It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Zaphod58
reply to post by smurfy
That's why they got a patent for it. I'm not saying it won't EVENTUALLY be used, but right now, it's just not feasible. An aircraft just can't carry enough material to leave a huge trail that goes from horizon to horizon.
Not to mention, why would it even be visible?
tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Mikeultra
You are persistent! I've shown you the U.S. Patent showing what the claim of the invention is (to control global warming),
Wrong, it is for a method and no device is even mentioned.
NONPOINT21
s.
I asked if you have chemtrails over your cities. There are none over Cincinnati. To this guy I know what contrails are and there are plenty over Cincy because of the airport.
Contrails (/ˈkɒntreɪlz/; short for "condensation trails") or vapor trails are long thin artificial (man-made) clouds that sometimes form behind aircraft. Their formation is most often triggered by the water vapor in the exhaust of aircraft engines, but can also be triggered by the changes in air pressure in wingtip vortices or in the air over the entire wing surface.[1] Like all clouds, contrails are made of water, in the form of a suspension of billions of liquid droplets or ice crystals.
Clouds are made of tiny drops of water or ice crystals that settle on dust particles in the atmosphere. The droplets are so small - a diameter of about a hundredth of a millimetre - that each cubic metre of air will contain 100 million droplets.
Zaphod58
reply to post by Mikeultra
You have a process, you have the Agenda 21, but you have yet to prove that the means of delivery is real. You have to prove that before you can prove what they're used for.
Why are you so determined to deny chem-trails?
Zaphod58
reply to post by Mikeultra
And if it was in use, you would see a MASSIVE increase in engine problems, and engine changes, and the airlines would be screaming about it. It can run millions to overhaul and engine, and the average cost of a new engine is around $20M.
Aluminum going through the engine causes damage. In fact it's one of the things we had to test for when we did oil samples from the engine, because it's a sign of damage to the engine. You really think that the airlines, who usually lose money every quarter, would be ok with having to replace the engine every few months, instead of every few years?
This didn't appear to be planes taking off and coming into the airport. This is different. They were literally painting the sky and so close together going in opposite directions. Like I said, I don't claim to know wth they are doing. I just know what I see. I see them doing this all the time but yesterday was outrageous as there were sooo many. I counted ten close together and then I had to watch the road.
tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Mikeultra
People have eyes in their head!
They also have mouths what's your point?
Maybe they were designed to burn this metal-ridden fuel.
Mikeultra
tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Mikeultra
You are persistent! I've shown you the U.S. Patent showing what the claim of the invention is (to control global warming),
Wrong, it is for a method and no device is even mentioned.
No I'm right, I said the invention when I should have actually said the idea. U.S. Patent 5003186 idea is to add aluminum oxide micron sized particles to jet fuel which will then be blown out the engine exhausts to form reflective chem-trails which spread out forming an ugly grey overcast sky, hopefully to stop global warming. That's how the 2 sick scientist should have written up their patent claim.
I'm not blind, I can see.
Zaphod58
reply to post by totallackey
They're over Nashville. I'm about an hour from there and we've been watching them.