It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And since a white 777 with MALAYSIA in 12 foot blue letters would be noticed, that leaves military facilities.
Monte-Carlo
That is absolutely insane if the plane was hijacked and flown to an other country !
Pulling this off with success in this day and age is more than mind-boggling.
Furthermore, taking care of the 240 hostages is no easy task....
roadgravel
reply to post by Hmmmmmmm
And since a white 777 with MALAYSIA in 12 foot blue letters would be noticed, that leaves military facilities.
Not to mention showing up near a commercial airport with no transponder or some bogus code and mentioning that you would like to land your 777.
I also think a do-it-yourself runway isn't an option if the plane is expected to stay undamaged.
Wonder if there is some special cargo the authorities do not want to mention.
The story of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 is a mystery for sure, but information is now starting to emerge that allows us to join some of the dots.
We know the aeroplane was fitted with a satellite system that enabled it to pass information to the ground during its journey.
This system, called "Classic Aero" and operated by London's big satellite telecommunications company Inmarsat, can transmit a range of data, even voice calls.
In its official statement, all Inmarsat will say is that it did indeed receive signals over its network from the plane, and that these were automated "pings".
All this has been shared with the Malaysian authorities.
What my sources tell me is that flight MH370 continued to ping for at least five hours after the aircraft left Malaysian airspace.
There is simply no way such a signal can be sent unless a plane is intact and powered.
Automated pings are essentially just an "I'm live" message.
Nonetheless, their receipt alone should make it possible to work out not just an approximate position for the aircraft at the time of transmission, but also an altitude.
All this may explain why the Americans have now suggested the search should be extended to the Indian Ocean.
~Lucidity
From Reuters...
You know, there's been a lot of speculation about someone maybe taking this jet for nefarious or selfish purposes. But I got to thinking that if they wanted to do this, they probably really wouldn't have taken it with all those people on board knowing that it would garner this much attention (unless of course attention is what they were seeking, but this doesn't seem to be the case). A more likely and much easier way would be to hijack/steal a on-passenger plane.
This makes me think it was a military or weapons testing op gone wrong or the target was someone on that plane and/or their knowledge of something. The laser-from-satellite testing or the cloaking device testing or going off at the wrong time or alien theories are still in play for me too though.edit on 3/15/2014 by ~Lucidity because: (no reason given)
Jonah Fisher
BBC News, Kuala Lumpur
For days the Malaysian authorities refused to confirm or deny the many rumours surrounding the fate of flight MH370.
They insisted that they were waiting to verify information before going public with anything. Those desperate for answers, not least the relatives of the passengers, complained that they must be hiding something.
Now, perhaps stung by criticism from China, Malaysia's PM has put what feels like close to everything on the table.
In a surprisingly open statement he explained what the investigators now believe is true, and the huge uncertainties that remain.
It is what many wish had been done from the start.
For many the idea that the plane might have crossed a large part of Asian airspace unnoticed is far-fetched.
But for now it seems to be the main theory being pursued.
~Lucidity
reply to post by theabsolutetruth
So the satellite does the pinging and finds the plane and says, yes they're still there when the plane pings back? Got it. So they would have triangulation data available then. Thanks.
Arbitrageur
How do you tell the difference between a 777-300 and a 777-2H6-ER? The latter is the model missing, the former is listed here:
Jennyfrenzy
Hijacking
The official said a deliberate takeover of the plane was no longer a theory. "It is conclusive," he said, indicating that investigators were ruling out mechanical failure or pilot error in the disappearance
vietnam.craigslist.org...
Can anyone tell them apart?