It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ArcAngel
I have read this before, a long time ago. The guy is a nut and had severe psychological problems. These problems caused him to seek attention and caused his delusions.. eventually when someone tells so many lies, they begin to believe them. What dissapoints me the most though, is that there are people who want to believe so badly, that they throw off their ability to perceive things logically. For example, lasers that drill 7 miles a day? Come on folks, think about that for a second...the energy required to melt stone or other solid materials? Why do you think Lasers are mostly used for communications? It's the power restrictions.. and those of you who will say "but wait Arc, what about missile defence..?" Missile defence systems utilize pulsed lasers.. a continuous beam could not sustain the needed joules.. Any ways, you get my point I hope. There are a lot of smart people here that hopefully can see.
For example, lasers that drill 7 miles a day? Come on folks, think about that for a second...the energy required to melt stone or other solid materials? Why do you think Lasers are mostly used for communications? It's the power restrictions.. and those of you who will say "but wait Arc, what about missile defence..?" Missile defence systems utilize pulsed lasers.. a continuous beam could not sustain the needed joules.. Any ways, you get my point I hope. There are a lot of smart people here that hopefully can see.
In general CO2 lasers are more powerful than Nd/YAG lasers and are mainly used for cutting applications. The laser beam has a wavelength of 10.6�m and special lenses and mirrors are required for beam manipulation.
Inside the CO2 laser the beam is produced by the excitation of a laser gas inside a glass cavity. A typical lasing gas mixture comprises 80% helium 15% nitrogen and 5% carbon dioxide. High purity gases are required for the lasing gas as the laser is sensitive to gas borne impurities.
The laser gas mixture can be supplied either from a single cylinder of pre-mixed gas or from three cylinders which are mixed at the machine as required.
Cutting with CO2 lasers
During the cutting process the laser beam is focused on to the surface of the workpiece. Piercing of the material is assisted by a coaxial jet of assist gas which ejects the molten metal and vapour products. The assist gas also provides protection for the lens.
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
As far as I know according to current day science, there is no such thing as anti gravity. Schneider claimed the technology in the black world is much more advanced than the technology in the "white world" recently it was revealed that antigravity research has been going on for quite a long time.
Schneider explained this as a sophisticated device, beyond current technology. I think powerful rock cutting lasres is far less a jump to make than time travel
Well, apparantly you believe Lear had 10% truth in what he was saying.
Yet what if Schneider is telling more than 10% truth?
Originally posted by billybob
i saw the video. it's the single most convincing thing i've ever seen regarding the whole roswell/dulce myth(i use the word myth as in mythology, not as in 'fake'). phil was fanatically wide-eyed, he had a recent bullet wound to the shoulder, and his left hand was missing a cookie-cutter circle where he alleges an alien beam weapon melted it away in the dulce fire fight(which he was the first to happen upon. tall 'grays', he said).
i would like to qualify this by saying, the propoganda wing of the shadow government is powerful enough to fake the whole thing, and convince certain insiders that it is real, through fake leaks and outright brainwashing. this will pave the way for the unifying of earth through a faked alien invasion using genetically engineered 'hybrids' and the oil-blood-soaked monopoly media, which are actually made by humans.
Mining with lasers. How does that work then? I suppose the rock jsut vapourises and disappears does it? Ummmm no. Thought not. In fact if there were a laser powerful enough to accomplish this task (which you no doubt will say came from alien technology,) then all it would do is make solid rock into molten rock, it wouldn't bore a hole. and that's bearing in mind that we don't have the technology to even get to this stage yet.
The only thing he's ever presented as evidence is the list of U-boat commanders.
Originally posted by crijack
Just like Indigo had posted(see above) with the link. On a side note, you said if we had a laser powerful enough, it would just make molten rock. That is not necessarily true. Depending upon the power of the laser, you can induce multiple phase changes if you supply enough heat. Thus you would convert a solid to a liquid, and liquid to a vapor. Or if you added enough heat in the initial stages, you can go from solid to vapor as well(sublimation). RESEARCH!!!
[edit on 22-11-2004 by crijack]
Gazrok, I don't understand what you are saying. If Schneider was offering his opinion, we wouldn't even be having this discussion. Further, stop making comparisons to Lear and Cooper, as we've established there is no link between them, other than they make reference to a common incident.
You're still not following. They aren't just similar statements...they are almost literally VERBATIM as to what Cooper has said...i.e. as if he read Cooper's book, then did a lecture. His lecture covered the SAME EXACT TOPICS (i.e. Dulce, NWO trains, etc. etc.) and the SAME supposed details, with only the minor addition of being a survivor of the alien firefight (of which Cooper only stated he heard of) and that his father worked on the Philladelphia Experiment. Other than those two additions, his lecture came right out of Cooper's Pale Horse.
You asked me why I give (soul-sucking moon tower) Lear more credit.... I answered. It doesn't mean I believe his ideas (which I don't), but as a person, he at least is not attempting deception.
