It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
deeezbeats
Well Paul wouldnt have had hope if he expected them to just be destroyed anyways.
StallionDuck
reply to post by deeezbeats
It says they'll be rezurected. Not saved. Rezed and judged for life or 2nd death.
Genesis 42:33"(The righteous man Jacob)However, he said: “My son will not go down with you, because his brother is dead and he alone is left. If a fatal accident should befall him on the journey you would make, then you would certainly bring down my gray hairs to the Grave(Hell) in grief.”
2Samuel 22:6"The ropes of the Grave(Hell)* surrounded me;+The snares of death confronted me.+"
I think the part in Ecclesiastes "they have no more share in all that is done under the sun." pretty much sums up the point of those quoted scriptures.
The scripture verses you quoted in the op about ''the dead'' are referring to this intermediate stage between life and the afterlife.
Genesis 37:35
I am confused by this verse. I checked with the fourteen bibles that I have and did not find this verse in any of the fourteen bibles. Could you show me where you got that scripture?
the fact that you're refering the lake of fire as hell when they aren't even the same, let's me know you didn't read everything I posted. So I did not disprove the existence of the lake of fire, I disproved what the lake of fire is taught to be like. So show me why I didn't disprove of the mainstream lake of fire doctrine. Better yet, show me from the bible where souls are immortal and where the lake of fire is literal torture.
sk0rpi0n
@op... The Israelite religion teaches that everybody who dies remains in a state of death until the resurrection after which they will be either rewarded or punished. (See the very last verse in Daniel.) The scripture verses you quoted in the op about ''the dead'' are referring to this intermediate stage between life and the afterlife. Those verses are not disproving hell in any way.
Sheol is the same as Hades. Also referred to as pit. Both are considered the grave. I chose various translators to prove my point using more than one translation. If I stuck with only one translation, some might think the translation I used Is bias. I put Hell in parenthesis because people still confuse it with the lake of fire even though it will be thrown into the lake of fire. Rev 20:14"Then death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. The lake of fire is the second death."
Seede
reply to post by deeezbeats
Hell/Hades/Sheol = Grave
Genesis 42:33"(The righteous man Jacob)However, he said: “My son will not go down with you, because his brother is dead and he alone is left. If a fatal accident should befall him on the journey you would make, then you would certainly bring down my gray hairs to the Grave(Hell) in grief.”
I am confused by this verse. I checked with the fourteen bibles that I have and did not find this verse in any of the fourteen bibles. Could you show me where you got that scripture?
2Samuel 22:6"The ropes of the Grave(Hell)* surrounded me;+The snares of death confronted me.+"
I noticed that you have the word Hell in parenthesis. The word grave has several meanings to describe the dead. It would depend upon what the context of the meaning is. There are three main divisions in Judaism today and not all will agree with the others. The rabbi that I talked to had this explanation of 2nd Samuel 22:6. The Torah does not use Greek meanings to express their language.
The JPS bible (old testament) of "2nd Samuel 22:6 is written "The cords of Sheol surrounded me; the snares of Death confronted me."
Rabbi's interpretation of this is that grave denotes the burial of a terrestrial body but not the spirit of that corpse. While it is true that the body is covered with earth and decomposes back to the source, does not mean that the spirit does the same. It is proper for a Jew to say "grave" meaning the dead body but it is improper to denote that the Spirit of that dead body is with that corpse. Now there are some gentile religionists who do believe this and that can be viewed as "soul sleeping."
As the spirit is separated from the corpse it is contained in the underworld of this earth known as Sheol. The Judaic thought being that Sheol is the containment of spirits of the souls. Along with this is the understanding that rabbinic philosophy is not the doctrine of Jesus. Their concept of resurrection is that at the last day in this era of people there will be a general resurrection of the spirits in Sheol who are united with the corpse in the grave and judged. The doctrine of Jesus is not the same.
The word Sheol is Hebrew and means a place in this earth where the spirits are contained till the resurrection. The word Hades is a Greek word meaning the same as the Hebrew Sheol. The words Gehenna and Hell are Greek words meaning the same which is understood as deriving from the Hebrew word hinnom. The Hebrew word hinnom is strictly a descriptive word derived from the terrestrial valley of hinnom which was the garbage dump of Jerusalem at one time. There are some people who interpret this entire subject as meaning that the Greek Hell is a subterranean compartment as in the Hebrew Sheol. This is explained as there being seven compartments of separation in Sheol with hell being only one of those compartments.
