[HOAX]UFOs sightings to come in october 2013 over LONDON.[HOAX]

reply to post by AthlonSavage


Are you boring where you are? You saw some light here and you came?

reply to post by Olivet


yes and you will be the slave race you were born to be.

And the days just keep rolling by full of more FAIL.

Olivet

AthlonSavage
reply to post by Olivet

 

That the Ufos will not deliver themselves as per your prediction.

Disappointing prediction. I tought you were more original. I have seen this kind of prediction a zillion times in this thread.

And so far EVERY SINGLE ONE of those predictions has come true. In fact, all those people predicting rock all will happen are a million miles in front of you on accuracy so far

Everyone else - correct so far
Olivet - totally wrong so far

it's now 22nd - christening is tomorrow, 23rd.
is it worth me getting my sleeping bag, and camera and going to camp out near Kensington Palace?

and I've looked over the first few pages and you don't say that they'll return in a fortnight, but you say something like 'within a few days', and you also say 'on or shortly after' the christening.

so I guess we just wait and see - it'll be filmed by loads of different broadcasters, and probably streamed live somewhere, maybe shown live on British TV? I suggest people keep an eye on the footage, even if it's only so you can come on here afterwards to say that he hasn't been abducted yet.

reply to post by Olivet

THAT IS WHY I CAN NOT EXPLAIN IT TO YOU TOO CLEARLY FOR THE FUTURE IS DEPENDING ON THE FACT THAT THE CONNECTION IS NOT CLEARLY CLAIMED.

So...a simple proper explanation will endanger the future??

Wow. What a powerful race those ET's must be and this whole centuries long progression to lead to baby George-Jesus for it all to crumble down with a simple explanation.

And the return of King Arthur and you becoming a major world player transferred into a different body will all be in shambles if you so much as explain things?

reply to post by exiteternity

Short term memory loss?

Do you really want ask that?

This assumes A. It didnt already "came to me" a.k.a I didnt already understood it. Perhaps I was just being funny towards him.. Humouring him.. in fact I did know perfectly well what he was talking about.

And that is you assuming such when Taoist posted what he meant by that,

In fact you didn't know perfectly well what I was talking about (assuming this is about our interaction earlier in the thread) when you replied to me with this

oh ok i see now finally what you mean. you mean nothing can be a fact. sorry for misunderstand but i dont think mathematicians agree with you on that point! neither scientests or physicians agree nothing can be a fact. for example that 1+1=2 is considered by many a fact. but i see now what u mean

In reply to this by myself

This the point of facts and how semantics and new understandings can be added to the facts to create new facts from the old ones. We don't know everything so facts are only facts because know them to be until we know more.

I never stated there are no facts, in the next post in reply to yours of this quoted above I stated there are facts.

1+1=2 is a fact in a mathematical equation, so I agree with mathematicians. I mean everything is belief not that nothing can be fact. Its an extremely hard concept for me to explain in terms so other might understand as I do, We have facts and they are so because they are rock solid, they are not suppose to change. I believe we will gain new knowledge of concepts that we simply cannot comprehend or even begin to think or imagine comprehension of because its a concept thats eluded life from the time we think the universe began. With new concepts that are as of now unknown to us new facts will emerge which in turn could possibly refute the facts we know today. There is no wrong or right until we get to the end and really see the big picture.

with your reply to this being....

so there will never be facts? or rights or wrongs? nothing is proven nor ever will, because "sometimes in the future new facts can arise to kill the current facts" ?

Many questions being asked for someone who says they understand what i am saying and followed by....

but i know what you mean, i just dont think its very logical by your logic i am a space unicorn already, but noone knows YET, im wearing human skin only! its ok buddy you are welcome to think that way too its seems like a very ambigous life to lead where nothing is real cus nothing can ever be proven, since nothing are facts. that must be a pain in the arse to live such way

No,

It really seems you don't.

its not an insult towards you, you can take it that way,

it could be an insult towards myself for not being able to express myself so readers can understand what I am trying to get across.

My reply to that post is on pg 27, no need to keep repeating.

And to end the interaction before you took what Taoist posted as an insult, you posted

ok buddy i think you went over my head i believe what can be proven facts, the rest is just imagination. you believe anything and everything lets end it at that understanding

I stared this post of yours because of agreement to end it at the understanding that you didn't understand what i was saying,

that may be my fault because of my wording and expression.

