It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by notsoperfect
reply to post by Morgil
You need to calm down and look at the facts, no-one is warmongering, merely pointing out facts and citing them with sources.
So in your mind War is good. Is that what you are saying? War is still good even if you have to sign up for the draft for the very war?
This is not a video game you are talking about. Imagine your own life is in line as well as that of the millions of other lives.
The point is very simple.
NK did not attack SK first for no reason. And SK did not even deny it.
What else information do you need to have an informative opinion?
Here you contradict yourself, with all due respect. If Russia supports China with logistics, you just nailed their biggest problem (according to your opinion). If Russia (that is "only" Russia) supports China in a military conflict, the US is pretty much screwed, or at least, is in for a very fair and hard fight.
Originally posted by infinite
However, South Koreans are not best pleased with the limited response from their government and a small minority are literally calling for an aggressive response. Immediately.
reply to post by Morgil
NK has been posturing and flexing it's proverbial muscles for years and if you can't see that then you need to go do some research.
Originally posted by MikeboydUS
reply to post by Tifozi
The Soviets performed well due to a number of factors in WW2. Germany's bad planning, Stalin's ruthlessness, Soviet manufacturing outside the range of German bombers, Germany lacking long range bombers, allied aid to the USSR, and the fact they were defending their motherland.
Originally posted by notsoperfect
This type of words are used only when you want to be very aggressive and belittle the subject.
It is not very conducive for a mutually respective polite discussion.
reply to post by woogleuk
Others governments may not want war, but don't want to fall in line with the rest of the world, and choose war as the only means to get their needs across.
The EP3 aircraft are equipped with advanced radar and other devices to gather electronic information emitted from military facilities.
The EP3 is able to intercept radio signals transmitted between military units, communications between aircraft and control towers, and radar waves emitted by weapons systems.
Japan currently deploys five EP3 aircraft at its Iwakuni Base in Yamaguchi Prefecture, western Japan.
The aircraft routinely patrol the skies over Japan and surrounding areas, monitoring North Korea's military activities, such as a ballistic missile launches.
The Defense Ministry appears to be increasing the number of EP3 flights to be on the alert for further possible military actions by the North.
Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:25:00 +0900(JST)
Originally posted by woogleuk
This post is directed at notsoperfect, it’s off topic, but I'm hoping the mods will understand that I am just trying to relieve the tension.
Notsoperfect, 95.78% of the people on ATS are real human beings, people who are sick of war, sick of governments lying to us, sick of the entire BS that goes on in the world that we, as people, are expected to lap up and move on.
Now, assuming you’re not trolling, and your thoughts are exactly how you feel........Governments are made up of of a few individuals who think they know what is best for us. Some world governments may want peace, others may want war.
Others governments may not want war, but don't want to fall in line with the rest of the world, and choose war as the only means to get their needs across.
It's wrong, I want to live in a world where mankind gets along, regardless of religion, colour or whatever else provokes war, but the sad truth is, it’s not going to happen in our lifetime.
The west seems to think our ideas are the best for the world, and for the most part, I agree, but it wants to remain the greatest power, so won’t allow smaller nations to become greater (in regards to nuclear).
The point is, don't attack your fellow ATS'ers who are some of (for the most part) the true human beings out there, they don't want war, they want the truth.edit on 26/11/10 by woogleuk because: (no reason given)
reply to post by Morgil
The major difference is that the other nuclear powers are democracies and have various layers of safeguards against nuclear war and war in general. They must go through parliament or senates.
Originally posted by notsoperfect
reply to post by Morgil
The major difference is that the other nuclear powers are democracies and have various layers of safeguards against nuclear war and war in general. They must go through parliament or senates.
Well, the only one who can push the button of the nulcear weapn is Obama in the US. But does he have to have the parliamentry process to push the button?
Is that what you are saying?
Eventually it comes down to one person at the top.
Your presumption is that the one at the top of NK is stupid enough to destroy his own people.
Where did you get that?
reply to post by Morgil
The firing of nuclear weapons requires the authorization of the president before they can proceed, but he is unable to launch on his own, not without the concurrence of a cabinet level official to verify his codes.