Loretta Fuddy Death - Obama Birth Certificate. - New evidence

SBMcG
The FACT is, anyone who opens that 27 April 2011 .pdf with the program in which it was constructed -- Adobe Illustrator -- will almost instantly know it's fake.

Well, they should offer their services as an "expert" to birthers. They have been unable to find a real expert that can show that in court!

reply to post by hellobruce

Well, they should offer their services as an "expert" to birthers. They have been unable to find a real expert that can show that in court!

Have they even *Really* tried all that hard?


She could be a shill for the Obama cover-up.
Why else would so many cases be similar and yet so off the mark?
All those "losses" sure put a lot of ideas in peoples' minds now don't they?
I think Orly is a Moldavian agent.

reply to post by Mikeultra


Hello,

The image taken by Savannah Guthrie shows a raised seal. A seal in the same location and size as in the Guthrie photo can be seen in the PDF by adjusting the contrast.

The seals in your previous post are on 1956 and 1966 issued birth certificates. The seal they use today is not as prominent so it will not show up in photo copies or scans. Look for Hawaiian BCs issued recently, they also appear to have no seal.

Virginia Sunahara's birth certificate number is 11080.

The 1961 Polk Directory for Honolulu lists the Dunhams as living at the address listed on President Obama's LFBC.

The layers in the PDF were created during the scanning process by the software used to reduce the file size. The process known as Mixed Raster Content compression creates exactly the type of layers seen in the PDF.

Dr. Neal Krawetz (PhD in computer science) examined the layers in the PDF and said there was nothing suspicious about them. Professor Richardo de Queiroz (one of the developers of Mixed Raster Content compression) examined the PDF and said there was no evidence of manipulation.

reply to post by freakjive


That's not a scuba diver. Those are Director Fuddy's feet and legs. She is wearing dark shoes with light colored soles. If you watch the video in real time you can see her feet come and go down several times. She is on her back and pedaling her feet like on a recumbent bike.

reply to post by freakjive


Here is the video - starting at 3:30 and lasting about ten seconds. You can one of her feet come out of the water and then go underwater and then her other foot comes out and goes back under.

ondemand.abcnews.com...

CEHughes
reply to post by Mikeultra

 

Hello,

The image taken by Savannah Guthrie shows a raised seal. A seal in the same location and size as in the Guthrie photo can be seen in the PDF by adjusting the contrast.

The seals in your previous post are on 1956 and 1966 issued birth certificates. The seal they use today is not as prominent so it will not show up in photo copies or scans. Look for Hawaiian BCs issued recently, they also appear to have no seal.

Virginia Sunahara's birth certificate number is 11080.

The 1961 Polk Directory for Honolulu lists the Dunhams as living at the address listed on President Obama's LFBC.

The layers in the PDF were created during the scanning process by the software used to reduce the file size. The process known as Mixed Raster Content compression creates exactly the type of layers seen in the PDF.

Dr. Neal Krawetz (PhD in computer science) examined the layers in the PDF and said there was nothing suspicious about them. Professor Richardo de Queiroz (one of the developers of Mixed Raster Content compression) examined the PDF and said there was no evidence of manipulation.

Hello,
Thank you for pointing that out to me. I think I see some anomaly which could possibly be an embossed seal. I don't have Adobe Illustrator, so I zoomed in real close at the pdf forgery and took a screen capture of what I believe you refer to. Here I have it circled in red.

I will no longer claim that there is not an embossed seal. However I think it's likely Loretta Fuddy provided Barry's personal courier a blank green basket weave security paper certificate with the embossed seal for his forgers to work with. Loretta probably also provided the Nordyke twins certificates to pull certain pieces to add to the forgery. She was also responsible for providing the Virginia Surahara certificate # 151 10641 to use in the fraud. The forgery is not a copy of the original long form birth certificate. There is no statement on the bottom of the form saying that it is with an actual signature. It only has a bogus rubber stamp impression. This one is a true copy of an original.

Or this one.

