It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
OpenMindedRealist
reply to post by gariac
Refusal, or inability, to comprehend something does not make it any less true. Nor will confidence make an ignorant delusion any more real.
At this point, I have to dismiss you as a either unreachable or a paid defender of Obamacare.
I urge others in this thread to resist wasting any more words on gariac. The information has been provided, and the resources are out there for confirmation.
notquitesure
JayinAR
reply to post by FlyingFox
I am a libertarian and have zero problems with the idea of socialized medicine.
I think health care should fall under one of Gov's very, very limited responsibilities in that we employ them to protect us. Protection should include basic medical service, free of charge.
Its one of a few things our NUMEROUS nonsensical taxes should go to.
All you should have to do is show freakin' proof of citizenship to get all the care you need.
Unfortunately our taxes go to pie in the sky defense military projects that you and I will never see because the idiots at the DOD are a bunch of paranoid weirdos, among many other useless appropriations.
It is beyond time people put their collective foot down.
I sort of agree with this.
I think we should all have a catastrophic level of coverage, as well as annual or twice annual screenings covered.
Where that gets a little sticky is that there should be no mandatory required treatments. For instance, if your screening says you're at risk for high blood pressure, you shouldn't be forced onto meds. As a free American, you should have the right to take that information and decide on your best course of action (diet, exercise, etc.) if you so choose.
Make all minor medical examinations and procedures out of pocket. Doing this would suck a ton of cash out of the system and lower prices across the board.
The real problem is that the lobbyists that write the laws rather like the idea of MORE money being spent on insurance, medicine, and so forth. Throw in a passel of politicians bent on creating a majority dependent class and you have a recipe for disaster...which we are facing.edit on 19-11-2013 by notquitesure because: typo
bigfootgurl
Obama could have just cut to the chase and issued an executive order making healthcare illegal for anyone but himself, his family and his buddies. Why beat around the bush like this?
gariac
Hint. Ah screw it, let me just this out loud.
YOU WOULD NEED TO BE SICK TO USE HEALTH INSURANCE. Who has the time to waste going to the doctor for no good reason.
Worse yet, you can get a finger where it doesn't belong or other less desirable treatment.
Well thanks for a good laugh.
tallcool1
You are right, my friend. More and more people - even Obama supporters - can see that this is a horribly written law designed to fill up the ol' coffers. Nothing at all to do with providing affordable health care to the masses.
In addition, ODI confirmed previously released preliminary calculations that insurance companies' costs to provide individual health coverage will increase by 83%
President Obama repeatedly promised that his signature health law, the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. Obamacare, would reduce insurance premiums by $2,500 for the typical family. Instead, premiums have increased by a comparable amount. Video compilation by Naked Emperor News of TheBlaze.com. For more on how Obama came up with this faulty projection, read this account in the New York Times
gariac
reply to post by marg6043
Here is a tough question. What direction did insurance rate go before the ACA?
It is not likely that the ACA will have a positive effect on health care spending, by which I mean making health care more affordable. As economist Dean Baker writes, we will continue to pay high prices for medications, medical devices and physicians. Although there are proven methods to control health care costs such as simplified administration, global budgets and negotiating bulk prices, none of them were included in the ACA. In fact, the ACA increases our already enormous administrative costs by adding new levels of administration to our health system.
guohua
gariac
reply to post by marg6043
Here is a tough question. What direction did insurance rate go before the ACA?
Excuse Me
You are at this Again, you have no Idea what you're talking about.
It is already a proven fact that Healthcare rates have increased, some as much as 17% to 41 %.
Prior to ACA:
www.forbes.com... ow-to-elderly/
What they discovered so far is that Obamacare has increased premiums by 41% in some states.
It is the Young and Healthy that are taking the Big Hit, they are the ones paying for Obamacares Tax Payers Funded Subsidies.
So,,, so me your Proof that Health Care Premiums have Not Increased Mr. or Mrs. gariac.
You may need to Expand your choose of News Outlets other than the Huff and NPR.
You may read up on your misconceptions of How Great and How People Love Obamacare, Here:
www.forbes.com... ow-to-elderly/
www.forbes.com...
www.aljazeera.com...
edit on 20-11-2013 by guohua because: (no reason given)
White House spokesperson Jay Carney stated numerous times recently that the slowing of the rise of health care spending in the United States is a result of the Affordable Care Act. In fact, the slowing of total health care spending actually began after the economic crisis of 2008, which was prior to the ACA being signed into law in 2010. As I wrote earlier this year, the slowing of health care spending was due to self-rationing. As more of the cost of health care is shifted onto the individual, we see less utilisation of health services.
They point out that the 3 percent growth from 2009 to 2010 was unusually low. While it’s tough to discern a clear, long-term trend in the growth rates, the annual increase was holding steady at around 5 percent or 5.5 percent from 2007 to 2009.
New research from the Manhattan Institute estimates that insurance rates for young men will rise by 99 percent. Rates for younger women will rise between 55 percent to 62 percent, according to the right-leaning New York think tank.
gariac
reply to post by guohua
Hint: the past is the past. It is different from the future or the present. We will try this again.
In the PAST, were insurance rates rising or falling.?
Hint: the answer is one of the two words: [rising, falling]