It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Blue Shift
originally posted by: funbox
but then lots of pictures ive posted have been given the silence and contempt they deserve
On the other hand, mine are frequently ground-breaking, paradigm-shifting, earth (Mars) shattering in their obvious implications, so much so that the little rover thingy just puts the pedal to the metal and gets the hell out of the area before further, closer investigation blows everybody's mind. We're not ready. We have to work up to it slowly, find little bacteria first, let people get used to the idea. Then later we can spill the beans about the monsters.
mars.jpl.nasa.gov...
Spring water:
originally posted by: funbox
by thickness , do you mean flowrate of the water/dust as it gets ushered along by the wind?
why is there no spray pattern or gradient to the lighter sand , its a clearly defined edge all the way to its end ,
certainly have to give the Martian wind full credit for not colouring in over the lines .. but then that's only if you assume its sand moved by wind /airflow
originally posted by: funbox
well from some pictures it looks strong enough to create a wavy ocean of sand
but asides the wind , a slippage of material ? if this is the case then why is there not a greater amount of material build up at its end ? why has it shaped itself rounded and not rolled in little streaks as gravity pulls it down ... is there some kind of cohesive substance lurking within it composition ? or is it that the sand is darkened wet ? which may also cause slippage
To Arken: Good find, I wonder why the present thing is being called a dust flow (have you ever seen dust flow so neatly and for so long?) but the flows on the thread you posted are called water. Wouldn't the two look alike in some ways?