The Barry certificate of live birth is a computer generated forgery, possibly having an embossed raised seal provided by Loretta Fuddy!
If it was a true copy of the original it would look like the Nordyke certificate. When I had to get a copy of my original long form, it was not printed on this new green basket weave paper. That new paper was used by the forger because Barry doesn't have an original long form certificate in Hawaii's vault to make a true copy from.

reply to post by Mikeultra


The 1956 and 1966 BCs were created using a photostatic copier which produces a negative image (black background/white lettering). They stopped using this process in the 1970s. Today they copy directly onto green security paper. They also changed the format for the signatures. They now use rubber stamped signatures.

This 1962 BC was reissued in 1984 (note the new format):

passportsusa.com...

The reverse side (note the rubber stamp signature):

passportsusa.com...

CEHughes
reply to post by Mikeultra

 

The 1956 and 1966 BCs were created using a photostatic copier which produces a negative image (black background/white lettering). They stopped using this process in the 1970s. Today they copy directly onto green security paper. They also changed the format for the signatures. They now use rubber stamped signatures.

This 1962 BC was reissued in 1984 (note the new format):

passportsusa.com...

The reverse side (note the rubber stamp signature):

passportsusa.com...

OK, thanks for showing me that. I have a question though about the state registar rubber stamps. If a person wants a copy of their original long form birth certificate, shouldn't it be an actual copy bearing the signature of the state registar at the time of the requesting persons birth? I see that the local registar signature, Verna K. Lee is the same as Barry's certificate. But the state registar signature appears to be that of the person who had that job in 1984. If they stopped doing the actual copying in the 1970's, that coincides with the East West Center opening up 10 years earlier and having the need to provide the communists coming to Hawaii with identities so they can infiltrate the U.S. Just a possibility... that might be the reason they switched over from the old way.

I found an alien registration card #A11938537 for Barry's "father", Barack Hussein Obama. On it is his birth date June 18, 1934.

Here is a simple math problem that the forger of Barry's fake birth certificate made a mistake on. In box 10 the fathers age is entered as 25. If Barry's daddy was born on June 18, 1934 his age would be 27 on the birth date of his "son" on August 04,1961.

reply to post by Mikeultra


The short answer is no, a certified copy of a birth certificate created today will not have the signature of the registrar from the time period when the birth occurred.

The original 1961 document in the DOH offices does not have the registrar signature (Dr. Charles Bennett) on it, only the local registrar (Verna Lee's signature). The registrar only signed it when creating a certified copy. Look at the 1956 BC (BTW, there is an error in the dates that the mother and doctor signed the document) the birth occurred in January, 1956 but the certified copy wasn't created until August, 1956. For the 1961 Nordyke BC, she was born August, 1961 but the registrar signed it in May, 1966. Had there been a change in registrars between 1961 and 1966, there would be a different signature on the certified copy.

The birth certificate given to the parents is not the entire document. There is medical information on the BC that is never given to the parents. We can get a hint of this by zooming in on the President's LFBC, just to the left of box 7d, you can make out a pre-printed "?". This is part of the medical information. Dr. Bennett wrote an article in 1955 about Hawaiian vital records. In it, he described how the BCs are filled out;

"A nurse or clerk in the hospital fills in the certificate form and gets the mother to sign it. Then the attending physician enters certain medical data and affixes his signature. Finally, the hospital sends the completed certificate to the local registrar."

www.wnd.com...

If we look at the Nordyke sisters' BCs, we can see that they look like a composit image. The signatures of Dr. Bennett and Dr. Bernstein are on a separate piece of paper that was placed on the photostat's platen and the bound volume with the BC was placed over it. There is a white line the looks like overexposure between where the signatures are and where the BC info begins.

the.honoluluadvertiser.com...

reply to post by Mikeultra


There are two copies of Barak Obama Sr.'s passports. One from 1959 lists the DOB as 1934 and his 1964 passport lists the DOB as 1936. There are in fact several documents in his immigration file that list 1936 as his DOB.

And of course there is his headstone:

www.theobamafile.com...

CEHughes
reply to post by Mikeultra

 

There are two copies of Barak Obama Sr.'s passports. One from 1959 lists the DOB as 1934 and his 1964 passport lists the DOB as 1936. There are in fact several documents in his immigration file that list 1936 as his DOB.

And of course there is his headstone:

www.theobamafile.com...

