Aliens made Pumapunku? (CampKill)

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian

a reply to: bottleslingguy

sure it may not be a right angle but the important thing to remember is that the block next to it would've had the opposite angle in order to fit perfectly.

Then that needs to be shown. And then why is the AA expert going around with a square?

OK. That is quite impressive stone work. But then am I being misled by someone walking around with a square? Someone is misleading me.

It is not impressive enough to evoke aliens.

Such work has been done all over the world, thousands of years earlier, with images left by the makers showing how they did it. Look at my post above for evidence of such, complete with images left by ancient people showing what they did, and scientific/historical explanations on how its all done.

MM

a reply to: Mr Mask

It is not impressive enough to evoke aliens.

To be fair, alien stone work could suck monkey nuts.

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Mr Mask

It is not impressive enough to evoke aliens.

To be fair, alien stone work could suck monkey nuts.

To be fair, that may be true...

BUT to be "correct" there is zero evidence that alines helped create a single work of stone known to man.

MM

a reply to: Mr Mask

BUT to be "correct" there is zero evidence that aliens helped create a single work of stone known to man

Are you saying that the aliens from ancient times were to lazy to help or just invoking the prime directive?

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Mr Mask

BUT to be "correct" there is zero evidence that aliens helped create a single work of stone known to man

Are you saying that the aliens from ancient times were to lazy to help or just invoking the prime directive?

No you are just being silly. And you know it.

HUGS!

MM

a reply to: ZetaRediculian

can you not think for yourself? make up your own mind? decide for yourself? So we just sweep the "impressive stone work" subject out the window? do you have any idea how many mistakes they would've made making ALL those angled cuts and corresponding angles unless they were technologically and mechanically sophisticated? The official story is ropes, logs and copper saws, I call it bamboo technology like they used on Gilligan's Island.

originally posted by: Mr Mask

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Mr Mask

It is not impressive enough to evoke aliens.

To be fair, alien stone work could suck monkey nuts.

To be fair, that may be true...

BUT to be "correct" there is zero evidence that alines helped create a single work of stone known to man.

MM

why isn't part of the evidence the probability that they exist and have had plenty of time to evolve, advance technologically and find a nice hospitable planet they could play with? I thought all that was definitely possible, so why do you say "zero evidence"?

a reply to: bottleslingguy

can you not think for yourself? make up your own mind?

Sure I can. Can't I?

The impressive stone work is probably not alien. Is that OK?

originally posted by: bottleslingguy
why isn't part of the evidence the probability that they exist and have had plenty of time to evolve, advance technologically and find a nice hospitable planet they could play with? I thought all that was definitely possible, so why do you say "zero evidence"?

Because probability is not evidence.

Besides, what is the probability that we would be visited, even if there were dozens of spacefaring aliens with hyperdrives, when you consider there are 300 Billion stars in this galaxy alone?

Harte

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Mr Mask

BUT to be "correct" there is zero evidence that aliens helped create a single work of stone known to man

Are you saying that the aliens from ancient times were to lazy to help or just invoking the prime directive?

It's more of a Prime Guideline.

a reply to: bottleslingguy

why isn't part of the evidence the probability that they exist and have had plenty of time to evolve

Because you can't determine probability of aliens here there or anywhere without evidence of aliens. Its possible, not probable. If you think its probable, show your work.

originally posted by: bottleslingguy
a reply to: ZetaRediculian

can you not think for yourself? make up your own mind? decide for yourself? So we just sweep the "impressive stone work" subject out the window? do you have any idea how many mistakes they would've made making ALL those angled cuts and corresponding angles unless they were technologically and mechanically sophisticated? The official story is ropes, logs and copper saws, I call it bamboo technology like they used on Gilligan's Island.

I think its you who is not thinking for yourself.

Not only are there dozens and dozens of half-finished blocks on the site (including ones that broke or were failed in contraction, being left aside) there are also many imperfections on those that were used all over Pumapunku.