As Jesus taught His doctrine, it is very doubtful that He taught in Greek. That is another subject for another time but the consensus is that
when Jesus taught people of the dead in hell, He was referring to the spirit of that person and not the corpse which is in the grave. You must consider that the word hell is Greek and translated from the Greek manuscripts and that is the reason that you will not find the Greek word hell in the Hebrew bible. It would be improper for a translator to interject his own understanding when the original is available. The translator is not to give his own view point but to try to explain the meaning of the author from which he is translating into his language. That being done does not always show the original cultural meaning of the author.
Out of eleven bibles that I have checked, I find the word Sheol in six, the word hell in three, and the word grave used in two. I did choose what I thought to be the eleven most popular bibles but could be mistaken in my choice. I notice also that you have used a variety of bibles to bring your point to light and that also is not an honest comparative examination of your thread. Why would you choose various translators to make your point? If a translator is in agreement with you in one verse but then not in another verse then you seek out another translator to agree with your viewpoint. That to me is not an honest consensus by any means. If you cannot trust the one entire translation of a literature then you are not ever going to accept other opinions and that robs you of learning. In other words you will always be right in all matters in your own understanding and that is not healthy whatsoever.
StallionDuck
reply to post by Rex282
Thanks for that...
Especially showing "Who is the Savior of ALL MEN, especially of those who believe.". That says to me that more than just those who believe will be saved. Interesting. I never noticed these words.
ALL of mankind will be delivered from the valley of the shadow of death...the physical realm of death which mankind currently "lives" in.That is the main function of deliverance/salvation.That is the GOOD news of the gospel because there is no BAD news of the gospel.
That says to me that more than just those who believe will be saved. Interesting. I never noticed these words.
BuzzyWigs
reply to post by StallionDuck
That says to me that more than just those who believe will be saved. Interesting. I never noticed these words.
Does that mean you're abandoning the 144K theory and that no one alive will ever get there?
That would just make my day.
(Not that anyone cares if they make my day).
The verse that directly follows qualifies the statement in the verse you quoted.
1 Cor 15:22For as in Adam ALL die, even so in Christ shall ALL be made alive.
I think you got out of sync because this one is Hebrews 2:9.
"But we see Jesus(Yahoshua), who was made a little lower than the angels, for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honor; that he, by the grace of God, should taste death for EVERY man."
The word "sacrifice" is added as an interpretation of the word that is in the verse, propitiation.
1 John 2:2.He [Yahoshua] is the sacrifice for our sins, and NOT for ours only but ALSO for the WHOLE world
The 2011 NIV translates it as:
1Timothy 2:3For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God OUR Savior;Who WILL have ALL men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
Text Sheol is the same as Hades. Also referred to as pit. Both are considered the grave.
BuzzyWigs
Rex282:
ALL of mankind will be delivered from the valley of the shadow of death...the physical realm of death which mankind currently "lives" in.That is the main function of deliverance/salvation.That is the GOOD news of the gospel because there is no BAD news of the gospel.
..............
Yes.
Universally.
Sorry if you've discussed it before, but - do you believe in reincarnation? (I'm assuming here that you don't believe in Hell or eternal damnation. If I misinterpreted, please correct me.)
Belief in "religious" reincarnation (because it can only be believed not known) is not reasonable.In other words it can't be truth.
In short mankind has NOTHING to worry about.Yahoshua said this multiple times but who has listened.Multiple billions throughout history believe(ed) he will torture multiple billions in a literal hell for eternity.That is the complete opposite of the truth.God is "spirit" which means LIFE....to destroy life is impossible for the creator God it goes against their nature.That is the crux of the Good News Yahoshua proclaimed and so did the apostles.EVERYTHING else is religious belief and not true.
If you show me my err then I will change my mind. In this case, he's showed me a new hope for my own case, and the lives of others.
I will say that yes, it has changed the way I think about the 144k theory, but I will also say that the 144k theory still applies, just not the way I had believed before.
I'm not so stuborn to say that my way is right and will always remain. A big reason I'm open to discussion is to understand. Someone might have an answer I'm looking for. My mind is made up unless someone explains it to me another way that changes it or shows me something that will counter it.
This was a perfect example.