But you persisted with whats quoted at the top of this post and this, so I thought I would chime in again

B. That it "maybe" will come to me. Enferring that my intelligence MIGHT just be great enough to comprehend what he is saying. How is this not insulting, sir

Taoist explained with this

Maybe you do, but it seems like you are having problems with it. It imples I understand inhaleexhale. And you may too some time. Doesn't assume I know more than you.It's all relative. (THough sometimes it's all subjective!) :0

It implied his understanding of what I was saying and pointed out (from reading your replies to me) seemed to show you didn't understand.


You did say it all went over your head and assumed to understand what i believed and ended it there.

no. we were disussing "what is fact?" on a humoristic non-serious way. Then you come in from left-field into our discussion saying "it might come to you".

Well you did say it went over your head,

i claimed i didnt "get it" for sake of argument, that is very common. Just cause i wanna hear more from the "other side" in that case InhaleExhale..

What you posted before you claimed that showed you didn't get it,

Whats common is the inability to be truthful at all times and the use of deception as a way of interacting with one another to gain our knowledge.

If you wanted to hear more of my mad ramblings about my own personal beliefs why do so in a deceptive way claiming you didn't get it when in fact you say you did?

and i find it silly that your trying to excuse yourself.. just admit it.. what you said was extremely arrogant and that of a perspective from "high horse" or "pedistal".

Extremely arrogant from your perspective and now that you show us where your perspective can be seen from one could conclude that, that would be your intention if you were to ever tell another that maybe one day it will come to them.

Taoist explained where his perspective is coming from and that it was not from a high horse position yet you still want to argue what his perspective was for the words he posted to you.


Why does any of this really matter, lets just let it go,

Cmon October is almost over,

let wait for it to end and try keeping things on topic, instead of our misunderstanding derailing.

reply to post by Menedes567

while we awakened ones(less than 1% of Earth population) will be hardly fazed when the ETs show up....

You do realize you are sort of claiming to be Illuminati by saying this, or part of some banking secret society elite

Are you one of the illuminated ones Menedes?

reply to post by Olivet

When I see someone insulting me, ridiculing me or name calling me, I just send back a tough message. That's all.

What you see is your perspective and might not be the real intention of whats asked or said of you.

So your assumptions have lead you to send these tough messages when your assumption were incorrect.

Some questions were asked early on this thread and you assumed it was ridicule and went on from that assumption which has lead you to here,

admitting to childish games of name calling because you thought it was what was being directed at you.

Did you once ask in this thread of anyone you believed was ridiculing you what they meant and if they were ridiculing you and if there is some misunderstanding?

reply to post by Vasa Croe


You shout victory before the finish line? Absolutely reckless.

expatwhite

Olivet

AthlonSavage
reply to post by Olivet

 

That the Ufos will not deliver themselves as per your prediction.

Disappointing prediction. I tought you were more original. I have seen this kind of prediction a zillion times in this thread.

And so far EVERY SINGLE ONE of those predictions has come true. In fact, all those people predicting rock all will happen are a million miles in front of you on accuracy so far

Everyone else - correct so far
Olivet - totally wrong so far

Before the right date it's too early. After it's too late.

So far, every single one of those predictions was before the date. TOTALLY WRONG.

So far, my prediction is still to come until the right date. TOTALLY RIGHT.

The difference between the two predictions is...who knows the date? The one who hides it or the others.

CrastneyJPR
it's now 22nd - christening is tomorrow, 23rd.
is it worth me getting my sleeping bag, and camera and going to camp out near Kensington Palace?

and I've looked over the first few pages and you don't say that they'll return in a fortnight, but you say something like 'within a few days', and you also say 'on or shortly after' the christening.

so I guess we just wait and see - it'll be filmed by loads of different broadcasters, and probably streamed live somewhere, maybe shown live on British TV? I suggest people keep an eye on the footage, even if it's only so you can come on here afterwards to say that he hasn't been abducted yet.

You are absolutely right. I said 'few days' and 'before or shorthy after the christening'. It's in the OP and in other posts of mine.

Not a bad idea to be equiped and prepared this week!

Olivet

AthlonSavage
reply to post by Olivet

 

More original? why would you of made that assumption about me. Im more factual than original!