That would make him a liar then. Apples don't fall far from the tree. Where is his original birth certificate? After 1964 he claimed he was born in 1936? The date on the bottom of this alien registration card is September 26, 1962 and says he's at Harvard University in Massachussetts. What date did he take off and flee Hawaii after Barry was born? Do you have any images of those other documents with a 1936 birth date on them. Headstones are known for having mistakes on them.

Here is a street view from Google Earth of 1482 Alencastre Street Honolulu, Hawaii. the address on his alien registration card. It looks like a garage, the house is behind it down the hill.

reply to post by Mikeultra


Look through these:

www.scribd.com...

He got a BA from the Univ. of Hawaii in June, 1962.

CEHughes
reply to post by Mikeultra

 

Look through these:

www.scribd.com...

He got a BA from the Univ. of Hawaii in June, 1962.

edit on 4-3-2014 by CEHughes because: add info

Excellent find! Thanks a lot. I'm only on page 13 of 55 and he seems to be quite a snake from what I've read so far.

Page 15 of 55 is priceless! I can only imagine the gold mine of hidden information about Barry that would cause me to laugh hysterically, and then probably get sick. Daddy Obama doesn't seem like the sharpest individual at Harvard. One might be tempted to refer to him as a village idiot! On this alien registration card he writes his address as being Economics Dept. Harvard University, Cambridge 38, Mass.
Did he roll out a mat and sleep there?

Page 15 states that Harvard is not at all impressed with him and is trying to figure out how to get rid of him! They also can't figure out how many wives he has. Thanks go to C E Hughes for the information at this link. www.scribd.com...

Now the next image shows daddy Obama trying to extend his stay. He gets off to a bad start on Line 1 mixing up his 1st and last name. Line 4 he lies about his birth date being June 18, 1936 after previously declaring it to be June 18, 1934. Line 7 he says he's married and lists 2 wives, but separated from 1 of them 2 months ago. That wife must have been Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soeorto Subud Soebarkah.
Line 9 he states that "I HAVE NOT" been employed, but then follows up with his employer being Harvard and his employment consists of "part time research". Salary is $1500.00 per year. This guy was an idiot! No wonder Harvard had enough of him! This form was filled out April 21, 1964 so that means he "separated" from Ann approximately February 21, 1964 if he's not lying.

reply to post by Mikeultra




gotta luvit !!

reply to post by Mikeultra


I just joined here after a friend pointed out that this video was being discussed here. I am butterdezillion, the original poster of the youtube video that slowed down the frames of the ABC footage. I'm glad to see you guys looking at the whole ABC videos; there's a bunch more stuff in there. I've created a new youtube that points out some of the other stuff. It's at www.youtube.com... I don't know how to post a new post here, or how to get this out where people will see it. I was hoping somebody could help me with that. Any help you can give would be appreciated.

Thanks!
Nellie

PS. And I don't know how this site works. Are there notifications when somebody posts to me? Mikeultra, I agree that the witnesses need to be deposed. It is clear that they were watching and knew a lot more was going on than they have been willing to say. This new youtube shows that clearly, as well as showing the editing by ABC, who I believe also had to know what they were covering up.

butterdezillion
reply to post by Mikeultra

 

I just joined here after a friend pointed out that this video was being discussed here. I am butterdezillion, the original poster of the youtube video that slowed down the frames of the ABC footage. I'm glad to see you guys looking at the whole ABC videos; there's a bunch more stuff in there. I've created a new youtube that points out some of the other stuff. It's at www.youtube.com... I don't know how to post a new post here, or how to get this out where people will see it. I was hoping somebody could help me with that. Any help you can give would be appreciated.

Thanks!
Nellie

PS. And I don't know how this site works. Are there notifications when somebody posts to me? Mikeultra, I agree that the witnesses need to be deposed. It is clear that they were watching and knew a lot more was going on than they have been willing to say. This new youtube shows that clearly, as well as showing the editing by ABC, who I believe also had to know what they were covering up.

Hello butterdezillion,
Welcome to ATS! There is a private message function on this site, but you have to make at least 20 posts before you can make or receive private messages from other members. I have information that I would like to share with you regarding this incident, which has been not discussed here. Well it was but was removed. Please make your 20 posts anywhere in the forum so I can private message you! Maybe we can communicate outside this forum. Make them in this thread as long as they're related to Loretta Fuddy and not too revealing about personal information. That's against terms and conditions of use.