Why does the paranormal "elite" ignore Bashar? A good article!

This interview

reply to post by FlySolo



no he was not taught by Jane Roberts.whats your source for that false information.

reply to post by kauskau


I already linked the source. The person who owns apocalypse-how.com... The site is all about Bashar.
Didn't you bother to check? And the video above, he talks about it but just doesn't mention her name. It's quite obvious who he's talking about.

You also didn't bother to acknowledge why his speech is so much different in his early video compared to today's? Why does he not have the the same 'flow' and 'woosh'? Try and explain away that my dim witted friend. Clearly, it's not the same AT ALL.

Checkmate.

"You also didn't bother to acknowledge why his speech is so much different in his early video compared to today's? Why does he not have the the same 'flow' and 'woosh'? Try and explain away that my dim witted friend. Clearly, it's not the same AT ALL. "


First: our frequency raised significantly in the last 30 years. So we are "much nearer" to them now than we were back than. Thats why the channeling is more effortless. "The accent" you hear is an interpretation of energy. THey are not "really speaking" . They send thought patterns and images.

Second: Channeling is not easy. Its really a techique of letting go. WHen you are not fully in the trance state, the "energy" tries to push through and thats what you are seeing in the old videos. He is not really "in a clean state". And it takes some time to get used to it.
(but of course you will not believe that because the universe fully supports you in the belief that he was just "starting his hoax"..and i see the other version of reality. The universe fully supports us both! Great isn´t it ? But of course you still believe that there is only ONE Objective reality..But thats not true. Thats why i say: we will not agree. You chose to not believe in its authenticity so you will not see anything that speaks for the validity of the claim that darryl is really channeling ET..

So...checkmate my ass..
This AND That..not THis or THat.

But stone-age is stone-age

reply to post by kauskau

First: our frequency raised significantly in the last 30 years. So we are "much nearer" to them now than we were back than. Thats why the channeling is more effortless. "The accent" you hear is an interpretation of energy. THey are not "really speaking" . They send thought patterns and images.

What?? Your answer for his speech difference is because we're closer to "them" Where's your source for this? You're making this up as you go along because you don't have an answer. So yes, checkmate!

Again, where's your answer to the evidence I just showed he went to Jane Roberts sessions? It came directly from a Bashar site.
The writing is on the wall and there is no backing out of it. He freely admits going to her sessions.

You see, I have actually been watching his videos and have been doing my due diligence. I have probably learned more about this guy than you have while refuting your nonsense. Something most members here couldn't give a crap about.

You know what really is a shame? Your fragile world would crumble around you if you discovered Anka was a fraud. That's sad man. Get a grip.

reply to post by FlySolo


i still dont understand your point. I did not know that he was taught by Jane Roberts ( an excellent medium herself. You also believe she is a fraud too?)
So what point do you have : that he did not naming the person where he learned channeling in an interview?

And????

Its even a much greater "advertisement" to say it loudly that Jane Roberts was his teacher (i never head darryl say that). Because she is one of the few "Quality" channels...

The Seth Material is great: its bashar in a little bit more complicated..

but you have an interesting tactic of ridiculing others and only pointing out things that "serve you"...

you remind me of fox and this conservative idiot..how is his name again..
The one John Steward sometimes battles.
You have a similar vibe

kauskau
reply to post by FlySolo

 

i still dont understand your point. I did not know that he was taught by Jane Roberts ( an excellent medium herself. You also believe she is a fraud too?)
So what point do you have : that he did not naming the person where he learned channeling in an interview?

And????

Its even a much greater "advertisement" to say it loudly that Jane Roberts was his teacher (i never head darryl say that). Because she is one of the few "Quality" channels...

The Seth Material is great: its bashar in a little bit more complicated..

Did you watch the interview? Why does he neglect to mention he went to see Jane Roberts? He explains everything as to how he got started but doesn't breathe one word of their name. Yet, a bashar fan from that website discovered that he had indeed met with her. This is called "lying by omission" He doesn't want to draw attention that his shtick is a direct ripoff of Jane Roberts. This is my point.

kauskau
but you have an interesting tactic of ridiculing others and only pointing out things that "serve you"...

