It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
beezzer
dlbott
reply to post by beezzer
I would like to know what are the positive things in your life. What do you see that is good in your country. Is there anything that you see is positive. Who are these heroes you speak of. Who is your positive influence.
With every negative there is a positive, the negative would like to not think so but it is fact. Your u simply cannot have one without the other.
It is kinda like someone denying there is a God but they can't deny there is evil. See what I mean.
So let's hear what you are thankful for and what you find good about your country. It was easy to rant, and I think that is OK and healthy, so I think it should be just as easy to tell us these things.
The Bot
Without getting too personal, positive things don't just happen or exist, if you want positive things in your life, then you have to create them.
Or else, you can wait passively for government or corporations to create something positive for you.
The choice is yours.
MystikMushroom
reply to post by beezzer
If I may respectfully point out, you sound like a victim yourself...a victim of a system turning into victims.
I hear and understand what you are saying, but isn't what you are saying only proving your point? Even those that see it happening are victims themselves.
I don't really know what the solution is, as I think the problem is so endemic and widespread. For any positive change away from this current trend to happen, it's going to need to be propagated from multiple angles.
I think a lot of it starts in the home, and is perpetuated by the MSM.
beezzer
jimmyx
why don't you just come out and say it, beezzer...anybody that doesn't have a good job, or is poor, is a loser, all due to their own laziness and apathy, so screw them. loud and clear, buddy...just like all the past revolutions, it was the poor and wretched that had nothing to lose, and had no hope of a future, that killed off the smug and arrogant people of privilege and wealth...so keep up the blame and shame on the underclass, and let history repeat itself, you can't help it if that's all you know.
A great example of social engineering.
I'm supposed to "care".
And by "caring", I'm supposed to cede my rights to self-determination for the good of the collective.
I should be ashamed of my success. Embarrassed by achieving my goals.
If people want to give up their independence to a central controlling authority, then they deserve the title that they have earned.
Bybyots
beezzer
reply to post by Bybyots
First let me apologise to many. I'm sorry. Not everyone can be brave. I wrongly assumed that people would naturally embrace noble efforts. I wrongly assumed that people would steer clear of cowardice. It takes guts to be responsible.
Did you mean for people to assume that what you mean is that if people do not align themselves with Klayman and his revolution that they are not brave? Are Klayman's the "noble efforts" that you are referring to?
edit on 19-11-2013 by Bybyots because: . : .
beezzer
corvuscorrax
beezzer
reply to post by JustMike
If someone is afraid to act, live, perform, function in a society outside of the perceived norm then I wouldn't call that brave, would you?
If you don't like cowardly, I would use the word "timid" if it sounds nicer. (See? Don't want to hurt feeling or anything!)
It is cowardly because we are afraid of societal repercussions brought about by a system that rewards the mediocre, rewards the timid, rewards the victim!
We can't have winners and losers anymore because that would upset the losers (see PC thread)
We can't be independent anymore because that would illustrate that people could function without government interference.
Government rewards cowardice.
Heh I'm what you would probably consider a 'loser' and I'm not upset about it and even if I were I'm pretty sure the 'winners' wouldn't even notice.
See? By our "new" societal standards, I'm supposed to care as to whether or not you're a loser.
But you should be free to make your life what you want of it.
It's not up to me.
corvuscorrax
beezzer
corvuscorrax
beezzer
reply to post by JustMike
If someone is afraid to act, live, perform, function in a society outside of the perceived norm then I wouldn't call that brave, would you?
If you don't like cowardly, I would use the word "timid" if it sounds nicer. (See? Don't want to hurt feeling or anything!)
It is cowardly because we are afraid of societal repercussions brought about by a system that rewards the mediocre, rewards the timid, rewards the victim!
We can't have winners and losers anymore because that would upset the losers (see PC thread)
We can't be independent anymore because that would illustrate that people could function without government interference.
Government rewards cowardice.
Heh I'm what you would probably consider a 'loser' and I'm not upset about it and even if I were I'm pretty sure the 'winners' wouldn't even notice.
See? By our "new" societal standards, I'm supposed to care as to whether or not you're a loser.
But you should be free to make your life what you want of it.
It's not up to me.
Don't know how you pulled that out of your ass. I didn't say anything about how you should care. I said pretty much the exact opposite.
Sheesh really a stretch there.
jimmyx
cut the crap, what rights have you ceded to self-determination for the good of the collective??..and who talks that way?...I've only heard that type of language on old star trek shows...the ACA does not take away your rights.
you still have to buy insurance from the same companies as before, it's now a more competitive free-market based choice.
corvuscorrax
reply to post by beezzer
I defined myself because it was relevant to the reply you posted.
Then you go on this I don't care BS. If you didn't care you wouldn't have made the thread genius.
I don't know enough about this Klayman to even comment.
Bybyots
reply to post by beezzer
I don't know enough about this Klayman to even comment.
Ah, so you must have been inspired by member olaru12's willingness to get out there and cover the event referenced in that member's thread.
Alright then
The GUT
Maybe I misread, but I DON'T think we are talking about those that are true victims here. Some are beat down to pitiful dust before they ever begin, and I'm GRATEFUL for me that these issues are in the realm of choice. It is for many of us. Don't mean it's easy, but many of us are fortunate that it hasn't been made virtually impossible. We should be filled with gratitude.
There are those, imo, that never had a chance and it's for them that we should put on the ball cup and engage the socio-engineering assholes. I can say assholes on ATS can't I?
If so: Eff you, you assholes!! There...I feel better now.
corvuscorrax
reply to post by beezzer
*sighs* Alright then I'll spell it out for you.
You said : We can't have winners and losers anymore because that would upset the losers
I said : I that someone like 'you' would likely define me as a loser and I wouldn't care. Directly contradicting what you said.
You then proceeded to arrive at a conclusion that was nowhere near what I stated and then said I was making it about myself when it was just a convenient way to prove what you said was stupid.
There you go champ!
Keep working on your reading comprehension.
rangerdanger
Just to add,
I usually agree with the OP, as he's usually pretty on point.
I just don't agree with calling other people cowards on the internet. It doesn't take a big man to post something anonymously like that, and it just sounds like trolling.