It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: HauntWok
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
We the people wouldn't be allowed to. The gun caliphate would forcibly remove any gun control candidate.
That is of course if we were allowed to vote at all. Most likely a fascist regime would be implemented with the people completely taken out of the election process.
originally posted by: HauntWok
Another "law abiding gun owner" uses pre emptive self defense.
Still need less gun laws? I guess this guy thought so too.
I guess the pro gun crowd might say that he had every right to kill those children by virtue of him having a gun.
Good job pro gun crowd, chalk this up as another win for your cause.
originally posted by: HauntWok
a reply to: spirited75
Eliminating data sets in order to come up with a conclusion that fits your narrative is bad science.
It's like saying that knives kill more than rifles, eliminating shotguns, and pistols skews the data set
It's dishonest.
originally posted by: HauntWok
a reply to: Another_Nut
Not a whole lot of life, liberty, and pursuits of happiness that goes on in a nation that does not allow the free elections of the people that the citizens want.
And here we are, the crux if the problem with the pro gun crowd. Its not about the freedom to be armed, its about the power to take away the freedoms of the people of this nation at the end of a gun.
It's about the dismantling of all liberty, disposing of a government by the people, and installing a regime of fascism and a rule not of the will of the people, but the rule of might and force.
originally posted by: HauntWok
a reply to: Another_Nut
Not a whole lot of life, liberty, and pursuits of happiness that goes on in a nation that does not allow the free elections of the people that the citizens want.
And here we are, the crux if the problem with the pro gun crowd. Its not about the freedom to be armed, its about the power to take away the freedoms of the people of this nation at the end of a gun.
It's about the dismantling of all liberty, disposing of a government by the people, and installing a regime of fascism and a rule not of the will of the people, but the rule of might and force.
originally posted by: HauntWok
a reply to: Daedalus
No, it's just dishonest. Those four cities whether you like it or not are part of the united states.
This shows the desperation the gun crowd has in this argument. Why they are so desperate to shut down all discussion.
The other extremely worrying aspect is the plan the gun crowd has to remove constitutionally elected people from our government. We the people would be forever disenfranchised our right to choose our own representatives. It would be a puppet democracy, as we the people would be robbed at gunpoint the freedom of a free election. Any candidate who said they were against the gun caliphate would be forcibly removed from the election process, only those that pledged loyalty to the gun caliphate would be allowed to be voted for.
CALIPHATE cal·iph·ate [kal-uh-feyt, -fit, key-luh-]
noun
the rank, jurisdiction, or government of a caliph.
Also, califate, kalifate, khalifate. Origin: 1725–35; caliph + -ate3
CALIPH [key-lif, kal-if]
noun
1. a spiritual leader of Islam, claiming succession from Muhammad.
2. any of the former Muslim rulers of Baghdad (until 1258) and of the Ottoman Empire (from 1571 until 1924).
Also, calif, kalif, kaliph, khalif.
Origin: 1350–1400; Middle English caliphe, califfe < Middle French < Medieval Latin calipha < Arabic khalīf ( a ) successor (of Muhammad), derivative of khalafa succeed
originally posted by: HauntWok
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
We the people wouldn't be allowed to. The gun caliphate would forcibly remove any gun control candidate.
That is of course if we were allowed to vote at all. Most likely a fascist regime would be implemented with the people completely taken out of the election process.
originally posted by: HauntWok
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
I am of course talking about Daedalus' plan to forcibly remove constitutionally elected persons in our government. Thus destroying the constitution this nation is founded on.
originally posted by: HauntWok
From this post
Saying it's the right of the gun caliphate to remove constitutionally elected people of this nation by force if they deem them "harmful" ie: don't tow the line of the gun caliphate.
And we are supposed to trust that the government that they choose would fairly represent the people?
originally posted by: HauntWok
a reply to: Another_Nut
Not a whole lot of life, liberty, and pursuits of happiness that goes on in a nation that does not allow the free elections of the people that the citizens want.
And here we are, the crux if the problem with the pro gun crowd. Its not about the freedom to be armed, its about the power to take away the freedoms of the people of this nation at the end of a gun.
