It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
littled16
reply to post by twsnhr013
Well, the Creator has never spoken to me personally demanding that I worship Him/Her, so maybe the whole idea of worshipping the Creator and assuming Him/Her to be omniscient/omnipotent is a construct of man. However you still have presented no reasonable proof of anything other than your personal opinion.
poloblack
The free will argument doesn't cut it. If the Creator knows ALL, even before you were born, the free will argument is moot.
beezzer
reply to post by AfterInfinity
I'm just glad it's all settled then.
Because as we all know, science has never been wrong. Ever!
littled16
reply to post by twsnhr013
Well, the Creator has never spoken to me personally demanding that I worship Him/Her, so maybe the whole idea of worshipping the Creator and assuming Him/Her to be omniscient/omnipotent is a construct of man. However you still have presented no reasonable proof of anything other than your personal opinion.
Religion makes one foolish.
The fool has said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is no one that does good.
poloblack
Not BS, that's your opinion, and I respectfully disagree. If the Creator has foreknowledge of all events that are going to transpire, your free will means nothing. It's already said and done. I believe there's a higher power, a ''Creator'', so to speak, but I'm not buying the original story.
AfterInfinity
Science has been wrong before. But the important thing is, we recognized it.edit on 22-1-2014 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)
twsnhr013
There is no omniscient omnipotent being.
beezzer
AfterInfinity
Science has been wrong before. But the important thing is, we recognized it.edit on 22-1-2014 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)
Doesn't this then, invalidate your entire argument?
I NEVER said anything implying that I pretend to know what you believe.I didn't know or care if you believed the original story or not. My response was to your calling my opinion about freewill bull$#!+. And I stand by what I said. If the ''Creator is ALL SEEING, and ALL KNOWING, your life was predestined, by the ''CREATOR''. Where is the ''freewill'' in that equation?
SLAYER69
poloblack
Not BS, that's your opinion, and I respectfully disagree. If the Creator has foreknowledge of all events that are going to transpire, your free will means nothing. It's already said and done. I believe there's a higher power, a ''Creator'', so to speak, but I'm not buying the original story.
Where and when did I state that I believe or follow the 'Original' story?
Projecting what you believe others believe onto them and then create an argument based on that belief of what you think they believe instead of actually finding out what those others actually think/believe?
I ask because you deny what you percieve I beleive then state something very similar to what I actually do.
AfterInfinity
beezzer
AfterInfinity
Science has been wrong before. But the important thing is, we recognized it.edit on 22-1-2014 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)
Doesn't this then, invalidate your entire argument?
Not really, given that you first have to recognize an error to correct it. You seem to think that being wrong is the end of it. No, you are wrong. Then you learn what the truth is. Then you are right because you know the truth.edit on 22-1-2014 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)
beezzer
AfterInfinity
beezzer
AfterInfinity
Science has been wrong before. But the important thing is, we recognized it.edit on 22-1-2014 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)
Doesn't this then, invalidate your entire argument?
Not really, given that you first have to recognize an error to correct it. You seem to think that being wrong is the end of it. No, you are wrong. Then you learn what the truth is. Then you are right because you know the truth.edit on 22-1-2014 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)
You stated that science shows that God does not exist.
Then you stated that science is often wrong.
So the vehicle that disproves the existence of God is wrong.
QED
(time for lunch now!)