It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

the real Stargate-SG1

page: 13
2
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 10 2005 @ 01:20 PM
link   
Well maybe there is, maybe there isnt. But if not, lets just build our own! that way we'd eventually BECOME the ancients we love soo much


www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Oct, 10 2005 @ 02:19 PM
link   
Interesting to note that real senior air-force staff have actually appeared in SG-1 as themselves:


Richard Dean Anderson Of STARGATE SG-1 Honored By Air Force

Actor and executive producer Richard Dean Anderson of Stargate SG-1 was recognized at the Air Force Association's 57th Annual Air Force Anniversary Dinner in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, September 14, 2004. Air Force Chief of Staff, General John P. Jumper, will be on hand to participate in the special recognition.

Richard Dean Anderson was recognized for his role as Executive Producer and star of the television show Stargate SG-1, and for the show's continuous positive depiction of the Air Force. Stargate SG-1 continues to be the number one show on the Sci-Fi Channel and is currently in its eighth season on the air. It is also exceedingly popular abroad, distributed by MGM Worldwide Television Group to over 100 countries around the world.

Anderson has portrayed Air Force Colonel Jonathan "Jack" O'Neill, commanding officer of the SG-1 team of explorers, for seven seasons and, this season, has been promoted to Brigadier General and Commander of Stargate Command. Stargate Command is located deep inside Cheyenne Mountain, and most of the supporting casts portraying military members on the show are Air Force.

General Jumper filmed a cameo appearance for the show in August 2003. The episode was the finale of the seventh season, titled "Lost City Part 2", and aired this past March. Gen. Jumper is the second Air Force Chief of Staff to appear on the show. Former Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Michael Ryan also had a cameo role in a fourth season episode titled "Prodigy" which aired in 2000.

In addition to receiving his award from the Air Force Association, Anderson will tour the Pentagon and visit with wounded troops at Walter Reed Hospital


www.mgmscifinews.com.../story8.xml

I'm watching Lost City - 2 again now on Sky1, seeing his name in the cast list playing himself (General John Jumper) prompted me to post this.

Also interesting that some of the support 'actors' are real airforce staff.

[edit on 10-10-2005 by AgentSmith]



posted on Oct, 10 2005 @ 02:26 PM
link   
Yeah thats what I meant endorsed. Its all the same....Desensitizing! Man thats a hard word to spell!



posted on Oct, 10 2005 @ 04:38 PM
link   
Well....in a perfect world hes there to keep the real stargate a secret....

But sadly most likely no, if you think realistically, hes the executive producer, hes just there to sort out all the realism and authenticity.

Ah well.



posted on Oct, 10 2005 @ 04:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by Shadow88
Well....in a perfect world hes there to keep the real stargate a secret....

But sadly most likely no, if you think realistically, hes the executive producer, hes just there to sort out all the realism and authenticity.

Ah well.


Nothing to do with Anderson, the key point I was making was that two Air Force chief of staff have played themselves in the series and a lot of the 'background' Air Force personnel are real.
Though saying that, as much as I want it to be becasue they are hiding something - it can be easily explained as it simply being a good representation of the Air Force in a good light (as they say) and some of the guys being fans pulling strings because of who they are - even if they happen to be the chief of staff.

Though you could also ask why so much attention and devotion to this particular series.... but who knows!

[edit on 10-10-2005 by AgentSmith]



posted on Oct, 11 2005 @ 01:42 PM
link   
Say we did build our own, How would that do anything? We'd have to build two! Transport one on a boeing x3 whatever to the moon. At the moon we place the stargate down and build up a base complex around it including a runway. We now have instantaneous transport from here to the moon. We build another gate on the lunar base, transport it in a ship to Mars or wherever and repeat the process. Here on Earth they could replace airplanes. Who wants a 24 hour flight when you could take two steps and be on the other side of the planet.....or beyond?



posted on Oct, 12 2005 @ 01:29 PM
link   
While the idea of a Stargate is intellectually appealing, the realities are that it is a long way off. Research in Denmark on Quantum Teleportation is still in it's infancy. Currently they're lucky to tranport a single atom, let alone an entire human.

Quantum computing hasn't even become a reality yet. In order to identify where all particles of your body are and where they will be would require computational power orders of magnitude beyond anything on the horizon.

I think it will be a few centuries yet before we could even come clost to Stargate travel



posted on Oct, 12 2005 @ 01:52 PM
link   
THough I like the idea of it being true, I don't think ther is a high chance of it. However is there is a chance, I would not even consider the idea that we managed to develop the technology. I would assume that it would be discovered technology, such as in the Stargate story.



posted on Oct, 12 2005 @ 01:58 PM
link   
The Stargate works by bending space so the distance from one gate to another is very short. This is like Einsteins Unified Field Theory. Gravity, Electricity, Magnetism are all unified, Change one change the other. You manipulate electricity you manipulate gravity.




So what if Einstein did finish his Unified Field Theory but the government won't aknowledge it. They use it to create a Stargate. I think he was working for the NDRC when he was working on his Unified Field theory before he died. the NDRC (Naval Defence Research Comittee) were in charge of the Philadelphia Experiment.



posted on Oct, 12 2005 @ 02:22 PM
link   
BAH!! if anyone caught that, forget what i said, it was a sci fi forum.

There happens to be a whole forum of information dedicated to Time travel and traversable wormholes

[edit on 12-10-2005 by Shadow88]



posted on Oct, 19 2005 @ 03:11 PM
link   
Remember kids, It IS theoretically possible (Dont i sound like sam?) The Naquadha is what keeps the wormhole stable. Lets keep the thread going!



posted on Oct, 19 2005 @ 04:04 PM
link   
Of course the bugger is we dont have naquada do we......sigh......



posted on Oct, 20 2005 @ 11:02 AM
link   
Shadow88, I'm ordering you to start mixing stuff toghether until you come up with naquadha! Or naquadria...whatever floats your boat which is probably naquadria since thats liquid



posted on Oct, 20 2005 @ 04:21 PM
link   
Nah Samantha Carter can du that, i dont need naquadria......kno wata mean?


LOL, but seriously what is naquadria actually supposed to be?



posted on Oct, 22 2005 @ 07:40 AM
link   
Naquadha is the metal the gate is made of. Its the only substance that can hold positevely charged ions or some big word like that...Naqadria is the liquid form



posted on Oct, 29 2005 @ 08:46 AM
link   
Come on people. We are talking about a TV show. Lets get back to the serious stuff. We all have a cup full of real theorys and heresay. Lets all pour our cups into the proverbial bucket and see how we go. Stop this crap about teal'c and naquahdria or whatever the hell it is.
Now.
Firstly. The US is smarter than all this crap we are spinning. I am from the land down under by the way. As if Area 51 is going to be a base for a "real Stargate". Come on. The US gov't put there own country at risk? doubt it. I have it on good Authority that the Pine Gap base in central Australia " which of course is used for "deep space radio", is minimum 18 storeys deep. This from a local Alice Springs tradesman who was escorted to do his job by heavily armed personnel. There are two main perimeters around Pine Gap. The outer is an Australian Police fence, and the inner which is a US controlled fence, by an unknown uniform. Possibly Airforce. Why does it need to be so deep? Area 51 would be used for items that have already been passed as no immediate danger to anyone. I have tried to get into this site personnally and was turned around at the first gate. by armed personnell of course. So I drove around the back way until i reached a sign that said " tresspassers will be shot". I got a few phoros and drove away. Massive round bright white balls. Like giant golf balls. Look it up.

secondly. Has anyone studied a picture of stonehenge. On the boundry of the ground, in one spot ther is a great 3/4 cricle dent in the earth. Looks as though a "stargate-ish" type thing would fit perfectly laying down. Which would make sense if it were on an alter. Very odd.



