It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Qspeedyrock
reply to post by beezzerIt depends on what you mean by being cowardly. Some times being cowardly in some peoples terms means being submissive but in some situations it will keep people alive. You must remember that if being brave means taking actions that lead to violence and i dont neccessarly mean incited by the persons being brave (Eg Being shot simply for protesting) then sometimes it is better for being cowardly at that particular time to stay alive. Dead people can no longer be brave. Sometimes more supple methods that seem cowardly to some are actually more effective at getting change.
beezzer
So you would rather want government determining social behavior rather than having the individual be responsible for their own behavior?
beezzer
reply to post by JustMike
If someone is afraid to act, live, perform, function in a society outside of the perceived norm then I wouldn't call that brave, would you?
beezzer
How about, be free to determine your own life.
Stop hiding behind the apron strings of mama-government?
BubbaJoe
beezzer
reply to post by BubbaJoe
So you don't think that people who want Obamacrae, want entitlements, want a larger government, are cowards?
Obamacare will save me about $400 bucks a month and possibly take me off of the VA rolls. Entitlements need to be looked at, and fraud needs to be eliminated, fraud needs to be eliminated everywhere. I don't think we need larger government, what we have needs to work more efficiently, and needs to be reformed, at every level. But, hey, I am a centerist, and no one wants to listen to me, I don't scream loud enough, and I can't attract any nut jobs.
Pejeu
beezzer
How about, be free to determine your own life.
Stop hiding behind the apron strings of mama-government?
I'd rather join/work for government to keep you 'brave' restless natives down.
Cancerwarrior
Why do I get the feeling that this is ultimately another one of the many many "poor people are ruining Murica" threads that are so prevalent on ATS these days?
Of course they want a nation of cowards and scared people. Much easier to control things that way. I thought this was common knowledge to anyone on this site.
And I'm not so sure if cowardice is the problem rather than complacence.
Alot of people I know realize that the system is totally insane and corrupt, but what can be done about it? Nothing ultimately. So might as well just look out for myself and those I care about.
Sadly this is the attitude of most nowadays. is it right? or wrong?
Does it really matter in the end?edit on 20-11-2013 by Cancerwarrior because: (no reason given)
8675309jenny
And so Atlas eventually shrugged....
Sublimecraft
reply to post by beezzer
I think I know what you are getting at.........
beezzer
That answer is probably (and sadly) more accurate than you'd ever care to admit.
beezzer
luciddream
OMG how can anyone bash the independent groups like the Tea Party... sooo innocent!!!
PC is annoying but there are people who want to go the other way, aka, want to discriminate, accuse, and w/e and not get penalized or criticized for it.
Too much PC is bad but i think some people want it completely gone....sorry it keeps racist and bigots in check or makes them stand out.
"i wanna be bad to this person but damn PC is in its way!"
i think this hate on PC is actually an underlying agenda to destabilize or cripple whatever is opposed to tea party/republican goals.
So you would rather want government determining social behavior rather than having the individual be responsible for their own behavior?