For example?

you remind me of fox and this conservative idiot..how is his name again..
The one John Steward sometimes battles.
You have a similar vibe

You mean Jon Stewart? Or Bill 'Oreilly?

reply to post by FlySolo


Bill o´Reilly ...yes!


No Darryl never said he learned from Jane Roberts and the guy you quoted also did not say it. He visited some of her channelings. So?? What should he say?
Like :I was at "freakin " jane roberts sessions. Yes THE Jane Roberts..."??

I
But why should the name be important. Back than there were much less channeling than today and today not many people know Seth...

So ....whatever .
You want to distrust this guy do it..

Your choice. Its interesting that you really do not find much to "debunk" him. OOOHH he did not tell everyone that he was at Jane Roberts sessions..oh my god..WHat a liar.

ts ts

here for example is a guy who got proof that there is more to Life than the majority knows..

But of course for sceptics there are just 2 fakers meeting.
Its really paranoid how you are thinking.

reply to post by kauskau

Bill o´Reilly ...yes!

I can't stand O' reilly and I'm nothing like him

No Darryl never said he learned from Jane Roberts and the guy you quoted also did not say it. He visited some of her channelings. So?? What should he say?
Like :I was at "freakin " jane roberts sessions. Yes THE Jane Roberts..."??

Yes, he should have mentioned it. It's a very large part of the equation don't you think? Like you said, there weren't many channelers then and it fits perfectly into the time frame of when he began channeling. She would have been a large inspiration in his life and I find it very telling he doesn't say where he learned to do it. It's deceptive. Period.

Its interesting that you really do not find much to "debunk" him

I have, but you're to ignorant to consider everything I have brought to the table. Especially my telepathy debunked thread. I nailed it.

reply to post by FlySolo


you nailed it? NAILED IT?

HOW IGNORANT must you be to say that evey living medium EXPLAINING IN DEPTH the mechanism of channeling is a liar?
It is KNOWN that channeling does not work as you think it does. Bashar can not speak "english at all". He can only use the language of the person channeling AND can use the "phonetics" to form words from his own history...(like counting in sessani)


Ever person on this planet channeling KNOWS that the energy one channels CAN ONLY USE THE WORDS AND PATTERNS THAT THE MEDIUM KNOWS.

You nailed it...pfff

my god.
How old are you?

for the not so ignorant people. here darryl himself explains how it works!!

reply to post by kauskau


Do you understand the English meaning of the word "proof" -Beweis in German. Not Story time. Erzyhlung, Geschichte, Schwank
There is no proof in your video. Just some guy talking about his experience in a float chamber. Big deal, proves nothing

I did some research on his bio


He worked for many, MANY sci-fi movies for holywood


The guy has a rich imagination and can manipulate people easily, AND make money


So yeah, thats why people ignore him

reply to post by FlySolo


its like speaking with a stone...

AS I SAID: NO PROOF WILL BE GIVEN TO YOU. FOr many reasons. You don´t have to believe it. You will be supported in whatever you want to believe right now in terms of that contact.
I will not convince you. But one day you will know that it was real all along.
And now : do the things you believe to be real.

kauskau
reply to post by FlySolo

 

you nailed it? NAILED IT?

HOW IGNORANT must you be to say that evey living medium EXPLAINING IN DEPTH the mechanism of channeling is a liar?
It is KNOWN that channeling does not work as you think it does. Bashar can not speak "english at all". He can only use the language of the person channeling AND can use the "phonetics" to form words from his own history...(like counting in sessani)


Ever person on this planet channeling KNOWS that the energy one channels CAN ONLY USE THE WORDS AND PATTERNS THAT THE MEDIUM KNOWS.

You nailed it...pfff

my god.
How old are you?

edit on 18-1-2014 by kauskau because: (no reason given)

I'm much wiser than you are little bird.

Bashar can not speak "english at all". He can only use the language of the person channeling

If he can't speak English, then how the bloody hell can he understand the questions??????????????
My god are you dense. Wait, before you answer, I'll answer for you.

Because Darryl understands the question and translates it in pure thought back to Bashar. Right? So where's the conversion from English > to Essanssi language?

reply to post by kauskau

But one day you will know that it was real all along.

What's that supposed to mean? Do you have some special Essanssi powers of knowledge or something?

reply to post by FlySolo


Expansion is in your nature.

You just limit yourself for fun.

SO have fun.