Again, ask anyone in intelligence, and they will tell you that secretive info is compartmentalized, for obvious reasons (to minimize security breaches). While it is possible that someone could come forward about KNOWING details of a specific project, etc., it is not very possible that someone could come forward KNOWING details of so many projects as Schneider claims (he claims this is what he knew, not what he believed). Therefore, we are left with two possibilities. Either Schneider was one of the top spymasters in the US shadow government...or he was lying his fool head off. Personally, my bet's on the latter...
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
Originally posted by crijack
Just like Indigo had posted(see above) with the link. On a side note, you said if we had a laser powerful enough, it would just make molten rock. That is not necessarily true. Depending upon the power of the laser, you can induce multiple phase changes if you supply enough heat. Thus you would convert a solid to a liquid, and liquid to a vapor. Or if you added enough heat in the initial stages, you can go from solid to vapor as well(sublimation). RESEARCH!!!
[edit on 22-11-2004 by crijack]
You can't really expect much from a troll like day dreamer. A troll is a troll is a troll. Thanks for your back-up hehe. I think we can return to more mature and intelligent discussion now.
Gazrok, I don't understand what you are saying. If Schneider was offering his opinion, we wouldn't even be having this discussion. Further, stop making comparisons to Lear and Cooper, as we've established there is no link between them, other than they make reference to a common incident. From the evidence for Schneider presented so far, his claims that is, the crux of them have been proven to be true or very possibly true: those include
Huge blackbudgets, very possibly 25% of the GNP
Laser tunneling devices, of which he displayed a good technical knowledge of(the movie "core" came afterwards)
The existence of black helicopters(later admitted)
The existence of Area 51(later admitted)
Government is enslaving the public
I've also found a possible photograph of his father:
Source: www.bielek.com...
I think there is a resemblance, and if you want it proven, I think it can be scientifically done, with the addition of his mothers photograph. I just don't think he would lie about his father. Really, there is no need too.
However, what remains the biggest evidence so far, is the fact that he has the bizarre wounds and injuries to prove it, which could account for a lot of his health problems. If it is indeed true he was shot by an alien weapon. Further, like he said, he was likely murdered and made to look like a "suicide"
You said, it would be "obvious" that killing him would give him more credence. That's a catch 22. If they let him live, because he's in plain sight, then it probably means he's hoaxing it. If they kill him, it would give him more credence, which must mean they did not, and he was hoaxing it.
However, just what is the limit of letting too much information flow? How long would they let anyone stay in plain sight? In the case of Schneider, it was beyond the limit. As he had lot of credible evidence and inside knowledge, he also claimed he had in his possession hundreds of thousands of documents and photographs, that he would upload if they pushed him too far. This guy was most definitely a threat.
You also find it highly implausible that this has elements of so many conspiracies. That does not make it implausible, for the common denominator of all, is a shadow government, that has it's own black world, in which alien technology is being reverse engineered and/or tested.
So far, all we know that alien technology is so far, is transistors, lasers, stealth and antigravity. We are at that level now. Does that mean we are technologically at par with an interstellar alien race? There is obviously a whole lot more technology that we do not know about. That could include star gates, wormholes, dimensional and time travel and whatnot.
We have to be open minded when we consider the concept of "advanced technology" and saying such and such is "implausible" or "unlikely" is fallacious, for we do not have any reference point.
So Schneider ties in a lot of conspiracies, many which have a good deal of evidence to support them. However, he does not claim to be doing this to reveal all this flashy gear the government has or to disclose the existence of aliens. He's doing this, because he believes that the government has gone insane that it is using all this advanced technology to enslave us, and he is obviously disenchanted with the whole thing, I know I would be. That is what the NWO conspiracies say, which are also supported by a lot of compelling evidence.
On the contrary my dear friend, this does not discredit Schneider's case, it gives him credit. For he is the only whistle blower so far, that has been able to present such a complete picture of what is happening in the world and what is going to happen in the world, and has had the evidence to do it............ and then he got murdered.
I think after so much disinformation, hoaxing, we have finaly got the genuine deal, and that is why I am emotionally supporting him. And all we are seem to be doing is doubting him. We will never be able to prove whether he was telling the truth or not, but if we let our instincts guide us, considering all the events and evidence we have, I think this is very good reason to fire on all cylinders and get this out to people, along with every other evidence.
What is very sad about the methods we are employing here. That even if someone from the inside came, and told us everything that is happening, down below, and above, we will ignore it, and call them a hoax, a charlatan or worse, a crackpot. We are actually helping the government in it's cover-up and it's agenda. That is sad, really it is.
[edit on 23-11-2004 by Indigo_Child]
My dear sir, I have met some ill-informed people in my time, but you certainly take the biscuit. You refer to "evidence" as if it is there in abundance. However it is not. Not at all. In fact there isn't any. Show me one piece of evidence, just one. Go on.