It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
jmdewey60
reply to post by Greatest I am
We are the ones who ultimately benefit from a reconciliation between God and man.
Strange that an omnipotent all powerful God would corrupt himself for a little love from men.
Left on our own without God, we would all perish forever.
God would have the benefit of knowing that His efforts were not in vain.
jmdewey60
reply to post by Greatest I am
I don't see it as a demand like one person has a higher rank than the other, and gives orders to his subordinate.
Do you think a noble God would demand the death of his son instead of just forgiving us in some moral way?
I think what the New Testament says is that before the incarnation, they were equals in the heavenly council where the proto-Jesus accepted the role as the servant while he lived on earth as a man.
Jesus forgave people, and people around him thought that was outrageous and presumptuous but it was Jesus' ability to read people's hearts and to know that they were truly repentant and were not going to continue their old path of sin.
Jesus didn't have to die first before he could forgive sins.
Forgiveness is not contingent on Jesus' death.
Jesus died to judge the sinful and satanic world system and to show us that as unattractive as he was as a condemned and executed criminal, he was later exalted to the highest state that there is, Lord.
We should take heart in that and hope that we can be accepted by God also even though we may be mired down in this life.
Of course we need to get on with that uplifting through God's power now, and not on the day we die.
edit on 4-2-2014 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by Joecroft
I agree with everything except the implication that God could have intervened at some point to stop the sacrifices but instead decided not to. I don't think God has any intent or will besides our own. His will is our will and that is free will. God is not some outside observer in my opinion, he lives within and experiences through us.
We seem to be on the same wavelength with most things my friend. We may not agree on everything but that's to be expected, we are both on our own path but I don't think they lie too far apart from one another.
Luke 14:26 “If anyone comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple. Whoever does not bear his own cross and come after me cannot be my disciple.
Luke 14:33 So therefore, any one of you who does not renounce all that he has cannot be my disciple.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
I agree with everything except the implication that God could have intervened at some point to stop the sacrifices but instead decided not to.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
We seem to be on the same wavelength with most things my friend. We may not agree on everything but that's to be expected, we are both on our own path but I don't think they lie too far apart from one another.
LittleByLittIe I agree that god is more connected to each soul than we are told in Religion. I think Jesus real sacrifice was not dying at the cross but falling to be born and spend time on earth instead of being where Jesus belongs.
This person to me understand a love/hate relationship of trying to help. while at the same time being annoyed at the lack of progress and the seed not becoming the thing you expected it would if it grew in perfect soil.
LittleByLittle I think above is not only material possessions but ego death (transformation of ego from one state to another) also.
Like a bull god?
If he were real, of course the strong would be man's slave and servant.
According to human thinking, politically, back in older times of pagan temples, you would of course need servants to operate the physical apparatus of the Temple, which would be necessary to draw the god presence down to you and a divine palace suitable for a dwelling of a god, all things that absorb a portion of a people's wealth to maintain.
Do you think a God needs slaves or servants or anything else?
God is a spirit that we do not rule.
Like my apotheosis had the Godhead serving me as teacher, any God worth his title here would come to serve, not to rule. He would be under our law, not us under his.
I don't know what "beliefs" you may be referring to.
"Jesus died to judge the sinful and satanic world system"
Pfft. He created it by your beliefs so he would have to find it perfect.
I think that the universe at large is "defective".
Scriptures do say that all of God's works are perfect so they either stay that way or God made them defective.
Your choice.
Life may seem like a punishment to a lot of people.
Either way, for God to punish us for being the way he created us would be unjust and we would reject his unjust judgement.
Ultimately we are responsible for our own fates, in a long term, group sort of way, but God has added things into the mix to help out with that.
We are the supreme beings here. Not an absentee God.
jmdewey60
reply to post by Greatest I am
Like a bull god?
If he were real, of course the strong would be man's slave and servant.
Make an image of a big bull or an ox and say that is your god?According to human thinking, politically, back in older times of pagan temples, you would of course need servants to operate the physical apparatus of the Temple, which would be necessary to draw the god presence down to you and a divine palace suitable for a dwelling of a god, all things that absorb a portion of a people's wealth to maintain.
Do you think a God needs slaves or servants or anything else?
I think that Jesus was against such a thing and was happy enough to have a meeting hall where believers could gather and praise god with prayer and song and readings from good books on the holy life that we should be following.God is a spirit that we do not rule.
Like my apotheosis had the Godhead serving me as teacher, any God worth his title here would come to serve, not to rule. He would be under our law, not us under his.
A spirit or spiritual being of course could assist you (or anyone else) in a lot of things and it would be part of the greater "god" existence.
mysterioustranger
reply to post by Greatest I am
A scapegoat is someone you "blame" for something. IF they get you into HEAVEN....you'd THANK THEM!
vethumanbeing
You are only experiencing a 'demi god' manifested in the dumb downs or compartmentalizations of the 'absolute unbounded awareness'. This is a digital awareness just trying to organize itself. Demi-gods are further down in the concept material matter organization. Smaller denser compartmentalized units.
I was just trying to figure out what Greatest I Am was talking about.
. . . these Egotistical Idiot God Constructs (not saying they never existed), they as (false Gods suceeded) . . .
jheated5
Simple I plan to sacrifice myself for the life of another... There's my free pass to heaven right there, have you seen the movie "this is the end"?
You are making an oxymoron, that somehow people can be "righteous" while at the same time not actually being good.
There are no good people. They don't exist. There are righteous people, but even they were evil once.
I realize that this is an opinion that some people hold, but how exactly do you personally know that this is what God thinks?
This world is fallen and Satan is the god of this world, according to God.
Which one of these statements are true?
Well, there was that one guy a long time ago - . . .
. . . Since all humans are evil, . . .
But that is not the case then, is it?
That doesn't mean we are redeemed of our own merit, nor by scapegoating. We can not blame Satan for our fall, because we chose to disobey God when we still had full knowledge of the choice and free will.
If mysteriously 100% of people chose that, wouldn't that make you suspect that perhaps, they really didn't have a choice?
. . . are to blame originally, but we have all chosen to sin after that.
Since it appears that you are an expert on logic, could you grace us with a description of where the fallacy of the OP's argument lies?
I understand the premise of this thread and it is void of logic given the context of the situation.
It worked for Jesus because he was interrupted by the forces of evil while carrying out the will of the Father.
You are referring to baptism by blood.
I wouldn't bet my eternity on baptism by blood, although it might be true.
jmdewey60
I think that Jesus was against such a thing and was happy enough to have a meeting hall where believers could gather and praise god with prayer and song and readings from good books on the holy life that we should be following..