It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
FriedBabelBroccoli
Ancient Champion
I don't know why everyone is arguing about this being as ALL religion is made up by man and not by some god, gods, lord god. Religions were created by Kings and Queens of the old times as a tool of control over the peasants and slaves.
Hey, I see you have devised an extremely original response to this thread.
How effective has this tactic been for you in the past seeing as these threads pop up weekly here on ATS?
-FBB
Rapha
QueenofSpades
What did Satan do?
He rebelled.
Satan was not evil at all. Just wrongfully slandered by the winner.
So if he is such a mister nice guy, why doesn't this weak cowardly traitor get his banksters to pay peace keepers to dismantle every weapon of mass destruction before WW3 breaks out between the Russians/NATO or China/Japan ?
This will instantly prove that the Bible is a lie.
Like you said, satan is a traitor. In military terms a traitor is killed by firing squad. With immortals, they are thrown into the ultimate endless fire; the Lake of Fire.
So where is the coward Lucifer ? He is a high ranking seraph isn't he ? Lolololol
And he hasn't got the balls to show his face to all mortals.
Ancient Champion
FriedBabelBroccoli
Ancient Champion
I don't know why everyone is arguing about this being as ALL religion is made up by man and not by some god, gods, lord god. Religions were created by Kings and Queens of the old times as a tool of control over the peasants and slaves.
Hey, I see you have devised an extremely original response to this thread.
How effective has this tactic been for you in the past seeing as these threads pop up weekly here on ATS?
-FBB
It hurts to hear the truth doesn't it? You want an effective tactic? Look at your religion.
yuppa
www.churches-of-christ.net...
Follow the link there. it explains about the laws and how they apply to modern christians a bit. Its not hard to find if you look it up but there that might make it easier to go from there.
Ancient Champion
reply to post by FriedBabelBroccoli
It really is hard trying to talk to childern.
Come back when your done fishing.
And why exactly do you trust Rashi to know anything about this business?
And what exactly did their "lesser" gods do when they were lead into the hands of their enemy after sacrificing their children?
reply to post by FriedBabelBroccoli
If you aren't experienced in tech or the sciences you have no authority to be shaming others for what they take on faith. You are mere sheep believing what your professor-pastor tells you to believe is true.
ReturnofTheSonOfNothing
yuppa
www.churches-of-christ.net...
Follow the link there. it explains about the laws and how they apply to modern christians a bit. Its not hard to find if you look it up but there that might make it easier to go from there.
Okay, but it reeks of selection - no matter who is doing the selecting. It's not you actually doing the picking and choosing, I get that.
Regardless of "the law" which you are bound to, what is your opinion of the Old Testament and how do you reconcile the disparate morality of God between the two?
Ancient Champion
reply to post by FriedBabelBroccoli
If it makes you feel better in believing in a religion that created by men that heard voices in their head then by all means go ahead, but this is ATS and not your church don't try to silence me. I could care less if people follow a religion in which people talked to burning bushes and voices in their head but i will give my opinion when i please.
yuppa
As for the disparate morality. Is it fair to expect the same level of respect from people to people? No because they might have diifrent circumstances.
ReturnofTheSonOfNothing
reply to post by FriedBabelBroccoli
If you aren't experienced in tech or the sciences you have no authority to be shaming others for what they take on faith. You are mere sheep believing what your professor-pastor tells you to believe is true.
The tired old "Science requires just as much faith" schtick.
Truth be told, they are in no way equivalent.
Scientific theories are based on repeated observable and empirically measured evidence. Such observable evidence does not require faith to believe in.
I do not need faith to put some degree of confidence in the wave/particle duality of light, because I have done the experiments. A lot of people do this simple experiment in first year physics class.
Nevertheless, I do not believe it 'absolutely' and without question.
Furthermore, scientific theories offer testable predictions, the ability to be proved wrong (falsifiability) and are generally well corroborated by both evidence and with repeated testing.
Because they are evidence based they do not require faith, as faith by definition is believing in something without evidence. Scientific theories are not believed without question either - they are always considered provisional.
When it comes to hypothesies like abiogenesis or the big bang, the truth is we do not say with absolute certainty that they are correct or true. The idea of a big bang does have evidence which supports it, which is more than can be said for the creation myths of world religions.
Personally, and I think with many people, I assign a level of 'confidence' to any claim. If it has demonstrated widespread peer review and academic acceptance, I might regard it as 'likely true' or 'trustworthy' without having reviewed the observed evidence first-hand. I will of course review this level of trust if evidence arises that directly challenges or falsifies a theory. This not remotely similar to regarding it as'absolutely true' regardless of the evidence as religious people regard their gods.
At the end of the day, it's just a label anyway. Fundies love to use it because they think there is some equivalency there, but like most things they come out with, it's just complete nonsense.edit on RAmerica/Chicago31uMon, 17 Mar 2014 00:01:53 -05003-0500fCDT12 by ReturnofTheSonOfNothing because: Typos..... typos everywhere.
ReturnofTheSonOfNothing
reply to post by FriedBabelBroccoli
You can continue to insist that religion is beyond criticism unless one has a doctorate in cosmology or applied physics, but I don't think anyone here actually believes that.
You never know, though, I could be wrong. This is after all ATS...
Full Definition of FAITH
1
a : allegiance to duty or a person : loyalty
b (1) : fidelity to one's promises (2) : sincerity of intentions
2
a (1) : belief and trust in and loyalty to God (2) : belief in the traditional doctrines of a religion
b (1) : firm belief in something for which there is no proof (2) : complete trust
3
: something that is believed especially with strong conviction; especially : a system of religious beliefs
— on faith
: without question took everything he said on faith