It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jmdewey60
a reply to: AfterInfinityMaybe saying "I'm God" would be too inaccurate of a description to be strictly honest.
Because if he didn't care enough to be honest with me about who he was, then I don't care to know him anyway. I don't like double standards, and I definitely don't like being lied to. And a lie by omission is still a lie.
What is really out there I would imagine defies human description.
originally posted by: lysacid
a reply to: Antigod
If God proved his existence to us in a way that nobody had doubt of him then God would have people following him for the wrong reasons. Many people would follow him simply because they knew he was there and not because they truly wanted to follow. God displaying his existence would create the wrong kind of follower. True faith and belief only comes by ones choices.
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: ScientiaFortisDefendit Well brother/sis it may be that with all the noise we experience in life with family work and the roar of political madness going on we don't hear the small voice .The best time with Him is the quiet time when we can find it but most of us jump out of bed and rush off to the day and don't really get quality time with Him . If you notice that His voice speaks clearly when he isolated them either on the top of a mountain or in a cave or under the stars of the nigh ...He did tell us to go into the closet and close the door .... ETA If you will also note that He spoke to some that didn't want to hear Him .Jonah being a good example but there were others .lots actually ..
originally posted by: lysacid
a reply to: Antigod
If God proved his existence to us in a way that nobody had doubt of him then God would have people following him for the wrong reasons. Many people would follow him simply because they knew he was there and not because they truly wanted to follow. God displaying his existence would create the wrong kind of follower. True faith and belief only comes by ones choices.
originally posted by: ScientiaFortisDefendit
a reply to: the2ofusr1
I go to church every week and don't disagree, but how does one explain why the Bible is full of accounts of people speaking with God directly? What happened in the millennia since then? Was the 'veil' between this world and the next nonexistent, or much thinner? Did God decide to stop talking to people at some point? So far no one has addressed this question to my satisfaction.
originally posted by: UB2120
a reply to: Antigod
Proof is all around you. Do you really think the complexities of our world and universe are accidental? Plus the exercise of faith is key to our type of existence. God can and does create perfect beings. Perfection is not our origin, it's our goal.
I've posted this before, but think it will be useful in this discussion.
1. Is courage — strength of character — desirable? Then must man be reared in an environment which necessitates grappling with hardships and reacting to disappointments.
2. Is altruism — service of one’s fellows — desirable? Then must life experience provide for encountering situations of social inequality.
3. Is hope — the grandeur of trust — desirable? Then human existence must constantly be confronted with insecurities and recurrent uncertainties.
4. Is faith — the supreme assertion of human thought — desirable? Then must the mind of man find itself in that troublesome predicament where it ever knows less than it can believe.
5. Is the love of truth and the willingness to go wherever it leads, desirable? Then must man grow up in a world where error is present and falsehood always possible.
6. Is idealism — the approaching concept of the divine — desirable? Then must man struggle in an environment of relative goodness and beauty, surroundings stimulative of the irrepressible reach for better things.
7. Is loyalty — devotion to highest duty — desirable? Then must man carry on amid the possibilities of betrayal and desertion. The valor of devotion to duty consists in the implied danger of default.
8. Is unselfishness — the spirit of self-forgetfulness — desirable? Then must mortal man live face to face with the incessant clamoring of an inescapable self for recognition and honor. Man could not dynamically choose the divine life if there were no self-life to forsake. Man could never lay saving hold on righteousness if there were no potential evil to exalt and differentiate the good by contrast.
9. Is pleasure — the satisfaction of happiness — desirable? Then must man live in a world where the alternative of pain and the likelihood of suffering are ever-present experiential possibilities.
originally posted by: Antigod
So far, not one of the religious posters have come up with any sort of rational argument as to why god isn't providing proof.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: adjensen
If you knew, for a fact, that the Christian God existed, would you love him for his sake, or would you "love" him because you're afraid of the consequences of not loving him?
I had a boyfriend like that once. It wasn't until I'd known him for years that I figured out that he was an "ass" who had conned me and taken advantage of my blind devotion to him.
Love is blind, you know.
But as for the Christian God, if I knew for a fact he existed and that the stories about him are true, I'd maybe "say" I loved him, but how could I really do so?? That is clearly a coerced 'affection', like a tyrant who demands homage.
And if this God can see into your heart, what good would it do to fake it? It'd be like having a lie detector test - or torture device - put on you and being asked 'do you think that guy is better than me?' Well, if I do, then what?
Here's the thing with the anthropomorphization of God (for those unfamilar with the word; it means attributing human qualities to non-human things) -- he's not a nice guy. And unconditional love does not include threats of eternal torture or the chance of being disowned. If God is a 'person', and supposedly "Our Father" - well, he's a crap parent. Abusive, neglectful, and scary if he's around - absentee if he's not. Crap parenting all the way.
I agree with you about the hellfire preaching - it's so destructive. It doesn't build up a person, it tears them down with neverending uncertainty of being "good enough". Crap love. Not unconditional love. Brutality and control.
No thanks.
If it was my dad, I'd run away. If it was my boyfriend or husband, I'd break up with him. Or throw him out. Or both. All three. Who needs that kind of treatment? NO ONE likes to be yelled at, written up, shamed, humiliated, hurt. Some don't mind being bossed around, but, well.....
yeah NO. God isn't a person, nor a parent, nor a caring 'shepherd.' That's the best I can come up with.