It's about the dismantling of all liberty, disposing of a government by the people, and installing a regime of fascism and a rule not of the will of the people, but the rule of might and force.
originally posted by: HauntWok
How can that not be the end game of the gun caliphate? The systematic deconstruction of the very constitution they are apparently advocating for?
The very argument of the gun caliphate is to forcibly remove constitutionally elected officials from office that they deem "harmful", in this way the people are disenfranchised from making their voices heard in a free election.
Only candidates that the gun caliphate deem worthy of running for office will be able to run for office, all others will be "forcibly removed" and the people that support those candidates will, then will be silenced.
What's to stop them from installing a government that removes other liberties from the people? Obviously after their coup d'état and the removal (read: public execution) of all previously constitutionally elected individuals from office that they deem "harmful" only those that follow along with the overall agenda of the gun caliphate will be allowed presence in our government.
You can't assume that after such a coup d'état of our government by the radical gun caliphate that they would allow free elections of people like the ones that they previously have forcibly removed from the government.
But that's the game isn't it? Remove all obstacles to unfettered and unrestricted gun access, allow a pro gun violence type of society to thrive till the government of the people and by the people is actually forced to crack down on the problem, then violently overthrow that government under the guise that the government is limiting the freedom of the people, then install a fascist regime bereft of actual liberty of the people.
originally posted by: HauntWok
a reply to: NavyDoc
I've seen through this charade for a long time now, that's why I don't support the right wing at all.
The same people you see in threads like this on the pro gun side are the same people who either have said outright or believe that Americans have the right to execute people they suspect of being in this country illegally.
The same people you see in threads like this on the pro gun side are the same people who want to ban gay people from marrying with a constitutional amendment
The same people you see in threads like this on the pro gun side are the same people who think that the 13th Amendment is fake. (yes, there are people on these boards that actually believe this hunk of malarkey)
The same people you see in threads like this on the pro gun side are the same people who think the declaration of independence is their own personal license to kill their fellow countrymen.
The same people you see in threads like this on the pro gun side are the same people who believe that Obama was born in Kenya and is the Anti-Christ.
originally posted by: HauntWok
a reply to: NavyDoc
I've seen through this charade for a long time now, that's why I don't support the right wing at all.
The same people you see in threads like this on the pro gun side are the same people who either have said outright or believe that Americans have the right to execute people they suspect of being in this country illegally.
The same people you see in threads like this on the pro gun side are the same people who want to ban gay people from marrying with a constitutional amendment
The same people you see in threads like this on the pro gun side are the same people who think that the 13th Amendment is fake. (yes, there are people on these boards that actually believe this hunk of malarkey)
The same people you see in threads like this on the pro gun side are the same people who think the declaration of independence is their own personal license to kill their fellow countrymen.
The same people you see in threads like this on the pro gun side are the same people who believe that Obama was born in Kenya and is the Anti-Christ.
originally posted by: HauntWok
a reply to: NavyDoc
I've seen through this charade for a long time now, that's why I don't support the right wing at all.
The same people you see in threads like this on the pro gun side are the same people who either have said outright or believe that Americans have the right to execute people they suspect of being in this country illegally.
The same people you see in threads like this on the pro gun side are the same people who want to ban gay people from marrying with a constitutional amendment
The same people you see in threads like this on the pro gun side are the same people who think that the 13th Amendment is fake. (yes, there are people on these boards that actually believe this hunk of malarkey)
The same people you see in threads like this on the pro gun side are the same people who think the declaration of independence is their own personal license to kill their fellow countrymen.
The same people you see in threads like this on the pro gun side are the same people who believe that Obama was born in Kenya and is the Anti-Christ.
originally posted by: HauntWok
So, after the gun caliphate forcibly removes constitutionally elected members of our government that they deem "harmful" why do you think that they would allow free elections that might put those same "harmful" people back in office?
At that point, they already destroyed the democratic process and removed the voice of the people. And you think they would stop there?
Instead of just installing a fascist regime of gun caliphate loyalists to dictate to the people the agenda they will have already forced on the populous.