ROMANEK BUSTED!- Stan Caught Red Handed FAKING-HOAXING - New Development

Brotherman

Jobeycool
The truth and 100 % fact is everyone is speculating about Mr. Romanek .We don't know if this man is honest or trustworthy and we don't know if this is a giant hoax.
Now you pile on factual reports of child pornography charges and He might go to jail over it and the idea that people in our government can sit on a computer and plant child pornography on your computer for anything is frightening.It remains a BIG IF for me that Romanek is truthful anyways.This is unimagineable dangerous stuff if this kind of stuff is going on with aliens beings and a huge cover up of some sort.Maybe they are demonic beings that have something to do with the End Times and the Anti-Christ,because I think they are real even if Stan Romanek is a hoaxer and liar.

edit on 22-2-2014 by Jobeycool because: (no reason given)

I think its a big IF, if your actually old enough to buy smokes or drive past midnight. I think you want to believe that bad it makes you a moron when on a subject defending a liar and a kook.

There is no way either one of us knows if ths man is a hoaxer or a liar sitting on a computer.

Well, regarding Luke Rudkowski and the supposed 'embezzlement' charges:

Rational Wiki is not only NOT rational, it's an obvious hitman site. Gawd, I hate it when I run across crap like this and someone else actually puts it out there as reasonable information. Can't you tell ANYTHING from the contorted phrasing? It's as if one of The Amaaaaazzzinggg Randi's students got all hot and bothered about the world and started writing from their comfy basement apartments.

irrational wiki CIA crap

Here ATS peoples, look what they say about you:

more irrational crap website

reply to post by signalfire


And... ? Looks pretty spot on to me..

signalfire
Well, regarding Luke Rudkowski and the supposed 'embezzlement' charges:

Rational Wiki is not only NOT rational, it's an obvious hitman site. Gawd, I hate it when I run across crap like this and someone else actually puts it out there as reasonable information. Can't you tell ANYTHING from the contorted phrasing? It's as if one of The Amaaaaazzzinggg Randi's students got all hot and bothered about the world and started writing from their comfy basement apartments.

irrational wiki CIA crap

Here ATS peoples, look what they say about you:

more irrational crap website

edit on 360782pmSundayf07Sun, 23 Feb 2014 20:07:36 -0600America/Chicago by signalfire because: (no reason given)

Unfortunately, and I hate to say it, they hit ATS on the head, we are all here for conspiracies and the like, and some of the threads ARE a little out there as far as rationality goes, doesn't mean I love the site any less, just helps to know that we are what we are, conspiracy theory junkies ^_^

As for Rudkowski, there are about 10,000+ links about his embezzlement stuff, and all RW did was put it in a small and concise form as a lot of the sites are dripping with anger and venom at the man for what he did.

Next you're going to try and say that ATS is NOT a conspiracy site?

rupertg
It doesn't look good. The police found over 300 pictures.In 2009 he was also downloading and sharing child porn. I'm not sure why they didn't catch him then.

Here is more news hot off the press on this pedofile. It includes his mug shot and police report scan:

www.reporterherald.com...
www.huffingtonpost.com...

He is scheduled for a preliminary hearing at 1:30 p.m. on March 18.

Wow..unreal if this is all true.Not good at all.

As soon as I read about Stan's arrest I knew it was a setup! The breaches they've had on their computer is unreal and well documented for years. When people are caught with childporn on their computers they don't have 20 images they have thousands! Thousands! But 20 is a small enough package to neatly hide it on someone's computer where they wouldn't even check. I'm sure I've never thought I wonder if there's childporn images in my computer and gone looking! What better way to get Stan away from spreading his story than being able to stop him using the Internet and to discredit him in one foul swoop? Pathetic. Those who believe in Stan's story will recognise this for what it is.

I love how, any site that presents both sides of the argument is a conspiracy site whereas, a site that is closely edited to be on a particular message and jealously guarded from any other version of the "facts", is a balanced view. Klass, a proven liar and yet, still hero worshipped by those who claim to hold balanced views, the very same people who squeak like a bus outing form Canoga Park to the set of the latest blockbuster Romcom at the slightest indiscretion by those they disagree with.