You just don't seem to get it...the "complexity" and "perfection" you are stating is invented by con-men. And the work that you are calling impossibly perfect and impressive was outdone thousands of years earlier by other cultures.

If anything, Pumapunku is behind 3000 year the learning curve of stone working skills.

Like I said, I took the time to link you to archeological studies and scientific tests...and you STILL ignored them.

This is why you are baffled on this subject. You remain intellectually lazy and ignore factual studies even when they are hand fed to you in plain text links...with images.

AA was made for people like you. Those goons get rich off of bamboozling you because its easy for them.

It kinda makes me sad...oh well, i tried to educate you and bring you to a higher understanding of truth. But you seem to want to embrace ignorance because you enjoy it. Have fun with that. Just know more than one person here went through laborious work to bring you studies and facts...and you tuned a blind eye so you could take the easy road to nonsense-town.

Breaks my heart to see someone so stubborn to learn.

MM

originally posted by: bottleslingguy

originally posted by: Mr Mask

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Mr Mask

It is not impressive enough to evoke aliens.

To be fair, alien stone work could suck monkey nuts.

To be fair, that may be true...

BUT to be "correct" there is zero evidence that alines helped create a single work of stone known to man.

MM

why isn't part of the evidence the probability that they exist and have had plenty of time to evolve, advance technologically and find a nice hospitable planet they could play with? I thought all that was definitely possible, so why do you say "zero evidence"?

Again, you confuse "possibility" with "evidence".

They are two different things.

And your failure to even grasp that is a direct reason why talking to you about this subject is a waste of my time.

You are not invested in finding truth or facts. You are only interested in chasing fairy tales invented by con-men. You don't even WANT to check your beliefs for holes. You just blind yourself in stubborn ignorance and refuse to even test your own convictions.

its funny that you asked someone here "can't they think for themselves"...when you clearly have allowed two dishonest men to brainwash your entire thoughts on the history of mankind.

Its sad...it really is sad. I'm sorry, but it just hurts my heart to see such a wealth of information wasted on you, while you cling to the invented nonsense of AA hucksters who laugh at your gullibility as they count their hard stolen money.

MM

a reply to: Mr Mask

No you are just being silly. And you know it.

yeah, its a thing. If I had fans, they would demand it. At any rate, we are on the same team...at least here.

a reply to: ZetaRediculian

it's actually it is very sophisticated and stable. How long will our structures last? why do we have to correlate their designs with ours today as if complex means permanent or functional? What kinds of décor are you thinking for their curtains? Besides I'd be willing to bet some of these structures were either machines themselves or part of a machine/technology thingy and not something like a hotel

a reply to: Mr Mask

it is so much more than two dishonest men and it is where your linear logic will never reach so I don't expect you'll ever get it. Nothing you've presented has proven anything.

a reply to: Mr Mask

Well done, sir. "... like Puma poo poo" -- priceless

I like the Ancient Aliens shows for the entertainment value and the what-if factor, but much of what they say is pretty easy to research as false.

originally posted by: bottleslingguy
a reply to: Mr Mask



it is so much more than two dishonest men.

You're right here.

It IS much more than just two dishonest men.

Nowadays, it's hundreds of dishonest men.

Harte

a reply to: bottleslingguy

Nothing you've presented has proven anything.

Correct since its impossible to prove aliens didn't do something or don't exist or any negative for that matter. You can only prove things have happened or that things do exist. Probability requires known things. People are known to build things. Aliens are not known to exist and are also not known to build things. Its possible not probable. Since we only know of ONE living thing capable of building anything, the most likely guess would be that. My calculations put the probability of humans building these things somewhere close to certainty. It makes zero difference what tools or techniques anyone knows or doesn't know about.

a reply to: ZetaRediculian

Taken from the "Post a Funny Picture - I'm Bored" thread on these boards - I thought it so appropriate: