It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: lovebeck
a reply to: CardiffGiant
This is the local Fox affiliate in Cleveland's live stream:
Fox 8
COSTELLO: Mary, do you envision a time in the near future, maybe if we see another Ebola case, let's say in Boston or some other city in the United States, that the travel ban, or at least a partial ban, might be implemented?
MARY SCHIAVO, CNN AVIATION ANALYST: Well, absolutely. And it's just a matter of common sense. We see people in moon suits telling us not to worry and fly the world. But what they don't understand is the nature of an aircraft. And let me draw a parallel to the ambulance in Texas. The ambulance in Texas took this gentleman to the hospital who has Ebola. The ambulance is then taken out of service and they are scrubbing the school where these five little children went, in moon suits, to take any precautions. You cannot do that to an aircraft. An aircraft is a $350 million flying computer, and there's no way to disinfect the seats, there's no way to disinfect the bathrooms and you're forgetting about the people who work in the belly of the plane, who load it, who service it. It is a trajectory through which the virus can be transported and you can't clean it. And that's the problem, an aircraft is not an ambulance, and you just can't do that.
COSTELLO: So what are you suggesting, Mary? Should there be some sort of ban or a partial ban be put into place?
SCHIAVO: Yes. Absolutely, and it should be a ban on the aircraft. We should suspend service to those infected areas. Yes, people can still travel to Brussels and travel to the United States, but it's not possible for us to contain it on the aircraft. You're focusing on the people and I think we need to focus on the actual service providing instruments, the aircraft, the services, the things that go on the aircraft. So, yes, I think a ban is in place and it should have been put in place long ago. Like I said, they're standing there in moon suits telling us it's OK to get on the plane. It's not. No common sense.
originally posted by: Valhall
a reply to: drwill
there aint nobody out there that can "pick" the "gestation" period and call things okie-dokie. Not as far as I'm concerned.
Recent studies conducted in West Africa have demonstrated that 95% of confirmed cases have an incubation period in the range of 1 to 21 days; 98% have an incubation period that falls within the 1 to 42 day interval.
originally posted by: suz62
a reply to: kosmicjack
kosmic, we are powerless to fight. I don't believe enough people will rise up to make a difference.
originally posted by: kosmicjack
And who was she reporting her temperature to? Didn't the CDC say on Sunday morning that they would then be monitoring all of the HCWs...,
originally posted by: suz62
Don't they need fresh tobacco leaves for that? Live plants? How are they going to do that in the fall and winter?
originally posted by: kosmicjack
If she knew she had a fever prior to boarding, that's appalling if not outright criminal, IMHO.
And who was she reporting her temperature to? Didn't the CDC say on Sunday morning that they would then be monitoring all of the HCWs who worked with Duncan, from that point forward? Doesn't that make CDC culpable? Shouldn't they have known if the were "monitoring" her?
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
originally posted by: suz62
a reply to: kosmicjack
kosmic, we are powerless to fight. I don't believe enough people will rise up to make a difference.
We are NOT powerless.
If the government won't stop flights WE can...WE the people who take flights, fly the planes, clean the planes, refuel the planes, handle luggage, take reservations can STOP doing so.
And the people who are risking their lives caring for the ill need to realize this isn't just another picnic in the park and stay isolated as well. The CDC really should have told them that.
BS we're powerless.