There are two main conspiracies within Ufology. The conspiracy to make as much cash from the subject as possible and the utter bovine waste many governments and their agencies dish out about various weird incidents. For 100 years, conspiracies were everywhere and often promoted as "fact" by exactly the same sort of people who now say "nothing to see here, move on". With the collapse of the communist block as any sort of viable alternative to the mighty whiff of cash conspiracies were meant to do the honourable thing and simply go away. Only they didn't, they helped create the beast the explosion of the, net simply fuelled it and as usual, those who see themselves as the guardians of the "truth" were left standing in the blocks bleating "no-ones interested in the truth because it's boring".

Well, problem is, when it comes to UFOs, the "truth" is anything bar boring. It might not be what anyone wants or wishes for however, anyone who seriously studies the subject and doesn't just snipe from the comfort of the ignorance sidelines knows that. There is a very seemingly real phenomenon that might stem from our own psyches and is made manifest to the extent it appears utterly real to those observing it.On the other hand it might well be another as yet unknown intelligence's way of interacting with the Earth's resident primates. It might all be misidentified black ops although that one has no more credible evidence than the idea it's aliens as, for it to be true, they've been flying craft that could have won both world wars in a weeks, for over 100 years.

To pretend that Ufology has no merit or scientific worthiness, is in itself a huge conspiracy only, the people doing the conspiring wish you to think otherwise so they seek to tar Ufology with the same brush as those who truly postulate some nutcase scenarios. I have spoken to more than one scientist who has said. "I'm fascinated by the subject of Ufology although, I'll deny that should you ever say I am in public as it would see the end of my career". For them to say that means that, either they are utterly paranoid or someone, has been conspiring to make it plain that's what will happen should they poke their head over the parapet. Given we know for a fact that the likes of Klass did exactly that and attempted to have people fired or removed from the jobs for their interest in Ufology, I know which side of that equation I think is the more credible.

Disgusting facsimile of a human being. Barely human psychopath. Hoping it gets the death penalty. No contribution to humanity, should be destroyed like the trash it is. Weird mockery of a human, running around trying to talk, obviously owned by insanity.

Idiots who worshiped the thing's lies should be whipped in public.

reply to post by ZeroGhost

Thank you for a fair and honest post as there are very few on ats anymore, I love the debunkers "it's fake because I say so"
right!...No one can see his hand so by not seeing his hand how exactly does one come to the conclusion he flicked it? his hand is not visible.
Talk about denying ignorance!

originally posted by: TWILITE22
reply to post by ZeroGhost

 

Thank you for a fair and honest post as there are very few on ats anymore, I love the debunkers "it's fake because I say so"
right!...No one can see his hand so by not seeing his hand how exactly does one come to the conclusion he flicked it? his hand is not visible.
Talk about denying ignorance!

It was a truly childish display. If you want to buy into that sort of crap, that's your prerogative.

a reply to: CigaretteMan

This is sick and obnoxious

a reply to: Xcathdra
"COME ON PEOPLE, THIS HAS BEEN HAPPENING TO ABDUCTEES WHO WON'T KEEP QUIET FOR DECADES!" They just found the best way to discredit him. You hear "child porn" & you immediately hate that person. It's the perfect way to discredit anyone!
First off "he was warned this exact thing would happen!". He & I talked about this nearly 4 years ago. He said, "I'd rather them just kill me, but I'm not gonna shut up!" The video was done on purpose. Stan was told if he'd discredited himself, they'd dismiss the charges. He hasnt put out half of the ET evidence he has. Basically when speaking or writing books you barely make any money. The last documentary "Extraordinary" was put out by a company where he gave them all rights. (He didn't make one dime!... I've known Stan & Lisa a long time & been to their home. That's not who he is. He never asked for any of this to happen!! Think of the kindest person you know, then have them be charged with child porn, you'd feel a bit different too wouldn't you! It's the perfect way for them to discredit him.

a reply to: Brotherman

"Thank for your post my friend"
Stan & Lisa have been my friends for years. My uncle lives about an hour away from him in Colorado.
I'll say again, about 4 years ago he was told "this exact thing would happen if he didn't shut up. After the charges were filed he told me, "I'd rather them have killed me instead" think about it, a charge like "child porn" could make anyone instantly hated, so the government's plan worked. About this bogus video, he was told if he'd discrete himself, they'd make the charges dissappear. So, he did it & they weren't happy with the way he handled it. What I can say is, I've know him & his wife VERY well for many years & this is total BS.....

Trouble is, some of the kindest people that you know COULD actually be paedophiles.

They don't wear badges or have a certain look or demeanor about them, Neither do they behave in a certain way.

Just because someone is considered nice and friendly means nothing.


It's what happens behind closed doors that really matters.