet on something world blowing happening.
Gravity Probe B
Space stuff

a reply to: sputniksteve

Uhm, it gave a pretty strong confirmation that local inertial reference frames aren't necessarily coupled to the universe at large in the presence of a large rotating mass.