It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
ChuckNasty
reply to post by DJW001
Nerd talk for pics or it doesn't happen.
Go Google yerself a program and prove to us that you are correct.
See beyond yer HS thinking and enjoy science facts instead of 'I think it does' mentality.
I have two models one heliocentric and the other geocentric.
Both models when watched seem alike from an earth bound view.
Both models account for the reversing orbit of Venus.
The funny thing is the whole universe is moving every star and galaxy is moving their is no stillness in the universe all moves. While there are certain tracks of rotation of our planets they are never exactly the same. This too has been observed and incorporated into the two above models yet we cannot tell which is the correct view.
There is no way to establish a spot from which we could observe in space that we are completely still. If we make that spot a still location comparatively to the Earth or Sun it is all still moving. To some there is no up or down or north or south except if we chose to use our earth's north but even then the north we choose can only be applied to our earth as the earth wobbles to and fro so the North is never pointing exactly the same place in the universe as it moves along in this universe.
We cannot find a completely still spot to observe from because everything is moving and though it may seem we are still compared to our earth we are still not still. Unless we can create a completely still location from which to observe from we will never know if the earth and moon revolves around the sun or the Sun and the other planets revolves around the earth.
If we could get outside the firmament (the encompassing container of the universe and its darkness) and place the whole universe in front of us (we being outside of the encompassing container) then we may be able to finally answer that question. Until then nobody's opinion of heliocentric or geocentric revolution is correct.
Baguul
reply to post by Indigent
Flawed logic friend, as this is not a major topic in conversation. I would be surprised of ALL the people you meet, 1% constitue this subject being broached.
maintainright
"That Earth/sun thing has neither a bearing on our daily lives, nor on our need to make the whole world American.
In the end, what difference does it make if the sun circles the Earth or vice versa?
It's always up there and we're always down here. That's all we really need to know."
One of the most depressing things I've read in a while, just give up buddy, way to inspire!
that "journalist" needs to have his macbook taken off him, smashed, and banned from using pens for life
pathetic drivel
dogstar23
reply to post by Indigent
Anyone who has driven anywhere in the US would be shocked that 75% of people know Earth is a planet, and the sun isn't just "that thar' big honkin' light bulb in the sky", let alone that Earth revolves around the Sun. Personally, I don't know how most people survive through a day.
Please, Natural Selection, come back. We miss you!
Case in point. I'm not sure how this guy makes it but he says the sun obviously isn't that big, only a few miles around.
dogstar23
reply to post by Indigent
Anyone who has driven anywhere in the US would be shocked that 75% of people know Earth is a planet, and the sun isn't just "that thar' big honkin' light bulb in the sky", let alone that Earth revolves around the Sun. Personally, I don't know how most people survive through a day.
I'm no biblical scholar either, but I don't think it says either way, at least not clearly. I think the idea could be based on a misinterpretation of Psalm 104:5 which in King James version says:
bbracken677
I would dare ask him where in the Bible does it say the sun revolves around the earth? I am afraid I have not run across that, not that I am particularly versed or qualified...
[Who] laid the foundations of the earth, [that] it should not be removed for ever.
As Galileo is supposed to have said-- 'Scriptures tell us how to go to heaven, not how the heavens go.
Arbitrageur
I'm no biblical scholar either, but I don't think it says either way, at least not clearly. I think the idea could be based on a misinterpretation of Psalm 104:4 which in King James version says:
bbracken677
I would dare ask him where in the Bible does it say the sun revolves around the earth? I am afraid I have not run across that, not that I am particularly versed or qualified...
www.kingjamesbibleonline.org...
[Who] laid the foundations of the earth, [that] it should not be removed for ever.
Someone might misread that as the Earth doesn't move (implying that everything else must revolve around it), but that's not even what it means...it's saying the Earth won't be destroyed (which by the way in 5 billion years when the sun goes red giant, it might be. All the oceans will boil away long before that).
I found this link Bible Verses About The Earth Orbiting the Sun, but I don't see where the listed verses support that idea, and then there's the whole Catholic church versus Galileo thing, though the Catholic church is not noted for following a strict interpretation of the bible.edit on 16-2-2014 by Arbitrageur because: clarification
ParasuvO
reply to post by Xterrain
Evolving from animals theory is FAR more absurd than most that have hit this planet...
In fact it is flat out disturbing, because we can see flat out in front of our faces that this is not and never COULD be the case.