It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: funbox
that rock behind has a massive specular highlight, the trinkets is small and concentrated on the curve
not comparable as materials go unfortunately
they show different reactions to light
originally posted by: funbox
because the rock behind it has a soft specular highlight
the object underneath has a sharp specular highlight
shininess of the two are different as indicated by the specular highlights
if the rock behind was like the shiny thing in front then it would have many sharp points of specularity , not blended altogether as it looks now .
the curve of the trinket indicates a high reflective index ., like brushed metal
I don't see any specular highlights in any of those rocks
We can only see differences in colour, we don't have any way of knowing reflectivity just by looking at the photos, unless we could see Curiosity reflected in it somewhere.
Specularity is the visual appearance of specular reflections. In computer graphics, it means the quantity used in three-dimensional (3D) rendering which represents the amount of specular reflectivity a surface has. It is a key component in determining the brightness of specular highlights, along with shininess to determine the size of the highlights.
I think it's just white.
I think it's just a bright coloured rock.
originally posted by: funbox
ok , can you see highlight on the rocks all over the picture? can you see light gradiating to shadow on some of the surfaces?
ill stop using 3d modelling terminology
even with all that dust? .. how did it stay unaffected ? ..hmmm..!... maybe its surface is smooth and shiny , frictionless