posted on Oct, 30 2005 @ 03:06 PM
link   
well i spose it does although why would the ancients have a stargate in england as it gets very cold there, especially in the past? A gate would have to be discovered, we do not have the technology to create one (or the nadaquria). we do have antimatter though and that does hold positive electrons... slightly unstable though at the moment. the americans wouldnt like their discoveries to be out of their countries however due to them wanting complete control and secrecy. if the gate was in australia then the australians would have to know there is something there.
gates are theoretically possible though yet the only one other than on earth would be in the next solar system wouldnt it?



posted on Nov, 2 2005 @ 02:40 PM
link   
I think this theory has a lot of plausibility. Granted, I'm not too sure aliens will attack us in 2012, but I think there are some extremely dangerous and advanced ET tech in Iraq that's being called "Weapons Of Mass Destruction." I think Sadaam's nuclear scientist who now lives in the USA and has a book out is just tricking us. I don't think nuclear weapons are the real threat. Hell, many countries have them now.... why are we so worried about Iraq's? What about Korea's? What about the threat of the Chinese? Shouldn't we be building upon our home defense and not throwing our soldiers into some wasteland?

I think it's pretty clear we're going after something that could threaten the world, and it's not nuclear. I find many things interesting about this whole issue.

1. Why has the government stated that John F. Kennedy's assassination information won't be released until 2029? Could this be because Nixon and the previous administrations knew by 2029 we'd either be dead or taken over by a New World Order?

2. Our government isn't dumb enough to declare a war on terror. That's why they're letting the suspicion of a goal of oil, nuclear weapons, or bringing peace to the Middle East take hold.

3. Why would a government put all their money into a war and none into education and health care? Perhaps because the government is intentionally dumbing us down with biased education and making us desperate with a lack of health care so that we can't rationalize or understand that we're entering a possible galactic war.

4. I also find it interesting that Bush would pass a bill that forces all children to be subjected to mental tests in order to get into school. Think about it, if the president said to a parent that their kid has a severe mental disorder and needs meds in order to survive, what's the parent going to say? With that said, the government could easily lace these meds with numbing or controlling drugs.

5. Lastly, I think that, whether there are aliens or not, there will be a draft to continue this war. Perhaps the gov is drugging and dumbing down our working force so that we will be perfect soldiers for war? Then all of our important jobs can be off shored to intelligent indian and asian people.

It sounds very plausible to me. I have no doubt that this world will survive whatever happens in the future, but I fear for our generation.



posted on Nov, 2 2005 @ 03:27 PM
link   
Brazil has a dictator
China has suffered for decades from communism
Korea, Palistine, Iran, Afganistan and loads more also have or are under the suspicion of having WMD's.

France has nukes. England has one (
LOL i think thats so funny! we have A nuclear device.) "darling, be a dear and bring me my tracksuit, im off to polish the nuke and put it in the garage. We took it camping and its looking a little scruffy."

America has like a bjillion more than the rest of the world combined LOL. which is why we should and at the same time shouldnt rise up against america.


My point is i doubt it was the only reason. A side reason or an an excuse, but not the only reason. it was daft. i just think, well what about everyone else with nukes and the willingness to use them!? why just iraq?!!! (I really really hope it was a stargate. Will save me the trouble! Building a stargate



posted on Nov, 2 2005 @ 03:50 PM
link   
as much as i love the show and watch it religiously, and as much as i would love to believe that its based on fact, the big question remains unanswered:

if there is, indeed, a stargate program being run by the US airforce, why in the hell are we spending so much time killing each other here on earth? why not just make it public knowledge, and let the chips fall where they may? true, there might be some initial non-believing riots, but once proven it would have to bring us closer together as fellow members of the human race on earth. especially if there is some evil race intent on our distruction or subjugation as a species.

our leaders may be stupid, but they aint dumb. if stargates do exist, there is no real reason for the wars currently being fought.....its a waste of time, money, and lives. therefore, it cant be real.



new topics

top topics



 
2
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join