Because the newbees coming here often feel that they have something new to add, thinking they don't need to read all what was already written.

another wild assumption that you're running with,


Are you GOD?

how is you you know all these things about what newbies do when coming into threads, about what Biblical scholars believe?

Do you get this info from your secret intel that cannot be spoken of because of security reasons?

Chamberf=6
reply to post by Olivet

 

THAT IS WHY I CAN NOT EXPLAIN IT TO YOU TOO CLEARLY FOR THE FUTURE IS DEPENDING ON THE FACT THAT THE CONNECTION IS NOT CLEARLY CLAIMED.

So...a simple proper explanation will endanger the future??

Will kinda endanger the mission of the Two Witnesses and Christ Returned.

reply to post by Olivet

You are absolutely right. I said 'few days' and 'before or shorthy after the christening'. It's in the OP and in other posts of mine.

the OP being posted on the 7th, you did say a few days.

Look up what the word few means.

7 days = 1 week

If the Christening is on the 23rd, that is at least a couple of weeks not a few days,

Its a couple of weeks and few days before or after, but how can cling to a few weeks being the same a few days.

A few days have past, but you also said before the end of October which would more than a few days from when the OP was posted.
You also mentioned that you wouldn't be surprised if they showed up early November.

Sorry but why cant you see how much you mix things up that make it almost impossible for readers to get your point of view, when asked, you reply that you are misunderstood or that posters cant read or their comprehension is lacking or the best one its secret intel that you cant give out due to security reasons.

Its the 23rd now,


That is 16 days since the OP.

Is 16 days, which is more than 2 weeks, more than half a month and just over 1/24 of a year a few days.

Prophecy is all about deciphering the message,

Here are a few links to the meaning of the word "few"

www.thefreedictionary.com...



answers.yahoo.com...


Does few mean more than these whats described in the links, especially the Yahoo answers,

The answer given in the Yahoo link is what I assume to be the most widely understood meaning of the word,

please correct me if it means more than 5 and also state in your view what the maximum number can be for there to be a few of anything be it days or apples, so as to have some understanding of what your saying.

the 'few days' comment (in the original post - so not hard to find and look at) is about there being 'a few days' between the abduction (on or shortly after the christening) and their return back again.

it's not 'in a few days time' or 'a few days from now', or anything else to do with the time the OP was posted.

as I say, the OP is easy to go find and look at to clarify this misunderstanding of what he's written.
I know he's French and his English isn't perfect but this in not misunderstandable.

reply to post by Olivet

Olivet

Chamberf=6
reply to post by Olivet

 

THAT IS WHY I CAN NOT EXPLAIN IT TO YOU TOO CLEARLY FOR THE FUTURE IS DEPENDING ON THE FACT THAT THE CONNECTION IS NOT CLEARLY CLAIMED.

So...a simple proper explanation will endanger the future??

Will kinda endanger the mission of the Two Witnesses and Christ Returned.

So the Witnesses and the Christ Returned (baby George) --surely quite powerful figures--would be "endangered" by a simple explanation???

CrastneyJPR
the 'few days' comment (in the original post - so not hard to find and look at) is about there being 'a few days' between the abduction (on or shortly after the christening) and their return back again.

it's not 'in a few days time' or 'a few days from now', or anything else to do with the time the OP was posted.

as I say, the OP is easy to go find and look at to clarify this misunderstanding of what he's written.
I know he's French and his English isn't perfect but this in not misunderstandable.

Thank you to correct things about the 'few days' thing! The poster you are answering to mixed 'in the coming days' and 'few days'. These two expressions don't address the same periods.

You understood it all! Bravo.

Chamberf=6
reply to post by Olivet

 

Olivet

Chamberf=6
reply to post by Olivet

 

THAT IS WHY I CAN NOT EXPLAIN IT TO YOU TOO CLEARLY FOR THE FUTURE IS DEPENDING ON THE FACT THAT THE CONNECTION IS NOT CLEARLY CLAIMED.

So...a simple proper explanation will endanger the future??

Will kinda endanger the mission of the Two Witnesses and Christ Returned.

So the Witnesses and the Christ Returned (baby George) --surely quite powerful figures--would be "endangered" by a simple explanation???

edit on 10/22/2013 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)

Think about what LEGITIMACY MATTERS means.

reply to post by InhaleExhale


I see the way some people are expressing their remarks. When there are honest questions, I see them too.